Delayering involves removing one or more levels of hierarchy from the organisational structure.
Downsizing
Downsizing is when a firm closes down or merges aspects of their operations in order to:
reduce costs
rremain competitive in the marketplace
Advantages of delayering
It offers opportunities for better delegation, empowerment and motivation as the number of managers is reduced and more authority passed down the hierarchy.
It can improve communication within the business as messages have to pass through fewer levels of hierarchy.
It can reduce costs as fewer (expensive) managers are required.
It brings managers into closer contact with the business’ customers – which should (in theory) result in better customer service
Disadvantages for delayering
Not all organisations are suited to flatter organisational structures - mass production industries with low-skilled employees may not adapt easily
Delayering can hurt motivation due to job losses, especially if it is just an excuse for redundancies
Disruption may occur as people take on new responsibilities and fulfil new roles
Those remaining managers will have a wider span of control which, if too wide, can damage communication within the business
There is also a danger of increasing the workload of the remaining managers
Delayering may create skills shortages within the business
Centralized management structure
A structure where all decisions are made by senior managers
Decentralized management structure
Decisions are made at the most appropriate level in the business
The success of a management structure is not determined by the structure chosen, but how it is implemented and managed
Clever management can combine centralized and decentralized approaches to get the best of both worlds