Private nuisance

    Cards (18)

    • Private nuisance: Unlawful interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land coming from neighbouring land
    • Private nuisance = One party affected
    • Public nuisance = Class of people affected
    • The claimant (Hunter v Canary Wharf)
      • Interest in the land affected
      • Either an owner or a tenant
    • The Defendant (Sedleigh Denfield v O'Callaghan)
      Occupier of land may not themselves be responsible but are:
      • Allowing it to occur
      • Not dealing with it
      • Previous owners - New owner responsible 'Adopting nuisance'
    • Natural causes (Leakey v National trust)
      Occupier is aware of but has not dealt. The same principle applies like in sedleigh
    • Private nuisance test:
      1. Whether there is an interference (Direct/Indirect)
      2. Whether the use of land is 'unlawful'
    • Private nuisance test:
      1. Whether there is an interference (direct/indirect) = Unlawful (unreasonable) interference. Not a crime. Examples = Fumes, smell, noise and fire
    • Private nuisance test:
      2. Whether the use of land is 'unlawful' = Locality, duration, sensitivity of the claimant, malice, social benefit, damage and public interests vs human rights
    • Locality = (Hirose Electrical UK Ltd) = How many houses are near a nuisance
      Duration = (Crown river cruises) = How long the nuisance goes on for. Shorter ones don't get convicted unless there is damage
      Sensitivity of claimant = (Robinson v Kilbert) = Something they are dealing with that is sensative. Could cause nuisance
    • Malice = (Hollywood silver fox farm). Malice has the intention to cause harm
      Social benefit = (Miller v Jackson). Everyone agrees and decision would benefit a lot of people.
      Damage = (St Helen's smelting Co) How much damage is caused
      Public interests vs Human rights = (Hatton v UK). More protection to those who cause the nuisance.
    • Defences to private nuisance:
      • Consent
      • Contributory negligence
      • Statutory Authority
      • Prescription
    • Prescription (Sturges v Bridgeman) - Period of time
      20 years without previous complaint, prescriptive right to continue that activity and must have been an actionable nuisance for the duration
    • Statutory Authority (Allen v Gulf oil reforming)
      Many activities now regulated by statue and most effective defence
    • Remedies to private nuisance:
      • Injunctions
      • Damages
      • Abatement
    • Injunctions = Prohibitory - Using force to stop them or take something away. Positive - Told them to stop
    • Damages = Must be argued by the defendant that this is more appropriate than an injunction
    • Abatement = Allows claimant to enter the defendant's property in order to prevent further nuisance
    See similar decks