The legal process of resolving a dispute or deciding a case
Adjudicator
Considers information presented and renders a decision on the basis of that information (e.g. a judge/Magistrate)
Types of disputes handled or resolved through adjudication
Disagreements between private parties (single-persons, individual entities, or corporations)
Disagreements between private parties and public officials
Disagreements between public officials and/or public bodies
Requirements for full adjudication include requisite notice to all interested parties and an opportunity for all parties to have their evidence and arguments heard
Adversary system
A system where each side to a dispute presents its best opinion and then a neutral decision-maker determines the facts and applies the law
Inquisitorial system
A legal system where the court or a part of the court is actively involved in investigating the facts of the case
Differences between adversary and inquisitorial legal systems
Adversary system: Determine innocence or guilt
Inquisitorial system: Determine the truth
In an adversary system, the opposing sides act as adversaries who compete to convince the judge and jury that their version of the facts is the most convincing
In an inquisitorial system, the judge, as investigating magistrate, conducts an inquiry that involves the questioning of witnesses and suspects, the issue of search warrants and an examination of the evidence with the aim of discovering both incriminating and exculpatory evidence
An adversarial system protects against wrongful convictions by ensuring that the process is slanted in favour of the defendant in the belief that it is better for ten guilty men to walk free than for one innocent man to be imprisoned
An inquisitorial system may lead to an erroneous conclusion that results in the wrong individual being tried, where the presumption of innocence is eroded
Judicial interpretation
The application and interpretation of laws by the judicial branch, which is binding in much the same way as judicial development through case-law
Case law
Law that is based on judicial decisions
How case law is developed
1. A case comes before a court
2. Parties present evidence
3. Court refers to other rulings and court opinions
4. Court issues a decision
Unreported judgment
A written judgment that has not yet been published in a law report
Reported judgment
A written judgment that has been published in a law report
The UK House of Lords (formerly the highest court in the UK) was traditionally bound by its own earlier decisions, but in 1964 it declared it could overrule its previous decisions
Stare decisis
The principle that a court must follow and apply the law as set out in the decisions of higher courts in previous cases
Types of case precedent
Binding precedent (lower courts must follow decisions of higher courts)
Persuasive precedent (lower courts may consider decisions of other courts)
Doctrine of precedent
The principle that lower courts must follow the decisions of higher courts in similar cases, to ensure certainty, consistency and clarity of the law
The hierarchy of courts means lower courts are bound by the decisions of higher courts in similar cases
Binding precedent
Provides consistency and certainty in the law
Promotes the expectation that the law is just
Enhances efficiency by guiding judges in resolving disputes
Persuasive precedent
A precedent established by a lower court that may be considered but is not required to be followed
Distinguishing a case precedent
Showing that the facts or legal issues in the current case are different from the precedent, so it does not apply