A business model where a company (the franchisor) grants another party (the franchisee) the right to use its brand, products, and business systems in return for a fee
Company decides it has a good thing going
Wants to expand but doesn't want to run all the new locations
Company is short on money for expansion
Doesn't want to employ a bunch of local workers
Company wants the person in charge of each location
To be someone special, with skin in the game
Franchisee wants to start a business
Knows the local market, has some money to invest or can qualify for a loan, but not enough to buy property, fix it up, or equipment, and maybe not enough for much marketing, doesn't know the industry very well and would rather not go it alone
Franchise model
1. Company gives franchisee what she needs to hit the ground running
2. Franchisee takes the company's training course
3. Franchisee pays an initial fee for the franchise
Franchise model
Depends on a good brand
Requires consistency (same thing at every location, cashiers wearing same logo, menus offering same food prepared the same way)
Customers remain loyal to the brand no matter where they go
Franchise agreement
Rules for a franchisee, covering everything from operating hours to where she buys supplies
Requires franchisees to pay royalties, typically 5-10% of location sales
There's no guarantee the franchisee will flourish, franchisees go belly-up about as often as they do well
Company and franchisees don't always see eye to eye
Company might impose higher royalty, limit flexibility in finding supplies and setting prices, franchisee can start to feel overburdened
If franchisee doesn't sign on and follow the rules
Company might take over the franchise, franchisee might lose her business
Company has reasons to write rules and enforce them
Making all franchisees buy from the same supplier can help bring down cost, higher fees can fund more advertising, company wants franchisees to follow standard rules to prevent freeloading on the brand
Franchise employees
Not known for earning big bucks
Economists disagree on why franchise employees earn low wages
When a company franchises
It's adding extra owners, meaning more people taking slices of the pie, so there's more pressure to cut costs like wages, leaving less money for the workers
Franchise model claims to be more efficient
Can mean lower prices for consumers and more consumption, so more production and more jobs
Other side claims franchising leaves workers with less money for buying stuff
Means less consumption, less production, and fewer jobs