Potential parallel input - multiple words often visible = potential processing several words at once
Orthography - visual representation
Clear lexical segmentation
Learned ability - Becomes automatic
Auditory word recognition
Serial input - sequentially, 1 at a time
phonetics/ phonology - sounds & how sounds organized
No clear segmentation cues
Unaided acquisition - naturally through exposure
Character recognition - template matching
storing templates or patterns of characters in brain of every possible input will look like
match observed objects to proper image in memory
storage concerns - all possible representations of letters?
normalisation to letter prototypes - cleaning up images, dealing with occlusion & noise
Character recognition - feature detection
Analysis by synthesis
character broken down to constituent parts
list of parts compared to patterns in memory
best matching pattern chosen
Word superiority effect (Reicher 1969)
letters recognized more accurately & rapidly when presented in meaningful context = Lexical context = evidence of top-down control of character recognition
bias towards 'well formed' stimuli - misidentify words with uncommon spelling & non-words as neighbouring words
Interactive activation model - McClelland & Rumelhart 1981
Interactive activation model - McClelland & Rumelhart 1981 - Similar to TRACE
incorporates (visual) features
(positional) characters - lateral inhibition (activation of 1 unit inhibits activation of neighboring), excitatory & inhibitory connections between units
word detectors - lateral inhibition
Routes to visual word recognition - role of phonology -
Assembled route hypothesis
Visual analysis of characters
= Activation of phoneme corresponding to character
activation = helps remaining lexical access as Spoken Word Recognition - phonological information helps brain recognize & understand word by linking visual input to spoken form
Routes to visual word recognition - orthography
system of writing in a language - rules, conventions for spelling, punctuation, grammar
varies across languages & writing systems
Routes to visual word recognition - shallow orthography
more consistent & predictable spelling rules
1 relationship between letters & phonemes
= direct & consistent relationship between letters used in writing & phonemes they represent in speech
Each letter typically corresponds to 1 specificsound = easier to predict pronunciation based on spelling
Spanish, Finnish
Routes to visual word recognition - deep orthography
more complex & variable spelling patterns
Same letter often used to signify different sounds in different contexts
Some advantage: morphologically related but different sounding words spelled similarly
= related in meaning but different sounds may be spelt similarly
= reflects morphological connections between words