robbery

Cards (23)

  • Legislation for robbery
    Section 8 of the Theft Act 1968
  • Actus reus of robbery

    A completed theft and force or threat of force
  • Mens rea of robbery
    Mens rea for theft and intention to use force to steal
  • S.1 of the Theft Act 1968
    Theft is the dishonest appropriation of property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive
  • R v Zerei
    All elements of theft must be present
  • S.3(1) of the Theft Act 1968 (appropriation)

    Appropriation is any assumption of the rights of the owner
  • R v Vinall
    D needs to assume at least one of the owner's rights
  • R v Hinks
    Gifts are appropriation
  • S.4(1) of the Theft Act 1968 (property)

    Property is money, real property, things in action, personal property and other intangible property
  • Oxford v Moss
    Confidential information is not property
  • R v Turner (No 2)
    An owner has possession and control over property
  • R v Webster
    An owner may have proprietary interest
  • R v Hall
    Property received under an obligation is treated as belonging to another
  • AGR (No.1 of 1983)

    Property may be received by mistake
  • Exceptions to dishonesty
    - D has the right to deprive someone of property (R v Robinson)
    - D would have consent from the other if they knew of the appropriation (R v Holden)
    - The owner of property cannot be reasonably found (R v Small)
  • R v Barton and Booth

    Test for dishonesty:
    1. What were D's genuine beliefs?
    2. Would the ordinary and reasonable person consider this dishonest?
  • R v Lloyd
    Borrowing is not theft/robbery unless the period of time and circumstances change, making it equivalent to an outright taking
  • AGR (No.1 and No.2 of 1979)

    Conditional intent is sufficient
  • R v Hale
    Force or threat of force must be immediately before or at the time of the theft
  • B and R v DPP
    Force or threat of force can be on any person
  • R v Dawson and James
    The force can be small
  • R v Mohan
    Direct intent
  • R v Woolin
    Oblique intent