A close two way emotional bond where each person sees the other as important for their own emotional wellbeing
Reciprocity
Both the infant and mother respond to each others needs and each elicits a response
Babies signalling readiness for interaction
1. Alert phases
2. Crying etc.
Mothers responding to infant signals
Respond ~⅔ of the time
Interaction becomes increasingly frequent; involves close attention to verbal signals and facial expressions
Around 3 months
Traditional views - baby has a passive role, receiving care from the adult
Despite this the baby takes an active role; both mother and child initiate interactions
Interactional synchrony
Mother and infant reflect the actions and emotions of each other in a synchronised way
Beginnings of interactional synchrony observed
As young as 2 weeks old
Filmed observations difficult to observe and produce the same pattern of interaction
What is observed is hand movements/change of expressions
Hard to analyse and be certain of the footage and what is taking place from the infants perspective - we cannot be sure of the meaning of these interactions
Interactional synchrony and reciprocity may not explain the purpose of these behaviours
Interactional synchrony can be reliably observed, but may not be particularly useful - does not tell us the purpose
Evidence suggests interactional synchrony and reciprocity are helpful in the development of mother-infant attachment
Attachment figures
Attachment - close two-way emotional bond between 2 individuals which each sees the other as essential for their own emotional security
Attachment
Takes months in humans to develop
Involves proximity, separation distress, and secure-base behaviour
Majority of babies became attached to their mothers
Within ~7 months
75% infants had an attachment with the father established
By 18 months
Role of the father
Associated with stimulation, less so with nurturing
Fathers taking on primary caregiver roles displayed behaviours more commonly associated with mothers
Primary caregiver fathers were found to be more nurturing and would respond more to infant signals
They spent more time smiling and interacting with the infant like primary caregiver mothers than fathers did
Inconsistent findings on the role of the father
Role of father as a secondary caregiver differs from the role of the father as primary
Inconsistent findings, not sure what the distinct role of the father is
Children growing up in single/same sex parent families do not develop any differently than those in heterosexual relationships
Suggests fathers role as a secondary caregiver is not important
Why fathers don't become primary attachments
May be due to traditional gender roles; women expected to be caring/nurturing, men expected to not behave in that way
Research indicates that working mothers may disadvantage children through not being able to have high levels of interactionalsynchrony/reciprocity
This may be due to the presence of work; may restrict opportunities or believed to be an interference with the child's development
Suggests mother shouldn't work after having a child - socially sensitive implications
Schaffer's stages of attachment
Asocial stage (first few weeks), Indiscriminate attachment (2-7 months), Specific attachment (~7 months), Multiple attachments (~1 year old)
Between 25-32 weeks of age ~50% of babies shown signs of separation anxiety
By the age of 40 weeks, 80% of babies had a specific attachment and 30% multiple attachments
Attachments tended to be the caregiver who was the most interactive and sensitive to the babies signals - interactional synchrony and reciprocity
Not necessarily who they spent the most time with
Good external validity - carried out in families homes and observation was done by parents during ordinary activities, and then self reported
Limited sample size - 60 families, all from the same district, skilled working class families and all lived in Glasgow - also outdated
Difficult to observe baby behaviour during the first few weeks of asocial stage due to poor fine motor skills and coordination