In the area of political philosophy, discussions about freedom have been central to understandingthenatureofthestateandindividualrights
While there are various perspectives on freedom, we will explore the ideas of three influential philosophers: Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and John Stuart Mill
We will specifically focus on how these philosophers' notions of freedom align with Isaiah Berlin's categorization of "negative freedom"
Thomas Hobbes
Lived during a tumultuous period in England, marked by civil war and political instability
His major work, "Leviathan" (1651), is a response to the chaos and violence he witnessed
Hobbes' notion of freedom
Freedom is not the absence of constraints but the absence of external impediments to one's desires
True freedom is achieved when individuals surrender their natural rights to a sovereignauthority in a socialcontract, creating a commonwealth where external violence is restrained, allowing for the pursuit of individual interests
Hobbes' conception of freedom aligns with Berlin's notion of negative freedom, where freedom is defined as the absenceofexternal interferenceorcoercion
John Locke
Key figure in the Enlightenment era, which emphasized reason, individual rights, and limited government
His ideas heavily influenced the AmericanandFrenchRevolutions
Locke's notion of freedom
Individuals possess naturalrights, including life, liberty, and property
In the state of nature, individuals have the freedom to exercise these rights without interference
To secure freedom and protect property, individuals enter into a socialcontract to form a civil society with a limitedgovernment
Locke's view of freedom aligns with negative freedom, as it emphasizes the absence of arbitraryauthority and interference with one's natural rights
John Stuart Mill
Utilitarian philosopher and a strong advocate of individual liberty and freedom of thought
Mill's notion of freedom
Individuals should have the maximumpossiblefreedom to pursue their interests, provided that their actions do not harm others
The "HarmPrinciple" states that society can only restrict an individual's freedom to prevent harm to others
Freedom of thought, expression, and individuality are crucial for societal progress and the pursuit of truth
Mill's conception of freedom closely aligns with Isaiah Berlin's negative freedom, as it underscores the importance of freedomfromexternal interferenceandcoercion
Hobbes, Locke, and Mill, while differing in their approaches, all contribute to the understanding of freedom as negative freedom, where the absence of external interference and coercion is central to the concept
These philosophers' ideas have had a profound impact on modern political thought and continue to shape discussions on individual rights and the role of government in safeguarding freedom
Positive freedom is a notion that delves into the idea of self-mastery, self-realization, and the capacity to act autonomously in alignment with one's own authentic values and desires
Buddhist notion of positive freedom
Freedom is achieved by mastering one's desiresandattachments, ultimately attaining Nirvana, a state of complete freedom from suffering
Positive freedom involves the ethical development of one's character, cultivating virtues like compassion, wisdom, and mindfulness
The key to positive freedom lies in detachingoneself from worldly desires and transcending the ego, leading to spiritual liberation and inner peace
Kant's notion of positive freedom
Positive freedom is grounded in moral autonomy, the capacity to act according to rational, self-imposed moral principles
The categoricalimperative guides moral actions, emphasizing that individuals should act in a way that they would will to become a universal law
Positive freedom is about self-legislating moral principles that align with rationality and human dignity, enabling individuals to act freely and morally
Rousseau's notion of positive freedom
Positive freedom is tied to individuals' participation in creating the lawsandnorms of a just society
It involves the capacity to act as a citizen in shaping the rules that govern one's life
Freedom through citizenship: individuals are both freeandequalparticipants in determining the common good, making positive freedom a collective and individual endeavor
The Buddhist notion of liberation from suffering, Kant's emphasis on moralautonomy, and Rousseau's focus on collectiveself-governance all contribute to our understanding of positive freedom
Fromm's notion of positive freedom
Genuine freedom involves self-awareness, responsibility, and the ability to act in alignment with one's authentic self
Positive freedom implies that individuals must engage in continuous self-exploration and self-realization
Societalstructures should support the development of individuals who are capable of responsible and authentic actions
Steiner's notion of positive freedom
True freedom emerges from spiritual development and ethical considerations
Freedom, when aligned with moral principles, leads to harmonious and just social structures
Individual freedom is interconnected with the well-being of the community
Individuals, through their moral development, contribute to the greater good
Fromm's positive freedom emphasizes self-realization and authenticity, while Steiner's holistic approach connects individualfreedom with ethical and spiritual development
Existentialism is a philosophical movement that explores the nature of humanexistence, emphasizing individuality, choice, and authenticity
Existentialist notions of freedom
Freedom is a centraltheme, as existentialists emphasize that humans are condemnedtobefree, meaning that we have the burden of makingchoices and taking responsibility for our actions
True freedom lies in authenticity, which involves making choices in alignmentwithone'svalues, rather than succumbing to external influences or societal norms
The existentialist view of freedom often involves anguish, as individuals grapple with the weight of their choices and the responsibility that comes with them
Sartre's conception of freedom
Radical freedom: Humans are absolutely free to choose their actions, and this freedom extends even to choosing one's own values and ethics
"Bad faith" refers to individuals denyingtheirfreedom and pretending to be bound by external circumstances or social roles
Existentialanguish accompanies freedom, as the weight of choices and the absence of external guidance can lead to anxiety and uncertainty
Sartre's conception of freedom aligns more with negative freedom, emphasizing the absence of predetermined essence and the radical freedom to choose without external constraints
Sartre's freedom differs from Berlin's positive freedom, which emphasizes self-realization and acting in alignment with self-imposed values
Determinism is the philosophical position or belief that all events, including human actions and choices, are predetermined or governed by causallaws
Determinism
The philosophical position or belief that all events, including human actions and choices, are predetermined or governed by causal laws
Kinds of Determinism
Hard Determinism
Soft Determinism
Hard Determinism
It posits that all events, including human actions, are predeterminedandinevitable, driven by factors beyond human control such as fate or a deterministic universe
Soft Determinism
It suggests that while there are factors influencing human behavior, individuals still possess a degree of free will
Major Proponents of Determinism
Leucippus and Democritus
Pierre-Simon Laplace
Arguments for Determinism
Causal Consistency
Scientific Basis
Compatibility with Natural Laws
Quantummechanics introduced the concept of indeterminacy at the subatomic level, challenging strict determinism
Critics argue that determinism threatens humanagency and moralresponsibility, as individuals might not be genuinely responsible for their actions if they are determined by external causes
Freedom
The capacity of individuals to make choices and act according to their ownwill, free from external coercion or constraints