it is possible to establish objective social facts by using scientific research methods
Doing so will bring us true, objective knowledge of the same type as that found in the natural sciences.
provide the basis for solving social problems and achieving progress.
patterns we observe can all be explained the same way as natural sciences
positivist sociologists
comte
Durkheim
positivists believe that reality exists outside and independently of the human mind:
Nature is made up of objective, observable, physical facts, such as rocks, cells, stars etc, which are external to our minds
likewise, society is an objective factual reality – it is a real ‘thing’ made up of social facts that exists ‘out there’, independently of individuals,
Durkheim - suicide rates
‘real laws are discoverable’ that explain empirical (factual) patterns
discovered cause of suicide through official statistics - due to levels of integration and regulation of an individual
e.g suicide rates for protestants higher than Catholics - because Catholicism was more successful in integrating individuals.
claimed to have discovered a ‘real law’:
induction/ inductive reasoning
involves accumulating data about the world through careful observation and measurement
trying to find evidence that supports a hypothesis
moves from specific observations to broadgeneralisations
induction -> verificationism
verificationism
proving theory to be true from all the observations we have accumulated (induction)
we can claim to have discovered the truth in the form of a general law
induction
observation
observing a pattern
developing a theory/ conclusion
positivists and objectivity
believe we should be detached and objective
should not let subjective feelings, values, prejudices conduct their research
this is because in natural sciences, scientist's values and opinions make no difference to outcome of research
positivists and research methods
employ quantitative methods that allow for maximum objectivity and detachment
e.g lab experiments, closed-ended questionnaires
also produce reliable data that can be peer reviewed by others
allow positivists to discover laws of cause and effect that determine behaviour
keywords
objectivity
empirical evidence / patterns
social facts
quantitative data
value-free
inductive reasoning
verificationism
natural sciences
casual relationships
Objective quantitative research
Positivists believe that as far as possible sociology should take the experimental method used in the natural sciences
this allows the investigator to test a hypothesis in the most systematic and controlled way.
experiments involve examining each possible causal factor to observe its effect
hypothesis
a statement such as ‘A causes B’.
induction / verification process
observation -> finding patterns -> creating theory -> verifying theory
criticism of Durkheim
had values in choosing topic of suicide - friend had died from suicide
difficult to operationalise concepts such as social cohesion and social control (difficult to measure)
criticisms
scientists are actually influenced by values - allowing them to be influenced by external factors such as companies employing them to prove their product is effective
scientists may want to further their own careers and this may involve pursuing particular areas - therefore adding values and subsequently not always objective