Teachers often attach labels to students based on stereotypes and assumptions of their class background, rather than their actualability or attitude
Labelling of students
Working class students are labelled negatively, while middle-class students are labelled positively
Becker's study
Interviewed 60Chicago high school teachers who judged pupils according to how closely they fit the image of an idealpupil, with middle-class students seen as closest to the ideal and working-class students farthest away
Hempel-Jorgensen's study
In a working-class primary school, the ideal pupil was defined as quiet, passive, and obedient, while in a middle-class primary school, the ideal pupil was defined in terms of personality and academic ability rather than behaviour
Labelling and secondary schools
Teachers normalise the underachievement of working-class students but believe they canovercome the underachievement of middle-class students, due to assumptions about parental interest in education
Labelling and secondary schools
Teachers underestimate the potential of working-class students and enter them for easy exams, while providing extensions for underachieving middle-class students
Rist's study of an American kindergarten
The teacher used information about children's home background and appearance to place them in separate groups, with the "tigers" (middle-class) seatedclosestto the front and given more opportunities, while the "cardinals" and "clowns" (working-class) were seated further away and given lower-level books
The labelling theory can be accused of
Determinism
The labelling theory assumes that people who are labelled have no choice, but to fulfil the prophecy and will inevitably fail
Fullers study shows that the above assumption is not always true
Marxists are also criticising the labelling theory for
Ignoring the wider structures of power within which labelling takes place
Labelling theory tends to blame teachers for labelling people and will explain why they do so
Marxists argue that labels are not mainly the result of teachers' individual prejudice, but they stem from the fact that teachers work in a system that reproduces class division
The labelling theory assumes that people who are labelled have no choice, but to fulfil the prophecy and will inevitably fail
Fullers study shows that this is not always true
Marxists are also criticising the labelling theory for
Ignoring the wider structures of power within which labelling takes place
Labelling theory tends to blame teachers for labelling people and will explain why they do so
Marxists argue that labels are not mainly the result of teachers' individual prejudice, but they stem from the fact that teachers work in a system that reproduces class division