Save
Water
5.9a Technofix of hard engineering schemes
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Emma
Visit profile
Cards (18)
Positives of mega-dams
contributes to
8-12
% of global energy mix (HEP)
renewable - less reliant on
fossil fuels
can be used for
domestic
,
industry
and
agriculture
can create
multiplier effect
w/ jobs etc.
reduces
water
insecurity (may increase it
downstream
)
Negatives of mega-dams
Disputes
and
political
challenges between nations e.g Grand Renaissance Dam
very
expensive
seismic activity -
20
earthquakes caused by
Three
Gorgers, highest was
6.1
flooding
in local land
displacement
of people
Sustainability of mega-dams
renewable - reduces
coal
reliance due to HEP but
methane
is released (more potent)
60
% of world's
major
rivers
impeded by
dams
Yangtze
dolphin
extinct
due to Three Gorges - decreasing
biodiversity
and disrupting ecosystems
flush
sediment
occasionally -> have to wait to fill up again in which
HEP
is not produced - insecurity and
reliance
causes
uncontrolled floods
and increased erosion due to strength of water and
sediment load.
Grand Renaissance Dam
flooded
1680km2
of forest in North East Ethiopia
displace
20,000
people
$
5-8billion
cost
hold approx 70billion m3 of water - entire annual flow of
Blue Nile
at
Sudan
border
filling of dam will reduce water supply to
Egypt
by
1/3
and reduce arable land - loss of US$ 51 billion
12,000
jobs
Egypt relies on Nile for
95
% of water usage
potential for
conflict
Three Gorges Dam costs
$
25
billion approx cost
Yangtze Dolphin
extinct due to construction
632km2
land flooded
13
cities submerged between Dam and Chongqing
2
million
people displaced
low
water quality due to water pollution
decomposing vegetation produces
methane
18
earthquakes caused (
6.1
highest)
Three Gorges Dam benefits
reduces risk of
water shortages
in
Beijing
generates large quantities of
electricity
-> moving away from
coal reliance
regulates
water flow
architectural
significance -
tourist
attraction and symbol of
power
5000
jobs created in area -> however jobs also lost due to
displacement
Positives of water transfers
diverts water from one
drainage basin
in
surplus
to another in
deficit
reduces water
insecurity
and solves existing
demand
improved human
health
due to better
sanitation
negatives of water transfers for source area
less
water
may increase water
poverty
ecosystem
changes -
degraded
land, lower functioning and productivity due to decreased water supply
pollution
- less opportunity for dilution so pollutants more
concentrated
negatives of water transfers for receiving area
greater
availability
leads to greater
use
+ waste
promotes
/allows unsustainable irrigated farming e. g
agribusinesses
eutrophication
in water courses - polluted water
transferred
to other ecosystems and areas
development in
tourism
and recreation (social positive) but environmental
negative
due to water usage associated with it
general negatives of water transfers
expensive building
and maintenance costs
leakage
in pipes - less effective
increased
stress in source area
current issue solved but may
fail
in future
Costs of China's South-North Water transfer
$US
70
bil
submerge
370km3
of land - water level raised
13
metres due to
construction
300,000
people displaced
water quality at risk due to industrial pollution, particularly
Eastern route
Yangtze basin
already polluted -
Yellow
River undrinkable and scientists fear
ecological disaster
Increase
water stress
in South
Benefits of
China's
South-North
Water
transfer
reduces risk of
water
shortage in
Beijing
boost
economic development
-> show of strength to
TNCs
,
multiplier effect
reduces abstraction of
groundwater
(water table in
Beijing
fell
300
metres since
1970s
)
positives of desalination plants
provides a reliable and
predictable
supply of
water
sustainable
process
negatives of
desalination
plants
expensive
salt waste
can damage
marine
ecosystems
process uses
large
amounts of
energy
desalination plants
extracts
salt
+ solids in
seawater
to enable it to be used for drinking and irrigation
Israel's
desalination
project
five
plants were opened by
2013
, taking water directly from the
Mediterranean
filtered
water put under
high
pressure by
reverse
osmosis
provides over
55
% of Israel's
domestic
water
Pros of Israel's desalination project
Produces up to
600 tonnes
of
potable
water per
hour
Cons of
Israel's
desalination project
each plant requires its own
power station
and adds to CO2 emissions - much of energy used is
solar
produces vast amount of salt/brine which contains
anti-scaling agent