Description of how 2 people interact. Mutual in that both caregiver and baby respond to each other's signals (turn-taking) and each elicits a response from the other
Alert phases
Babies have certain 'alert phases' in which they signal that they are ready for some interaction
Mothers pick up on babies actions around 2/3 of the time
From 3 months interaction becomes more frequent
Active involvement
Both adults AND babies play active role interacting
Both caregiver and baby can initiate interactions – and they take turns in doing so
Interactional synchrony
Caregiver and baby reflect actions + emotions of the other in a coordinated way. Mutual behaviour – adults and babies respond in time to sustain communication. Communication of adult/infant mirror each other
Interactional synchrony begins at 2 weeks old
High levels of interactional synchrony
Associated with better quality mother-baby attachment
Observations into caregiver-infant interactions
Use well-controlled procedures with both mother and infant being filmed
Ensuring fine details of behaviour can be recorded and later analysed
Babies aren't aware they're behaviour is being observed – so their behaviour doesn't change in response to controlled observations
Schaffer's stages of attachment
Common pattern in the development of infants' attachments, can be divided into 4 distinct stages
Schaffer's stages of attachment
Asocial stage
Indiscriminate attachment
Specific attachment
Multiple attachments
Schaffer and Emerson identified 4 distinct stages in the development of infant attachment behaviour
Schaffer and Emerson research
High external validity as most observations were made by parents during ordinary activities and reported to the researchers
Issues studying asocial stage as babies have poor co-ordination skills/are immobile, making it difficult to observe subtle signs of anxiety and attachment
Schaffer and Emerson's stages of attachment
Can be used to plan parents' use of daycare, as different stages require different approaches
Fathers are much less likely to become babies' first attachment figure
Only 3% of cases was the father the first object of attachment, 27% case father was joint first object of attachment with mother
75% of babies formed attachment with father by 18 months
Quality of baby's attachment with mothers
Relayed to attachments in adolescence, suggesting attachment to fathers less important than attachment to mothers
Quality of fathers' play with babies
Related to the quality of adolescent attachments, suggesting fathers have a different role from mothers (more to do with play/stimulation that emotional development)
Primary caregiver fathers spent more time smiling, imitating, holding infants compare to secondary caregiver fathers
Key to attachment
Level of responsiveness, NOT the gender
Imprinting
Attachment is formed to the first moving object an animal sees
Lorenz's study on imprinting
Randomly split a large clutch of goose eggs into 2 conditions: one half hatched naturally with mother, the other half hatched in incubator with Lorenz as the first moving object they saw
Observed that incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere, while control group followed mother
Imprinting has a critical period - a brief few hours after birth. If imprinting doesn't take place within this period, the attachment will never form
Lorenz found a peacock reared in a reptile zoo, whose first moving object after birth was a tortoise, later showed courtship behaviour towards the tortoise as an adult
Harlow's study on contact comfort
Observed that newborn monkeys kept alone in a cage died, but if given a cloth mother to cuddle they survived
Tested the idea that soft cloth serves some of the function of a mother, and found that monkeys always preferred the cloth mother over a plain wire mother, even when the wire mother dispensed milk
Harlow observed that monkeys reared with wire mothers were more dysfunctional, aggressive, less sociable, and less skilled at mating and parenting as adults
Classical conditioning in attachment
The infant forms the strongest attachment to the mother as she is the main provider of food. The infant learns through association that the mother brings pleasure
Operant conditioning in attachment
Babies learn that crying leads to a response from the caregiver of feeding, so crying is reinforced. Negative reinforcement also occurs, as the caregiver is reinforced for feeding the baby to avoid the unpleasant experience of the baby crying
Unconditioned stimulus (UCS)
Stimulus that leads to an innate feeling of pleasure, resulting in an unconditioned response (UCR)
Neutral stimulus (NS)
Stimulus that produces no learnt response before the learning stage
Conditioning
1. Neutral stimulus (NS) becomes paired with UCS
2. Neutral stimulus then becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS)
3. CS produces a conditioned response (CR)
Operant conditioning
Learning through reinforcement (positive, negative, punishment) - behaviour produces pleasant response = likely to be repeated, behaviour produces unpleasant response = less likely to be repeated
Attachment as secondary drive
Hunger is primary drive - innate, motivated to eat to satisfy hunger
Caregivers providing food means primary drive of hunger becomes generalised to them
Attachment is secondary drive - learned by association between caregiver and satisfaction of primary drive
Learning theory explains why babies cry for comfort = crying leads to response from caregiver of feeding - as long as caregiver provides correct response, crying is reinforced
Reinforcement is a 2-way process - babies reinforced for crying, negative reinforcement for caregiver - feeds baby to avoid unpleasant response of crying
Interplay of mutual reinforcement strengthens the attachment
Bowlby's theory of monotropy
Attachment is innate and adaptive - gives species survival advantage
Babies have social releasers (physical and behavioural) that unlock innate tendency of adults to care for them
There is a critical period for attachment formation between baby and caregiver (first 2-2.5 years of life)
Monotropy - the relationship with the primary caregiver is highly significant in emotional development
Internal working model (IWM)
Mental representation of the attachment to the primary attachment figure - serves as a model for what future relationships will look like
Children from functional families tend to have functional families later on, based on their IWM
Children from dysfunctional families tend to have dysfunctional relationships later on, based on their IWM
The Strange Situation
Controlled observation designed to test attachment security by observing 5 key attachment behaviours: proximity seeking, exploration and secure base behaviour, stranger anxiety, separation anxiety, response to reunion
Types of attachment identified in the Strange Situation
Secure attachment (type B)
Insecure-avoidant attachment (type A)
Insecure-resistant attachment (type C)
Disorganised attachment (identified later by Main and Solomon)