A potential threat to human life and property caused by an event
Types of hazards
Human caused
Natural (natural hazards)
An event will only become a hazard when it is a threat to people
A disaster will only occur when a vulnerable population (one that will be significantly disrupted and damaged) is exposed to a hazard
Degg's model
Represents the concept that if the population is notvulnerable, the hazard will not have a significant effect, thus the event will not be disastrous
Major types of geographical hazard
Geophysical hazards caused by land processes, majorly tectonic plates (e.g. volcanoes)
Atmospheric hazards caused by atmospheric processes and the conditions created because of these, such as weather systems (e.g. wildfires)
Hydrological hazards caused by water bodies and movement (e.g. floods)
Hazards can also be classed as a mixture of these geographical processes
Hydrometeorological hazards
Hazards that are both atmospheric and hydrological
Hazardperception
People have different viewpoints of how dangerous hazards are and what risk they pose
These perceptions are dependent on lifestyle factors which include economic and cultural elements
Wealth
The financial situation of a person will affect how they perceivehazards
Wealthier people may perceive a hazard to be smaller as they are less vulnerable, but they may also view a risk as greater as there is more risk of property damage and financial loss than someone less wealthy
Experience
Someone who has experienced more hazards may be more likely to understand the full effects of a hazard
There are also studies suggesting that people who have experiencedhazards are likely to have an optimistic and unrealistic outlook on future hazards, almost like a 'lightning never strikes the same place twice' mentality
Education
A person who is more educated about hazards may understand their full effects on people and how devastating they can be and have been in the past
Religion and beliefs
Some may view hazards as put there by God for a reason, or being part of the natural cycle of life etc. so may not perceive them to be negative
Mobility
Those who have limited access to escape a hazard may perceive hazards to be greater threats than they are
Human responses to hazards
Passive (fatalism - hazards are uncontrollable natural events, and any losses should be accepted as there is nothing that can be done to stop them)
Active (prediction, adaptation, mitigation, management, risk sharing)
Prediction
Using scientific research and pastevents in order to know when a hazard will take place, so that warnings may be delivered and impacts of the hazard can be reduced
Adaptation
Attempting to live with hazards by adjusting lifestyle choices so that vulnerability to the hazard is lessened
Mitigation
Strategies carried out to lessen the severity of a hazard
Management
Coordinated strategies to reduce a hazard's effects, including prediction, adaptation, mitigation
Risk sharing
A form of community preparedness, whereby the community shares the risk posed by a natural hazard and invests collectively to mitigate the impacts of future hazards
New Zealand is an example of where risk sharing has worked as a multi-hazard environment under threat from earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanoes, and weather-related hazards
The cost of these hazards in New Zealand are huge; the Canterbury Earthquake (2010) alone cost the country 20% of it's national GDP
There are now attempts in New Zealand to share the risk by insurance investment, so strategies can be put in place before the disasters rather than investing more in a clean up
Incidence
Frequency of a hazard
Low incidence hazards may be harder to predict and have less management strategies put in place, meaning the hazard could be more catastrophic when it does eventually occur
Low incidence hazards are usually (but not always) more intense than high incidence hazards
Distribution
Where hazards occur geographically
Areas of high hazard distribution are likely to have a lot of management strategies, and those living there will be adapted to the hazardous landscape because it dominates the area more so than in places with low hazard distribution
Intensity
The power of a hazard i.e. how strong it is and how damaging the effects are
Magnitude
The size of the hazard, usually this is how a hazard's intensity is measured
Magnitude and intensity are not interchangeable terms
Level of development
Economic development will affect how a place can respond to a hazard, so a hazard of the same magnitude may have very different effects in two places of contrasting levels of development
Even if the hazard is identical, an area with a lower level of development is less likely to have effective mitigation strategies as these are costly
There are many high income countries that are not as prepared for natural hazards as they should be, meaning they lack the management strategies for an event
In Canada where wildfires have been increasing over the last few years (as a result of climate change), less money and resources have been available for earthquake and tsunami preparation
Even detailed evacuation routes and tsunami sirens are not available in popular tourist beaches such as Vancouver Island or Pacific Rim National Park in Canada
Text message systems are available to act as a warning system to suggest people to evacuate, but many people switch their phonesoff at night, reducing the effectiveness
Overall, level of development may not have the biggest part to play in a hazard, and it is more to do with how these countries use their development for mitigation