Why is it difficult to study the Precolonial Philippines compared to other historical periods?
Due to lack of written sources
What are the materials produced by the Spanish in the early 16th century which historians are compelled to rely?
Diaries, dictionaries, and illustrations
Scholars utilize sources from archaeology, folklore, and oral tradition in studying Precolonial Philippines. What are the two types of these archaeological sources?
Fossils (biological) and artifacts (manmade)
Mythology can describe how people view and perceive the world.
TheWavesofMigration Theory used only pieces of artifacts and categorized them according to level of sophistication.
The Waves of Migration Theory is proposed by Henry Otley Beyer, the founder of UP Department of Anthropology, in 1947.
The categories of artifacts according to sophistication for the Waves of Migration Theory are (a) least sophisticated, e.g., stone, (b) sophisticated, e.g., polished stone, and (c) most sophisticated, e.g., wood and metal.
According to the Waves of Migration Theory, there were three distinct waves of migrants in the Philippines, corresponding to each category of artifacts:
Negritos - least sophisticated
Indones - sophisticated
Malay - most sophisticated
What makes the Waves of Migration Theory problematic?
We cannot conclude about their physical appearances based just from the sophistication of artifacts.
TheWavesofMigration Theory was the very first attempt to explain the peopling of the Philippines.
The Core Population Theory was proposed by Felipe Landa Jocano in the 1960s.
The CorePopulation Theory recognized the scarcity of pertinent sources, i.e., artifacts, debunking the conjecture of the Waves of Migration Theory.
C. P. Theory proposes that a "core population" is developed independently in the Philippines under three phases before external influences:
Formative - stone
Incipient - bronze
Emergent - iron
The problem of the C. P. Theory is that it's "too simplistic."
The Austronesian Migration Theory proposed that all-present day native Austronesian speakers came from a single ancestor called the Proto-Austronesians.
The family of Austronesian languages was discovered due to the categorization of languages according to linguisticsimilarities.
The A. M. Theory explains the peopling of the following places:
Philippines
maritime SoutheastAsia
Taiwan
Madagascar
PacificIslands
portions of NewZealand
Chile (Easter Island)
The main proof of the A. M. Theory is the linguisticsimilarities of Austronesian languages, i.e., shared vocabulary and patterns of repetition.
The A. M. T is also supported by cultural evidences such as staple food and domesticatedanimals.
The A. M. Theory is also supported by similar traditions like:
tattooing,
stilthouses,
jade,
riceterraces, and
a strong maritime orientation.
What are the two hypotheses that attempt to locate the origin of proto-Austronesians?
"Out of Taiwan" Hypothesis and Island Origin Hypothesis
The "Out of Taiwan" Hypothesis, proposed by PeterBellwood, states that the proto-Austronesians came from Southern China and sailed out due to overpopulation.
The Island Origin Hypothesis, proposed by WilhelmSolheim, proposes that the Austronesian homeland is the islands of Mindanao and Indonesia, spreading due to trading.
What is the most accepted theory in explaining the peopling of the Philippines?
Austronesian Migration Theory
Barangay - "balangay," Austronesian word for sea vessel
Baragay - sociopolitical organization that existed in precolonial Philippines
Barangay (Luzon, Vizayas) = Kampong (Mindanao)
Battasan - set of laws in a barangay
A barangay typically had 30-100 families.
Pangangayaw - slave raiding
The alliance building of barangays via marriages is through the binukot.