sets of plans or laws put in place by the government to address educational problems, e.g. underachievement
What was the 1944 Butler Education Act?
aimed to make secondary education more equal
established free secondary education for all pupils
The tripartite system
Grammar schools - highly academic focus for those passing the 11+ test
Secondary modern schools - practical based education for those failing the 11+ test
Technical schools - specialised practical schools
Was the tripartite system meritocratic?
reproduces class inequality as the middle class went to Grammar schools and earned the best jobs, whilst the working class ended up going to the secondary modern schools and getting manual jobs
girls had to get a higher mark to pass
stated that intelligence was innate, suggesting that the middle class passed due to being smart, rather than wealth and status
Evaluation of the tripartite system
difficult to measure intelligence as the 11+ only measured certain types
11 is too early to decide a child's future
students failing may have been labelled a failure and led to a self fulfilling prophecy
What are comprehensive schools
schools could not select pupils based on ability, scrapping the 11+ exam
Evaluation of the comprehensive system
many comprehensives streamed in ability groups, and middle class children were placed in higher streams than working class pupils
legitimised inequality through the myth of meritocracy, as all students went to the same school so it appeared they all had equal opportunities
What is marketisation
making something that is run by the government operate as if it was a business
e.g. making it subject to market forces of 'competition' and 'consumer choice'
When were marketisation policies first introduced?
By Thatcher in 1988 Education Reform Act
Marketisation policies (Conservative)
Open Enrolment - parents can send children to any school if they have the space
Formula Funding - each student is worth a set amount of money, meaning schools compete for students and standards increase
National Curriculum - government stipulated what was taught to ensure consistency in teaching
Exams - focuses efforts on achieving key targets
League Tables and OFSTED - compare performances and make schools accountable and drive up standards
Result/evaluation off marketisation policies
oversubscription of the best schools means students in the catchment area are more likely to get a place, legitimising class inequality as only middle class families tend to afford houses in the area
Gerwirtz conducted research and suggested that parentocracy only exists for the middle class and is not a possibility for the working class due to their lack of cultural and economic capital
What are equal opportunities policies?
more left wing policies put in place to reduce class inequalities within education
Namely by the New Labour government
Equal Opportunities Policies (New Labour)
Sure Start - free nursery education in deprived areas, since discontinued; however, woking parents are entitled 15-30 hours free childcare
Academies - new schools set up to replace failing comprehensives to ensure no children were educated in an ineffective school
Educational Maintenance Allowance - provided low-income families with £30 a week for educational equipment to reduce dropout rates
Excellence in Cities - extra resources to deprived city schools to improve results
Expansion of higher education
Free School Meals - reduce inequality
Evaluation of equal opportunities policies
Francis and Hutchings found academies did not improve standard for 2 / 3 of disadvantaged students
The middle classes still got into the best schools
Many contradictory policies that increase inequality, e.g. tuition fees
Increase standards Policies
Coalition
Pupil Premium - helps disadvantaged students achieve by encouraging better schools to take them and gives schools more funds to improve
Linear A Levels - drives up standards and allows competition in global market
New Labour
Value added - drives up standards by encouraging competition
Tuition fees - improves standards at university
Conservative
Formula Funding - have to increase standards to gain pupils, and funding
League tables and OFSTED - schools held accountable so drives up standards
What is privatisation
Where external private businesses deliver services to education
School services - e.g. ICT, branding, school meals = can involve international corporations e.g. Adobe
Examining bodies - compete for school's business by establishing the 'best' course, e.g Pearsons
School management - 86% schools had academised by 2021 meaning businesses make a profit and schools have flexibility
Buildings - private companies build and maintain schools they can rent to the government
Evaluation of privatisation
Companies have experience in running successful schools
Companies are unlikely to reinvest into schools if profit is the main aim
Variety of companies running schools increases parentocracy, increasing standards
Companies can fail
Companies may take on failing schools and increase standards
Ball said there may be a cola - isation of education, e.g influence pupils to purchase products (vending machines)
Cherry-pick schools
May influence curriculum, e.g. teach more science and maths as it is important in employment and will drive up international standards
How has globalisation affected educational policies?
marketisation and privatisation
international comparisons
Marketisation/Privatisation and globalisation
Hancock = UK economy made £ 18 billion in 2012 by exporting education services and products to countries like China
Policies have allowed businesses to make more money from expanding the global education market - school management, school services, formula funding (schools must increase standards to attract = better in international comparisons), etc.
