The majority of women with HER2+ breast cancer will respond to trastuzumab and/or other HER2-targetedtherapies
Fewerthanhalfofpatients with HER2+ mBr-Ca initially respond to trastuzumab, however the majority of these will experiencetumourprogression
Many patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treated with trastuzumab also experience recurrence
Trastuzumab resistance
A constitutivelyactivetruncated form of HER2 receptor that has kinase activity but lacks the extracellular domain and the binding site of trastuzumab is originated from metalloprotease-dependent cleavage of the full-length HER2 receptor
Trastuzumab does not bind to p95HER2 and therefore has no effect against it
The remaining intracellular domain of p95HER2 has operational kinase domains and can be targeted by the TK inhibitor lapatinib
Epitope masking by MUC4 or CD44/polymerichyaluronancomplex
Trastuzumab binding stabilises and activates PTEN and consequently down-regulates the PI3K/Akt signalling pathway
When PTEN function is lost, PI3K remains constitutively active regardless of binding of trastuzumab to HER2
Genomic aberrations in the PI3K pathway produce constitutive activation which will signal downstream to the nucleus regardless of trastuzumab binding to HER2
Increased Akt kinase activity and PDPK1 overexpression have also been implicated with trastuzumab resistance
HER family
EGFR, HER3 and HER4 can all heterodimerise with HER2
Following ligand binding, homo- and hetero-dimeric interactions between the HER family in various combinations induce auto-phosphorylation on the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain
HER3 lacks kinase tyrosine activity and relies on HER family for trans-phosphorylation
EGFR
Activation of EGFR occurs through the binding of ligands: EGF, TGF-α, HB-EGF, amphiregulin, epiregulin, betacellulin, epigen
Induces EGFR homo/hetero-dimerisation with HER2,3,4
Activation of downstream signalling pathways: PI3K/AKT, Ras/MERK/ERK, PLCγ/PKC, and JAK/STAT
EGFR in breast cancer
Dysregulation of the EGFR signalling cascade due to overexpression or constitutively activating mutations is well established in cancer
EGFR Overexpression is observed in 15% of Br-Ca caused by the EGFR gene amplification and is associated with poor clinical outcome
EGFR overexpression can also be triggered by missense mutations, with a higher incidence in hereditary breast cancer
EGFR is frequently overexpressed (in at least 50%) of TNBCs and associated with poor prognosis
HER3
HER3 is the only receptor in the family that is catalytically inactive and requires dimerisation with other members in order to be activated
HER3 ligands are: NRG1 and NRG2
Activation of downstream signalling pathways: PI3K/AKT, Ras/MERK/ERK
HER3 in breast cancer
HER3 is the favoured receptor for dimerisation with HER2 and growing evidence supports HER3 as being a required partner in HER2+ breast cancer
HER3 overexpression, due to mutations, has been reported in approximately 20–30% of invasive breast carcinomas particularly in ER+ tumours
Co-expression of HER3 and HER2 is frequently observed
HER3 is associated with shorter disease-free survival of breast cancer patients
HER4
Ligand-stimulated HER4 can form homodimers or heterodimerise with other HERs which results in trans-autophosphorylation and subsequent activation of downstream signalling cascades
Popul. should exclude those w/o risk, Popul. size from which cases originate act as denominator
Routine Data
Inc. Rate, est. w/o direct measure of p-t at risk
P-T at Risk
Used for Rare Disease, and when Popul. is stable throughout period
Est. by popul. at mid-point of x length of period
Incidence
Unaffected by Rx./Survival. Influenced by Changing Definitions, Improvements in Diagnosis. and Screening. Rises dramatically with age due to build-up of RF. In UK, aged 50-74 account for more than half of new cases
Concordance
Probability of pair of individuals both having the disease, given one of the pair does have the disease.
All-Cause Mortality
No. of Deaths in population/ Total P-T at risk
Annual Mortality
No. of Deaths from disease in Popul. over t/ Mid-Yr Popul
MoD Prevalence
No. of Cases in popul. over t/ Popul. at Same Point
MoD Inc. Risk
No. of New Cases in Popul. over t/ Popul. initially at Risk
Rate over T
No. of New Cases over t/ P-Yrs at Risk
Leading Causes of Death WW
1.Lu-
2.Colo-
3.Stomach
4.Liver
Lu-Ca Epidemiology
2Most Common Incidence
Most Common Cancer Rel. Death
Lu-Ca Survival
Female> Male
1v1.13
Lu-Ca Diagnosis Route
GP Diagnosis (49%) greatest 1-yr survival than ED Route (35%) at 9% survival
Lu-Ca Causes
Smoking (Environmental alone 15% of ppl), Family History, 25-37% w/ parent, 82% w/ sibling, Radon 9%, Occu13%, Air Pollution
Lu-Ca Signs and Symptoms
Clubbing (-SCLC), Hoarse Voice with BouineCough, Facial and Neck Swelling, Loss of Appetite, UnexpectedWeight Loss, Chest Pain and Rec.ChestInfections, Pain (Metastasis),, fatigue, monophonic wheeze, >3wks Persistent dyspnoea + cough