Interventionistpolicy in when the government increases intervention in the economy and is activelyinvolved in increasingAS and will in turn increasesrealGDP.
How can increased spending on infrastructure be used as a supply-side policy to influence economic growth?
Improvement in infrastructure will improvegeographicalmobility of labour, increasinglabourproductivity, increasing the quality and quantity of labour as moreworkers can now get to work. This will increaseLRAS, increasingrealGDP and improvingeconomicgrowth. Furthermore, improved geographical mobility will decreaseunemployment.
What is the demand-side benefit of increasing spending on infrastructure?
There may be an increase in consumption for two reasons. The first being because unemployment decreases as a result of improvedgeographical mobility, there is a rise in incomes and as incomes rise consumption by consumers will also increase leading to a rise in AD. Secondly, improved infrastructure means morepeople can travel around to shops so spending and consumption will also increase. As both reasons increaseAD, realGDP increases and sodoeseconomic growth.
Evaluate the use of increased spending on infrastructure as a means to influence economic growth.
There is a risk of crowding out in the short-run.Crowding out occurs when government spending pushes up demand for resources which will increase prices for the four factors of production such as costs for raw materials and rise in wages for labour. In the SR, this rise in prices will increase costs for private-sector firms and disincentives investments and so they have been crowded out. As a result, SRAS will decrease and so will real GDP, reducing economic growth.
How can reduced corporation tax be used as a way to improve economic growth?
If corporationtaxdecreases, firms can retainmore - increasingsupernormalprofits as costsdecrease, this creates an incentive for a rational profit-maximising firm to utilisedynamicefficiency and either expand the business or start a new one.
SR: Increasedentrepreneurship in the economy so an increase in SRAS, increasing; real GDP, economic growth and competition and reducing the general pricelevel
LR: As firms retain more profits, there is increasedfinance available for investments, this increases the state of technology and machinery - increasingproductivity and shifting LRASright. This results in a rise in realGDP and economic growth.
What is the demand-side benefit of reducing corporation tax?
In the LR - an increase in investments will increaseAD and realGDP. Furthermore, as investment in technologyrises, the quality of goods will increase, increasingdomestic and internationalcompetitiveness, so as exportsrise and domesticconsumptionincreases, there will be a furtherincrease in AD and realGDP.
Evaluate the use of reducing corporation tax as a means to influence economic growth.
Reducing corporation tax will come with opportunitycosts for the government. Reducing tax means the governmentreceiveslesstaxrevenue, the opportunitycosts is that there's lessmoneyavailable for the government to spend in other areas such as healthcare and education and potentially reduce the quality of these services - could lead to an inwardshift of LRAS in the LR
How can reducing minimum wage be used as a way to increase growth?
At the minimumwage, there is excesssupply of labour - this is known as real wageunemployment as the wagelevel is set above equilibrium. This means that reducing/removing minimum wage will increasedemand for labour and reduce quality supplied, bringing the wagelevel back to equilibrium. For firms this means a reduction in wage costs and cost of production - shifting SRAS out and increasingreal GDP
Evaluate the use of reduced minimum wage as a means to influence economic growth
- The significance of reduced wages depends on the level of people who are currently being paidminimum wage ( 1.9 million people in the UK) . If their incomesdecreases, they are very likely to reduce their spending and consumption as a result of decreaseddisposableincomes, reducing AD and reducing real GDP. This could have a moresignificant impact on growth than a fall in costs as consumption is the biggest component of AD.
- In the LR: a fall in minimumwage could mean a rise in emigration as workers moveabroad to seek relatively higher wages. As quantity of labourdecreases, LRAS will shiftinwards and decrease the productivecapacity of the economy alongside real GDP.
Deregulation will lowercost of production for a firm, this means producers are morewilling to supplymore a given price and so SRAS will shift right, decreasingpricelevel and increasingrealGDP.
Private investors/shareholders will pressurise companies to profit maximise, creating more incentives to become more efficient and decrease costs - this increases SRAS and real GDP
How can increased spending on education influence economic growth
if the government increases education spending such as subsidising university education, tuition fees (price of education) will decrease, this will increasedemand for universityeducation and the number of students at university will increase. As a result, there will be a higher number of qualifies workers in the labour market and will increase productivity - this will increase LRAS and economic growth
Evaluate the use of increased spending on education as a means to increase in the growth
SR: In the Sr, if there are more students, there will be fewer workers in the labour market. This will decrease labour supply and increasewages, as wage costs rise - the cost of production will also increase and reduce SRAS,reducing economicgrowth.
LR: effect on growth may be limiteddepending on the courses that have been subsidised. e.g. courses such as Theoretical Physics may not contribute a significant amount to growth as they are not used regularly in an office
How can reducing income tax be used as a means to increased economic growth?
Lowerincometax means workerskeepmore of their incomes - increasing incentives to work overtime and more hours, this means that workers will reduce their leisure hours and increase their workhours. This will increaselaboursupply and cause wages to decrease wages and result in decreasedcosts of production and increaseSRAS - leading to economicgrowth
What is the demand-side benefit for reducing income tax?
Decreasingincometax will increase disposable incomes and increased consumption - increasing AD. an increase in AD will increaseprofits for firms who will increasedemand for labour to meet the increased demand, this means evenmorepeople are spending more money and and cycle will repeat - this is known as the positive multiplier effect.
Evaluate the use of reducing income tax as a way of increasing economic growth.
Workers may choose to work fewer hours as they will be keeping more of their incomes, this means that they can reduce their work hours and still pay for necessties and consume the same amunt they used to - this means workers increase their leisure hours and decrease their labour supply.
As labour supply decreases, wages will increase as well as costs of production so firms will choose to decrease SRAS and real GDP as well as limit economic growth
How can reducing benefits increase economic growth?
As benefits are reduced, unemployed workers will have less money to live on increasingincentives to work. This will increase labour supply causing wages to decrease. As wage costsdecrease, cost of production will decrease and increaseSRAS - increasingreal GDP and economic growth
Evaluate the use of reduced benefits to improve growth.
A reduction in benefits means less money transfered to the unemployed and low-income households - they now have reduced disposable incomes and must reduce their spending; this reduces AD, real GDP and economic growth. This can also result in the downwardmultiplier effect andincreases income inequality as the poor will receive less money.
Therefore it may be best that the government reform benefitsrather than reduce them e.g. in 2015, the government reformed disability benefits so only those who really needed it received benefits, this means they still had an income and everyone else was incentivised to find work.
How can increased spending on healthcare improve economic growth?
As the governmentincreasesNHSfunding, this will result in a healthier workforce, increasing productivity and LRAS.ImprovedNHS also means fewer sick days for workers, increasing labour hours and shifting LRAS out again - increasingrealGDP and economic growth
Evaluate the use of increased healthcare spending as a way to improve the economy
The significance of increased healthcarespendingdepends on the quality of the spending. There's a risk that a lot of funding may be used towards admin and paperwork (known as bureaucracy). Furthermore, money could also be spent inefficientlyrather than going towards effective technology and treatments - has no effect on productivity so growth in the LR may be limited