Making use of both visual (pictures) and auditory (words) encoding to strengthen memory trace
Encoding information both visually and auditorily helps process information synchronously, which aids memory
Aim
The purpose of a study
Hypothesis
A prediction about the relationship between variables
Independent Variable (IV)
The variable that is manipulated by the researcher
Dependent Variable (DV)
The variable that is measured by the researcher
Operationalize
To define the IV and DV in specific, measurable terms
Extraneous variable
Any variable other than the IV that could affect the DV
Confounding variable
A variable that systematically varies with the IV and affects the DV
Experimental designs
Independent measures
Repeated measures
Matched pairs
Independent measures design
Separate groups of participants for each condition of the IV
No order effects
Repeated measures design
Same participants complete all conditions of the IV
Fewer participants needed
Potential order effects
Matched pairs design
Participants in each group are matched on a key characteristic
Tries to balance individual differences and order effects
Sampling methods
Random
Opportunity
Volunteer
Systematic
Stratified
Representativeness
The extent to which the sample reflects the target population
Types of experiments
Lab
Field
Natural
Quasi-experimental
Lab experiment
IV is manipulated by the researcher in a highly controlled environment
Field experiment
IV is manipulated by the researcher in a natural environment
Natural experiment
IV occurs naturally and the researcher observes the effects
Quasi-experiment
IV is not manipulated by the researcher, but groups are compared
get a stratified sample try and represent it but you you're not going to be able to really truly represent how complex the different people are and your sample never truly represent the time population lets you test everyone in later on which again isn't going to happen so again it's all about thing out nothing's perfect every study will choose one of these types and they'll just be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of doing of doing so
Types of experiment
Lab
Field
Natural
Quasi
Lab experiment
IV is manipulated by the experimenter
Good control over the environment
Field experiment
IV is still manipulated by the experimenter
Happens in a more natural environment
Natural experiment
IV is naturally occurring
Experimenter has no control over IV
Quasi experiment
IV is fixed and naturally occurring
Environment is not as important
Internal validity
How confident you can be that the effect on the DV is only caused by the IV
External validity
How well the results can be generalised to the real world
High control in lab experiments
Leads to high internal validity but low external validity
Low control in field experiments
Leads to higher external validity but lower internal validity
Natural experiments
Allow study of topics hard to control, but have more confounding variables and lower reliability
Quasi experiments
Can take place in controlled conditions, but lack random allocation so other factors can affect results
Primary data
First-hand data collected by the researcher
Secondary data
Pre-existing data
Qualitative data
Non-numerical, rich and detailed data (e.g. interviews, diaries, photos)
Quantitative data
Numerical data
Measures of central tendency
Mean, median, mode - types of averages
Mean
Affected by extreme scores
Median and mode
Less affected by extreme scores, but don't take all scores into account
Measures of dispersion
Range, standard deviation - show how spread out the scores are