Anaerobes are the dominant members of normal human microbiota, predominantly residing on mucosal membranes of oralcavity, gastrointestinal tract, and femalegenitaltract
In the colon, the concentration of anaerobes reaches up to 99% of the total bacterial burden
Clostridium, Pepetostreptococcus, Fusobacterium and Bacteroid species are the culturable anaerobes however many of the anaerobes are found to be uncultivable by conventional laboratory techniques known so far
Collection and transport of materials for anaerobic culture
1. Obtained with a needle and syringe
2. Placed in an anaerobic transport tube containing oxygen-free carbon dioxide or nitrogen
3. Injected through the rubber stopper in the transport tube and remains in the anaerobic environment until processed
Anaerobic cultivation methods
Differ from the classic methods for aerobic cultivation
It is necessary to prevent molecular oxygen (O2) exposure as O2 is toxic to anaerobic micro-organisms to varying degrees
Procedures and technical requirements for handling strictly anaerobic micro-organisms often prevent the cultivation of these organisms in most micro labs
Anaerobic jar setup
1. Commercially available hydrogen and carbon dioxide generator envelope (GasPak)
2. Evacuation and replacement of air with an oxygen-free mixture of 80% nitrogen, 10% hydrogen, and 10% carbondioxide
Pasteur effect
The substrate uptake rate increases under anaerobic conditions compared to aerobic conditions to produce the same amount of biomass
Hungate tubes, Balch tubes, Serum bottles
Commonly used culture vessels for anaerobes
Closed with butyl stoppers and sealed
Larger volume cultivation vessels
Modified bottle with neck
Schott bottle
Gassing of anaerobic cultures
1. Repeated gassing is necessary as the gaseous substrate in the headspace is consumed
2. Constant flow of oxygen-free gas over the surface of the medium is necessary when vials are opened to avoid exposure to oxygen
Anaerobic glove box
Required for strictanaerobicmanipulation of some organisms
Roll tube method
1. Stoppered test tube containing oxygen free gas and a thin layer of pre-reduced agar medium
2. Inoculated with a loop while the tube is rotated to produce a spiral track on the agar surface
3. Flushed with a stream of carbon dioxide to prevent entry of air
Cultivation of strict anaerobes in microbiology laboratory
Challenging as it demands highly equipped systems with strictanaerobiosis and reducedculturemedia
Most anaerobic species are slow growing (can take up to 14 days to grow) and many are inactive for certain biochemical tests
Quick anaero-system
1. Disposable anaerobic gaspack
2. Disposable cultureenvelope, a sealer and a reusable rack
3. Catalyst unit with palladium-coatedalumina pellets
Anaerobic jar and gas pack
1. Inoculated plates or tubes placed inside with gasgeneratorsachet and indicatorstrip
2. Chemicals in sachet react to produce hydrogen and carbon dioxide gas
Replacement of atmospheric oxygen with O2-free gases and usage of reducing agents in culture media are useful steps to further facilitate the cultivation of anaerobes
Six well plate method
1. Works together with the AnaeroPack System
2. Shown to be a better technique for culturing strict anaerobes like methanogens, sulfate reducing bacteria and hydrogen-producing syntrophs
Comparing the growth of anaerobes, organisms showed better growth in Quick Anaero-system, but the anaerobic jar is adequate to recover clinically significant anaerobes
The extremely oxygen-sensitive bacteria of the microflora apparently are not associated with infectious processes
Non-culture methods for anaerobic identification
16S rDNA sequencing
qRT-PCR
FISH
MALDI-TOF
Immunological assays (ELISA, Lateral flow)
Antibiotics are a mainstay of treatment for anaerobic pathogens, and resistance is becoming a problem
Anaerobic pathogens are generally more difficulttoculture than aerobic bacteria, and most antimicrobials have been developed using aerobicassays
In the past, anaerobic pathogens were often reported only with broad terms, but now they are often being reported using genus and species names
Anaerobe susceptibility testing and reporting not only continue to remain relevant, but they are also likely to increase in demand as clinical microbiology laboratories improve technologically
c jar
Adequate to recover clinically significant anaerobes
Non culture methods
16S rDNA sequencing
qRT-PCR
FISH
MALDI-TOF
Immunological assays for ID of foodborne pathogens and toxins
ELISA
Lateral flow
Antibiotics are a mainstay of treatment, and, as with aerobic pathogens, resistance is becoming a problem
Reporting of anaerobic pathogens
In the past, they were often reported only with broad terms such as "Gram positive anaerobe"
Now they are often being reported using genus and species names
Anaerobe susceptibility testing and reporting not only continue to remain relevant, but they are also likely to increase in demand as clinical microbiology laboratories improve technologically
Why do anaerobic susceptibility testing (AST)
We have good empirical antibiotics
Anaerobes are often present in polymicrobial aerobic/anaerobic infections or mixed with other anaerobes, making it difficult to obtain pure cultures for AST
In such cases, it is helpful to know the predicted anaerobic susceptibility patterns based on information about strains circulating in the local region
AST methods
Brothmicrodilution for the B.fragilis group
Agardilution for all anaerobes, including the B. fragilis group
Disk diffusion is not suggested by the CLSI as a test method for anaerobes due to inaccurateresults and poorcorrelation with the agar dilution method
CLSI is now undertaking studies to re-evaluate whether broth microdilution can be performed for anaerobes other than the B. fragilis group, but results for other anaerobes, such as C. difficile, do not look promising
AST interpretation
Careful attention must be placed on the breakpoints applied to the datasets, because breakpoints can differ between breakpoint-setting organizations
Patterns of resistance that deserve close attention due to rising rates
Resistance to the β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations among the B. fragilis group
Increasing clindamycin resistance among all anaerobes
Metronidazole resistance is no longer limited to the B. fragilis group, as it now includes Gram-positive cocci and bacilli
Resistance of Clostridium to vancomycin
In most cases, infections with anaerobic Gram-positive cocci are polymicrobial, thus providing AST results for them may not be as critical as for the more resistant anaerobic Gram-negative bacteria, such as B. fragilis
Anaerobic Gram-positive cocci are generally considered susceptible to
Penicillin
Piperacillin-tazobactam
Meropenem
Metronidazole
Resistance patterns in anaerobic Gram-positive cocci
Changes to penicillin-binding proteins may account for the elevated MICs to penicillin
Resistance to clindamycin is due to methylation of 23S rRNA at the site of drug action in the 50S subunit of ribosomes
Anaerobic non-spore-forming Gram-positive bacilli
"Eubacterium" group
Actinomyces
Cutibacterium
Propionibacterium
Lactobacillus
Eggerthella lenta
Bifidobacterium
Anaerobic non-spore-forming Gram-positive bacilli
They are usually susceptible to β-lactams (penicillins, cephalosporins, cephamycins, carbapenems, β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations)
No CLSI clinical breakpoints exist for vancomycin with anaerobes, but it shows good invitro activity against them
Many are intrinsically resistant to metronidazole
Surveys have shown approximately 7% resistance of C. acnes to clindamycin