What is Mcdonaldisation?
used by Ritzer
culture adopts the characteristics of a fast food restaurant
Mcdonaldization attempts to reduce education to a product that can be packaged, marketed and sold
For example:
Efficiency - pupils part of assembly line, treated the same
Predictability - expected to display same skills at same time, curriculum is same for all
Calculability - constant testing to ensure 'product' is good enough
Control - schools are run by fear
International Comparisons
3 main sources of statistics comparing students' abilities with other countries
PISA - student assessment
TIMSS - maths and science
PIRLS - literacy
How are international comparisons ranking used:
see if existing policies work
see what areas need to be improved when creating policies
'cherry - pick' policies from best performing countries, e.g. Michael Gove's proposal to extend the school day to mirror longer hours in East Asian countries like South Korea and Singapore
Policies created due to international comparisons
National Literacy and Numeracy - daily hour of maths and English to improve rankings on international league tables
Slimming down the curriculum - removal of subjects so it is in line with core content offered in other countries that perform better in PISA rankings
Tougher entry requirements for teachers - trainees had to pass much harder teats in English, maths, ICT - based on a Finnish policy who out-performed the UK for years
Master Teachers - proposed by Labour, based on a policy in Singapore who have regularly been in top 5 in PISA
Evaluation of international comparisons
cultured from which policies are 'cherry - picked' differ greatly from British culture, ad what works for one, may not work for another, e.f. South Korea has high PISA rating but high suicide rate amongst school-aged children due to academic pressure
Alexander states it leads to a "PISA panic" over the state of British education and searches for 'miracle cures'
PREVENT - globalisation on education
schools teach the fundamental British values - respect and tolerance, democracy, rule of law and individual liberty - to reduce radicalisation
Reinforces key values in society
Helps prevent radicalisation and the promotion of extremist views that has occurred in the era of globalisation
Functionalist perspective on education
Durkheim
Parsons
Davis and Moore
Durkheim
Social Solidarity - societies need to feel a sense of unity otherwise co-operation will be impossible and society will be in anarchy. Schools transmit the value consensus giving people a sense of social identity, creating social solidarity
Specialist skills - successful economies need different specialists with skills and knowledge to do different jobs. Education teaches specialist skills that parents cannot. Without a skilled labour force, the economy would struggle, demonstrating the interdependent nature of education and the economy.
Evaluation of Durkheim
Social solidarity - Marxists say only the values of the ruling class are transmitted
Specialist skills - often what people learn in schools has little direct relation to the jobs they do. Marxists say schools prepare working class for mundane, low paid jobs (B owes and Gintis)
Parsons
education is a bridge between the family and real life
family is based on particularistic values and ascribed status
Education and real world is based on universalistic values and achieved status
School and society are a meritocracy, and thus pupils are socialised into a meritocracy before they join the 'real world'
Evaluation of Parsons
Society isn't truly based on universalistic values, as most elite jobs are influenced by ascribed status, and wealth is inherited
80 % of jobs are earned through nepotism
Davis and Moore
'sifting and sorting' workers into the right jobs
The smartest and talented need the best and most important jobs, and the least capable need less important jobs.
this is based on academic achievement in school
Financial inequality is necessary to attract people to the difficult jibs - a by- product of a meritocracy
Everyone has equality of opportunity for best jobs and salary
Evaluation of Davis and Moore
meritocracy is a myth
The best jobs are taken by rich, white men
New Right perspective of education
state control has resulted in inefficiency, a weak economy, and lack of personal responsibility.
culture of dependency has developed where people heavily rely on the government to solve their problems.
the answer to a failing education system is creating an ‘education market' - Marketisation
Chubb and Moe (New Right)
conducted research on around 1000 state and private schools in the US
students from poorer backgrounds do 5 % better in private schools than in state schools.
The control of schools would be put in the hands of parents, allowing them to shape the school to meet their local needs - parentocracy
Chubb and Moe also believe that rising standards are essential as a result of globalisation.
Evaluation of New Right
Gewirtz says parentocracy only benefits middle class parents
real cause of low educational standards is social inequality
Marxist perspective on education
Althusser
Bordieu
Bowles and Gintis
Althusser
Ruling class uses 'the state' to control the working class: ISA - controls ideas or beliefs through socialisation techniques - and RSA - controls bodies through force.
Education is main ISA in western society
creates an efficient and obedient work force by giving them the necessary practical skills and socialising pupils into the dominant ideology
students prepare for a life of exploitative work and learn capitalism is fair
Evaluation of Althusser
cannot explain how many working class individuals are in higher education and have high paid jobs
suggests that ISA is not as powerful, if it even exists, in contemporary society
Bordieu
ruling class impose their culture on the education system, so what counts as 'knowledge' comes from the culture of the dominant class
middle and upper class have access to this culture and have a built-in advantage due to their cultural capital
this reproduces class inequality as the working class have less cultural capital
it legitimises class inequality as the dominant ideology says that school is meritocratic
Evaluation of Bordieu
how/why do so many working class individuals get to be successful in education