An end-of-life option that permits certain individuals with a terminal illness to lawfully and voluntarily ask their doctor for prescription medication so they can hasten their death in a peaceful, humane, and dignified manner
Medical procedures that are often considered to go against the inviolability of life include abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, non-voluntary euthanasia, and physician-assisteddeath
When a person's life is intentionally ended without their explicit consent, often in cases where the person is unable to communicate their wishes, such as in the case of severe cognitive impairment
Non-voluntary euthanasia is seen as going against the inviolability of life because it involves making a life-ending decision on behalf of a person without their consent
Physician-Assisted Death is considered to go against the inviolability of life because it involves actively participating in the act of ending a person's life
Involuntary euthanasia can be considered as murder when it is performed on a person who can and would provide informed consent, but does not because they do not want to die or they were not asked
Euthanasia and suicide overlap, but there are several differences. Euthanasia is for medical reasons, while assisted suicide is when a doctor gives a person the means to commit suicide when requested for
Orthothanasia is closely tied to the principles of palliative care, which aims to provide comfort, pain management, and holistic support to terminally ill patients and their families
The intentional act of ending someone's life to relieve suffering, typically done by a physician at the request of a patient who is terminally ill or experiencing unbearable pain
The prolongation of life using medical technology and interventions even when there is no hope of recovery or when the patient's quality of life is significantly compromised
Allowing death to occur naturally without unnecessary medical interventions to prolong life when a person is dying from a terminal illness or in an irreversible vegetative state
Respect for the patient's autonomy and right to self-determination. Patients should be empowered to make informed decisions about their end-of-life care
Healthcare providers must balance the principles of beneficence (doing good) and non-maleficence (avoiding harm) when considering orthothanasia. The goal is to relieve suffering and provide a peaceful death, rather than prolong a life filled with pain and indignity
Ethical frameworks must consider issues of fairness and justice, ensuring that access to orthothanasia and end-of-life care is equitable and not determined by factors such as socioeconomic status or geographic location
The emotional and psychological impact of end-of-life decisions on patients, families, and healthcare providers must be carefully navigated. Open communication, empathy, and support are crucial in this sensitive process