Save
...
Misrepresentation Inducement
3rd Party tests the statement
Attwood v Small (1838)
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Joel Kwayie
Visit profile
Cards (6)
The Seller of a mine
exaggerated claims
about the
potential
The
purchaser's
appointed their own experts who agreed with the seller
The accounts had greatly exaggerated the income generated by the
estate
.
The claimant sought to rescind the contract based on the
misrepresentation
contained in the reports and accounts
Ruling - The claimant was
unsuccessful.
By getting his own experts to check out the
reports
he had not relied on the accounts but his own judgement
Point of Law. If the misrepresentation is not discovered after a third party checks the
facts
, then the statement is not being
relied upon