A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it
Elements of theft
Appropriation
Property
Belonging to another
Intention of permanently depriving
Sections of Theft Act 1968
S1 - Definition
S2 - Dishonestly
S3 - Appropriation
S4 - Property
S5 - Belonging to another
S6 - Permanently depriving
S7 - Sentence
Appropriation
Assuming any rights of the owner
Taking property away
Treating it as your own
Destroyingproperty
Selling property
Cases on appropriation
R v Morris 1984
Lawrence v MPC 1971
R v Gomez 1993
R v Hinks 2000
Theft Act 1968 covers theft
S1 states: A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestlyappropriatesproperty belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it
S3 defines appropriation as assuming any rights of the owner
Ways appropriation can occur
Taking property away
Treating it as your own
Destroying property
Selling property
Gomez and Hinks
Gomez - consent by false representation
Hinks - accepting a gift can be appropriation
Property
Includes real money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and all other intangible property
Land cannot be property in terms of theft, unless: someone severs part of theland, a tenant takes fixtures and fittings, or someone legally entrusted to the land itself and uses it for their own purpose
Billing v Pill (1951) - land can only be severed if part of the land
Types of money that are property
Bank notes and coins - physical money
Cheques - the paper is the property not the value
Credit and debit cards - plastic
S4 covers property
Things that are property according to Theft Act
Money
Intangible property
Real or personal property
Things in action
All other property
Things that are not property according to Theft Act
Body parts
Wild animals
Dead bodies
Wild plants
Electricity is not property in theft
Information or knowledge is not property - Oxford v Moss
Belonging to another
Possession and control of property
Proprietary right or interest in property
Cases on belonging to another
Webster 2006
R v Turner 1971
Williams v Philips 1975
S5 3 - Property received under an obligation
Where a person receives property from another, and is under obligation to the other to retain and deal with that property in a particular way, the property shall be regarded as belonging to another
Cases on property received under an obligation
Davidge v Burnett
S5 4 - Property received by a mistake
Where a person gets property by another's mistake, and is under an obligation to restore the property then not to return that property may be theft
Cases on property obtained by mistake
A-G's reference (no1 of 1983)
Mens rea
Dishonesty, intention to permanently deprive
It is not dishonest if the defendant believes that he: has a lawful right to deprive the other of it, the other would have consented to the appropriation, or the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps
Ghosh test
Defines what is dishonest, reasonable man test
Intention to permanently deprive
Treating the property as your own regardless of the rights of the owner - R v Velumyl 1989
Borrowing - can be intent to permanently deprive when the 'value, goodness or virtue' has gone out of the property - R v Lloyd 1985
Conditional intent - burglary not theft, only going to take something if there is something worth taking: R v Easom 1971
Ghosh test has been confirmed and precedented by Booth, with Ivey removing the subjective part
The Ghosh test is: 1) Would ordinary, honest, and reasonable people regard the actions of D as dishonest 2) Does D realise that others would regard their actions as dishonest