Cultural Variations in Attachment, including Van ljzendoorn

Cards (15)

  • Ethnocentric
    Only using a US sample
  • Strange Situation replicated across other countries

    Data examined to see how much of Ainsworth's work could be applied to other countries and cultures
  • Van Ijzendoorn

    Dutch psychologist who conducted the largest and most famous study
  • Meta-analysis

    Combining data/findings from several other researchers to come to conclusions
  • Advantages of meta-analysis

    • Avoided time and costs associated with travel as well as cultural and language barriers
  • Countries included in the meta-analysis

    • Great Britain
    • Germany
    • Netherlands
    • Sweden
    • Japan
    • Israel
    • United States
    • China
  • Secure attachment (B) is the most commonly found attachment type in all countries studied
  • Insecure Avoidant (A) is the second most common attachment type in Western/industrialised/individualistic societies
  • Insecure Resistant (C) is the second most common attachment type in non-Western/non-industrialised/collectivist societies
  • There is more difference within a culture than between cultures
  • If the sound were turned down on the strange situation tapes and there were no clues as to the culture/country they were filmed in

    You would not be able to tell what the country was just by looking at the videos of the infants
  • If you watched a day of strange situation films from say, Sweden
    You would see all three attachment types and so there would be variety
  • There is more diversity inside the cultures than between them
  • Strengths of the meta-analysis
    • Quicker and cheaper than alternatives
    • Allowed researchers to obtain data from countries where language and cultural barriers may have been an issue
    • The study is reliable as it can easily be replicated
    • The large sample from a variety of places makes it representative and generalisable
  • Limitations of the meta-analysis

    • Hard to check the validity of some of the studies as the researchers have no way of knowing if the data was collected in a scientific manner
    • A lot of countries and continents are missing including Africa and much of Asia
    • Imbalance of studies used, with so many for the US that those results are also the mean for the whole study
    • The Chinese study only had 25 infants, so a tiny sample representing around 20% of the global population
    • Takahashi found that Japanese infants were often seen as Type C as they were rarely left by their PCG and so the strange situation was terrifying for them, raising the question of whether the strange situation is valid elsewhere