Localism: Local governments stay separate & provide services for own communities
Functional consolidation: Consolidating services but not governments
Regionalist arguments for consolidation
Reducing costs with economies of scale
Suburbanites shouldn't get to free-ride
Clear lines of responsibility
Methods of coordination & consolidation
Government consolidations
Municipal Annexation
Councils of Governments
Interjurisdictional agreements
Municipal Annexation in Texas
Home rule cities had broad power to annex adjoining territory in their extraterritorial jurisdiction (EJT).
Post-war growth of suburbs leads to concern for "annexation abuse"
Municipal Annexation Act (1963) imposed reasonable limitations to promote orderly growth
Since 1996, a succession of Texas laws have curbed cities' annexation power
Localist arguments for fragmentation
Locals get to keep unique community identity
Decentralization of power
local have more access to govt, and more effective participation
Can retain control of funding, especially for schools
Tiebout Model
Governments are producers of public services, citizens or residents are consumers
Fragmented government is an opportunity, as local governments exist in a marketplace offering various services for various prices, and persons & businesses "vote with their feet" & relocate to preferred community
Increasingly, U.S. metropolitan regions are primary drivers of economic growth
Government helps manage problems of collective action, but there is no overarchingregional government
No legal basis for such a regional government
No tradition of regional governance, either
Home rule cities have unilateral annexation, which means withoutvotersconsent