Interviewed 60Chicago high school teachers who judged pupils according to how closely they fit the image of an idealpupil, with middle-class students seen as closest to the ideal and working-class students farthest away
In a working-class primary school, the ideal pupil was defined as quiet, passive, and obedient, while in a middle-class primary school, the ideal pupil was defined in terms of personality and academic ability rather than behaviour
Teachers normalise the underachievement of working-class students but believe they canovercome the underachievement of middle-class students, due to assumptions about parental interest in education
Teachers underestimate the potential of working-class students and enter them for easy exams, while providing extensions for underachieving middle-class students
The teacher used information about children's home background and appearance to place them in separate groups, with the "tigers" (middle-class) seatedclosestto the front and given more opportunities, while the "cardinals" and "clowns" (working-class) were seated further away and given lower-level books
Marxists argue that labels are not mainly the result of teachers' individual prejudice, but they stem from the fact that teachers work in a system that reproduces class division
Marxists argue that labels are not mainly the result of teachers' individual prejudice, but they stem from the fact that teachers work in a system that reproduces class division