the laws were valued by the landed aristocracy as they ensured that farming remained profitable
disliked by the poor as they led to high bread prices
unpopular with the industrialists
When was the Anti Corn Law League created?
1839
Anti Corn Law League 1839:
created and led by the radical businessmen -> Richard Cobden and John Bright
they were textile manufacturers
originated in Manchester -> worse than the south
devoted to free trade ideas
wanted to repeal the corn laws
believed the aristocratic government did not care about industry + industrial workers who suffered from the continuance protectionist law
How were the corn laws operating:
initially introduced in 1815 -> foreign wheat allowed after British wheat reached 80s per quarter
amended in 1828 -> sliding scale -> tax on imports went down to 1s
Whig Charles Villiers made attempts to abolish the law every year from 1837-1845
1842: Peel set the import taxes down at 20s when the British grain fetched up to 51s ---> imports cheaper than previously
Arguments used by the Anti Corn Law League:
corn laws went against free trade
workers needed cheaper bread
wages were pushed up for people to afford bread -> dismay of the manufacturers
restricting imports meant other countries didn't buy British Goods
benefited the aristocratic elite -> didn't reflect the new economic realities
CONTEXT:
1845 -> Irish Potato Famine
widespread hardship -> famine in Britain
called the "hungry forties"
freer importation of food was called for
Was the ACLL's stance justified:
aristocracy had shown they were willing to change the law
unlikely there was foreign corn available --> similar climates to Britain --> experienced famine too
expensive to import food
suspectedwage cuts if the law is repealed -> Chartists didn't like the ACLL
make British agriculture unprofitable which was still the largest sector of the economy
ACLL strategies:
raised money from the middle-class supporters
mass meetings
petitions
publicity and pamphlets
Was the league successful:
corn laws repealed
But
limited impact in getting representation in Parliament
other factors such as the Irish famine, declining importance in agriculture and Peel's inclination towards free trade
Why did Peel repeal the Corn Laws:
ACLL pressure
irish famine
commitment to free trade
cabinet support (apart from Lord Stanley)
support of wellington in the lords
outcome of the royal commission into the issue in 1842
What were the corn laws:
protect British agricultural industries as during the Napoleonic Wars, landowners borrowed money to turn wasteland into farms to stop being relient on France
agriculture was still the biggest employer
1816-1817 -> price of bread increased by 40%
Formation of the ACLL:
banned the import of foreign corn, until British corn reached 80s
Huskisson introduced a sliding scale
1830-1835 -> harvests were fairly low
1839 -> increased as unemployment increased
strongest in manchester -where the group started-
the aristocracy and landowners benefitted, the manufacturers and working class suffered
1835 -> 7d
1839 -> between 10d and 13.5d
Prices of bread
Industrialists had to pay higher wages and lose profits so their workers could afford food
Arguments for abolishing the corn law:
un christian to restrict the trade
stimulus to the economy -> once bread prices fell, workers real wages would increase
encouraged British farmers to become more competitive -> european nations would buy British goods
Arguments against abolishing the corn law:
influx of cheap foreign corn would lead to mass unemployment within the agriculture sector
lead to overcrowding the in the urban areas
dependent on foreign corn
charists saw the abolishment as a Capitalist plot
Methods of the League:
leaflets targeted the middle class as they could vite
12 mps -> 1845
strong leadership
Chartists disliked the league as they thought wages for the working class would decrease
co-operation with Daniel O'Connell
raised £100 000 in 1844
Stages of repeal: pt1
first two years, very little progress as there was violent opposition from the league
1841 election -> abolitionist mps made some impacts -> Peel reduced the sliding scale. Lull in campaign till 1845.
1842 - 1845 (before Irish Potato Famine), Peel decided that the corn laws were no longer effective, and Farmers had to be able to maintain their profits
Cobden delivered a speech in the Commons in March 1845 -> Peel could't argue saying to an MP "You must answer this for I cannot"
Summer of 1845 -> IrishPotato plant was ruined by a blight and this was their main meal
Stages of Repeal: pt2
Peel arranged for the USA to sell £160 000 worth of grain at 1d per pound to the Irish -> wasn't enough
English and Scottish crops failed
Peel used the Irish Potato Famine as an excuse to force repeal -> Failed and Peel resigned in December 1844
Russell failed to form a Whig Government, Peel recalled who won over most the cabinet but not the party
Repeal Bill would phase the Corn Laws out over 3 years.
Five Month debate -> 2/3s revolted against Peel accusing him of Breaking promises
The Repeal Bill passed the Commons May 1846 only with Whig support
Stages of Repeal: pt3
went through the Lords and became law in June
Peel resigned after Disraeli combined with the Whigs and Irish MPs
Effects:
no dramatic fall in the Wheat prices, no vast inflow of European wheat or North America so British wheat were kept steady
didn't help the Irish -> famine continued to 1848 with millions dying, and cholera epidemic breaking out in 1846 -> emigration to the USA
reduce duties on goods from Britain and encouraged trade
split the tories
Torys Splits 1846:
Peelites => Peel, Gladstone and Herbert and other leading conservatives broke away formed their own Parliamentary group, more reform minded and intellectual -> very small
Rump Conservatives => Stanley and Disraeli, real talent left and Disraeli became PM twice
The corn laws were needed after the napoleonic wars but were outdated