Quantitative methods (questionnaires, structured interviews, official statistics)
Tend to be reliable and representative due to standardised questions and large sample sizes
Quantitative data
Allows measurement of patterns and trends over time
Quantitative methods are often practically cheap and quick to conduct, allowing large sample sizes</b>
Researchers doing the research will be asking the same stuff in the same order in the same way of everybody and that doesn't change and that's like a big benefit to this type of data
Standardized questions
Questions that are the same and don't change depending on who you speak to or who's interviewing
Researcher
They are at arm's length from the participants, they can't ask them to elaborate on their answers, they just ask a question and get the answer
Quantitative methods
Chosen because they tend to be practically quite cheap and quite quick to do, which means you get a really big sample size
The bigger the sample size, the more likely it is to be representative of the broader population
Ethically, there are very few things that can go wrong with quantitative methods, you just need to get informed consent
If you have high reliability
You are likely to have low validity
Low validity
The questions asked through questionnaires and structured interviews tend not to reveal the truth or get to the heart of an issue
Quantitative data provides patterns and trends, but doesn't provide qualitative data to understand how or why something happens
Quantitative methods can have access issues getting to the right people, and tend to have poor response rates
Qualitative methods
Have high validity but low reliability
Qualitative sample sizes
Tend to be smaller, but provide more depth and detail
Qualitative methods
Are very flexible, allowing the researcher to probe and identify new things they hadn't thought of
Qualitative methods
Are unreliable and not representative, but aim to provide a deep understanding of a small group
Qualitative research is very time-consuming and expensive compared to quantitative methods
Ethical issues with qualitative methods include deception and lack of informed consent, particularly with covert observation
Observation as a research method can be overt (participant) or covert (non-participant), each with their own strengths and weaknesses
Strengths of observation
Provides highly valid, detailed, qualitative data as the researcher sees things firsthand
Allows the researcher to get involved and gain a better understanding
Weaknesses of observation
Low reliability as it is difficult to repeat and the results are subjective
Ethical issues, particularly with covert observation where informed consent is not obtained
Observation and qualitative methods are often used to research 'hard to reach' groups in society