Br-Ca

Cards (43)

  • HER2 therapy resistance

    The majority of women with HER2+ breast cancer will respond to trastuzumab and/or other HER2-targeted therapies
    • Fewer than half of patients with HER2+ mBr-Ca initially respond to trastuzumab, however the majority of these will experience tumour progression
    • Many patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treated with trastuzumab also experience recurrence
  • Trastuzumab resistance
    • A constitutively active truncated form of HER2 receptor that has kinase activity but lacks the extracellular domain and the binding site of trastuzumab is originated from metalloprotease-dependent cleavage of the full-length HER2 receptor
    • Trastuzumab does not bind to p95HER2 and therefore has no effect against it
    • The remaining intracellular domain of p95HER2 has operational kinase domains and can be targeted by the TK inhibitor lapatinib
    • Epitope masking by MUC4 or CD44/polymeric hyaluronan complex
    • Trastuzumab binding stabilises and activates PTEN and consequently down-regulates the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway
    • When PTEN function is lost, PI3K remains constitutively active regardless of binding of trastuzumab to HER2
    • Genomic aberrations in the PI3K pathway produce constitutive activation which will signal downstream to the nucleus regardless of trastuzumab binding to HER2
    • Increased Akt kinase activity and PDPK1 overexpression have also been implicated with trastuzumab resistance
  • HER family

    • EGFR, HER3 and HER4 can all heterodimerise with HER2
    • Following ligand binding, homo- and hetero-dimeric interactions between the HER family in various combinations induce auto-phosphorylation on the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain
    • HER3 lacks kinase tyrosine activity and relies on HER family for trans-phosphorylation
  • EGFR
    • Activation of EGFR occurs through the binding of ligands: EGF, TGF-α, HB-EGF, amphiregulin, epiregulin, betacellulin, epigen
    • Induces EGFR homo/hetero-dimerisation with HER2,3,4
    • Activation of downstream signalling pathways: PI3K/AKT, Ras/MERK/ERK, PLCγ/PKC, and JAK/STAT
  • EGFR in breast cancer
    • Dysregulation of the EGFR signalling cascade due to overexpression or constitutively activating mutations is well established in cancer
    • EGFR Overexpression is observed in 15% of Br-Ca caused by the EGFR gene amplification and is associated with poor clinical outcome
    • EGFR overexpression can also be triggered by missense mutations, with a higher incidence in hereditary breast cancer
    • EGFR is frequently overexpressed (in at least 50%) of TNBCs and associated with poor prognosis
  • HER3
    • HER3 is the only receptor in the family that is catalytically inactive and requires dimerisation with other members in order to be activated
    • HER3 ligands are: NRG1 and NRG2
    • Activation of downstream signalling pathways: PI3K/AKT, Ras/MERK/ERK
  • HER3 in breast cancer
    • HER3 is the favoured receptor for dimerisation with HER2 and growing evidence supports HER3 as being a required partner in HER2+ breast cancer
    • HER3 overexpression, due to mutations, has been reported in approximately 20–30% of invasive breast carcinomas particularly in ER+ tumours
    • Co-expression of HER3 and HER2 is frequently observed
    • HER3 is associated with shorter disease-free survival of breast cancer patients
  • HER4
    • Ligand-stimulated HER4 can form homodimers or heterodimerise with other HERs which results in trans-autophosphorylation and subsequent activation of downstream signalling cascades
    • HER4 ligands: Neuregulins (NRG1–4), HB-EGF, epiregulin, β-cellulin
    1. Met
    • The c-Met tyrosine kinase receptor and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor, are overexpressed in some HER2+ tumours
    • Its co-expression with HER2 is associated with trastuzumab resistance through sustained Akt activation
  • HPV vaccine protects against HPV 16 and 18, and 6 and 11
  • Pollution levels in the UK tend to be 10X low compared to other countries around the world
  • Sensitivity
    TP / (TP + FN)
  • Define Sensitivity
    Percentage of patients with disease who test positive
  • Define Specificity

    Percentage of patients without disease who test negative
  • Specificity

    TN/ (TN + FP)
  • PPV
    • Percentage of patients with positive test who actually have disease
    • TP / (TP + FP)
  • NPV
    • Percentage of patients with negative test who do not have disease
    • TN / (TN + FN)
  • Measuring Exposure
    Nature: Tobacco Form
    Dose: Quant/Qual., Cigarette p/d, dose per unit of time
    Time: Begin to End, Distribution over time
  • Data Sources
    Questionnaire, Survey, Census, Registries, Records, Bio./Env. Measurements
  • Measuring Outcome
    Patient Report, Clinical Records, Routine Data
  • Measuring Occurrence
    Define, Case, Popul., Time Period.
    Popul. should exclude those w/o risk, Popul. size from which cases originate act as denominator
  • Routine Data

    Inc. Rate, est. w/o direct measure of p-t at risk
  • P-T at Risk
    Used for Rare Disease, and when Popul. is stable throughout period
    Est. by popul. at mid-point of x length of period
  • Incidence
    Unaffected by Rx./Survival. Influenced by Changing Definitions, Improvements in Diagnosis. and Screening. Rises dramatically with age due to build-up of RF. In UK, aged 50-74 account for more than half of new cases
  • Concordance
    Probability of pair of individuals both having the disease, given one of the pair does have the disease.
  • All-Cause Mortality
    No. of Deaths in population/ Total P-T at risk
  • Annual Mortality
    No. of Deaths from disease in Popul. over t/ Mid-Yr Popul
  • MoD Prevalence
    No. of Cases in popul. over t/ Popul. at Same Point
  • MoD Inc. Risk
    No. of New Cases in Popul. over t/ Popul. initially at Risk
  • Rate over T
    No. of New Cases over t/ P-Yrs at Risk
  • Leading Causes of Death WW
    1.Lu-
    2.Colo-
    3.Stomach
    4.Liver
  • Lu-Ca Epidemiology
    2 Most Common Incidence
    Most Common Cancer Rel. Death
  • Lu-Ca Survival
    Female> Male
    1v1.13
  • Lu-Ca Diagnosis Route
    GP Diagnosis (49%) greatest 1-yr survival than ED Route (35%) at 9% survival
  • Lu-Ca Causes
    Smoking (Environmental alone 15% of ppl), Family History, 25-37% w/ parent, 82% w/ sibling, Radon 9%, Occu 13%, Air Pollution
  • Lu-Ca Signs and Symptoms
    Clubbing (-SCLC), Hoarse Voice with Bouine Cough, Facial and Neck Swelling, Loss of Appetite, Unexpected Weight Loss, Chest Pain and Rec. Chest Infections, Pain (Metastasis),, fatigue, monophonic wheeze, >3wks Persistent dyspnoea + cough
  • Lu-Ca Types
    NSCLC: Adenocarcinoma, LC Neurfenda, Squamous Carcinoma
    SCLC (Most aggressive, relapsing)
    Pulmonary Blastoma,
    Adenosquamous carcinoma
  • Curative Treatment Lu-Ca
    Radical RT, CT, Surgery
    SABR: 3-7 fractions at 55-65 Gu over few doses, Peripheral Cancer.
    CHART: 55 Gu for 14 days, 3x per day, centrally placed large cancers
  • Peripheral Cancer
    No Fly Zone
    Pericardial effusion, massive haemoptysis, airway necrosis, Pneumonia
  • Lu-Ca CT
    Induction: Pre-op to downsize tumour-curative
    Neo-Adj: Pre-ope to reduce recurrence risk
    Adj: Post-ope to reduce relapse/met