Save
Criminology - Theories
Interactionist (Labelling) Theory
Howard Becker - Labelling Theory
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
evie
Visit profile
Subdecks (1)
Supporting Theory - Edwin Lemert
Criminology - Theories > Interactionist (Labelling) Theory > Howard Becker - Labelling Theory
4 cards
Cards (9)
Howard
Becker - Labelling Theory
They are concerned with not only how and why certain acts become
labelled
or
defined
as criminal, but also how societies reactions causes this.
Howard
Becker
- Labelling Theory
Becker
stated once a person was labelled a ’delinquent/
deviant’
they would become it.
If an individual is told they ‘are’ something enough, through the
‘self-fulfilling prophecy’
they will replicate that behaviour.
This label then becomes them and is known as their
‘master
status’.
Therefore, they believe that we
‘socially
construct’ what is deviant and
criminal.
How could this lead to
selective
law
enforcement
?
Becker states agents of
social
control,
use their own
discretion
and
selective
judgement
when dealing with illegal behaviours.
Police operate with
pre-existing
conceptions
and
stereotypes
with who they select to stop and search.
Advantages of Interactionist Theory
It shows how law is often enforced in a
discriminatory
way. it highlights the
consequences
of
labelling.
Highlights weaknesses in
official statistics
which allow
bias
in
law
enforcement.
Highlights the role of the
media
in defining and creating
deviance
and for producing
moral panics.
Disadvantages
of Interactionist Theory
Fails to explain
why
deviant
behaviour
happens
in the first place. There’s no
acceptance
that some people may just
choose
deviance.
Ignores the
victim
of crime and focuses on the
‘criminal’.
There’s potential to
romanticise
crime.
Criminals do not need a
label
to know what they are doing wrong. Also, labelling does
not
always lead to the
self-fulfilling prophecy.
See all 9 cards