Private nuisance

Cards (18)

  • Private nuisance: Unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land coming from neighbouring land
  • Private nuisance = One party affected
  • Public nuisance = Class of people affected
  • The claimant (Hunter v Canary Wharf)
    • Interest in the land affected
    • Either an owner or a tenant
  • The Defendant (Sedleigh Denfield v O'Callaghan)
    Occupier of land may not themselves be responsible but are:
    • Allowing it to occur
    • Not dealing with it
    • Previous owners - New owner responsible 'Adopting nuisance'
  • Natural causes (Leakey v National trust)
    Occupier is aware of but has not dealt. The same principle applies like in sedleigh
  • Private nuisance test:
    1. Whether there is an interference (Direct/Indirect)
    2. Whether the use of land is 'unlawful'
  • Private nuisance test:
    1. Whether there is an interference (direct/indirect) = Unlawful (unreasonable) interference. Not a crime. Examples = Fumes, smell, noise and fire
  • Private nuisance test:
    2. Whether the use of land is 'unlawful' = Locality, duration, sensitivity of the claimant, malice, social benefit, damage and public interests vs human rights
  • Locality = (Hirose Electrical UK Ltd) = How many houses are near a nuisance
    Duration = (Crown river cruises) = How long the nuisance goes on for. Shorter ones don't get convicted unless there is damage
    Sensitivity of claimant = (Robinson v Kilbert) = Something they are dealing with that is sensative. Could cause nuisance
  • Malice = (Hollywood silver fox farm). Malice has the intention to cause harm
    Social benefit = (Miller v Jackson). Everyone agrees and decision would benefit a lot of people.
    Damage = (St Helen's smelting Co) How much damage is caused
    Public interests vs Human rights = (Hatton v UK). More protection to those who cause the nuisance.
  • Defences to private nuisance:
    • Consent
    • Contributory negligence
    • Statutory Authority
    • Prescription
  • Prescription (Sturges v Bridgeman) - Period of time
    20 years without previous complaint, prescriptive right to continue that activity and must have been an actionable nuisance for the duration
  • Statutory Authority (Allen v Gulf oil reforming)
    Many activities now regulated by statue and most effective defence
  • Remedies to private nuisance:
    • Injunctions
    • Damages
    • Abatement
  • Injunctions = Prohibitory - Using force to stop them or take something away. Positive - Told them to stop
  • Damages = Must be argued by the defendant that this is more appropriate than an injunction
  • Abatement = Allows claimant to enter the defendant's property in order to prevent further nuisance