Disagreement, discord, friction that occur when actions or beliefs of one or more members of the group is unacceptable to or resisted by one or more of the other group members
Types of conflict
Intragroupconflict – confrontation between members of the same group
Intergroupconflict – disagreement between two or more groups and their member that can include physical violence, interpersonal discord and psychological tension
Winning: Conflict & competition
Interdependent – one influence another through individual and coordinated action
Cooperation – positive experience; success of any one from the group improve the chances of other members succeeding
Competition – success depends on performing better than others
Mixed-motive situations – performance setting in which interdependence among interactants involves both competitive and cooperative goal structures
Behavioral assimilation
Theeventualmatchingofbehaviors displayed (cooperative and/or competitors) by group member
Normofreciprocity – sustains mutuality in exchange
Positivereciprocity
Negativereciprocity – tends to be stronger than positive reciprocity
e.g. A cooperative person who runs into a competitive partner is more likely to begin to compete before the competitive person begins to cooperate, so as a result a partner turns into an opponent faster than an opponent turns into ally
Socialvaluesorientation
The dispositional tendency to respond to conflict settings in a proself or prosocial way
SVO4distinctorientations
Individualists – are proself and concerned only with their own outcomes; their actions may indirectly impact other group members BUT such influence is NOT their goal
Competitors – are proself and strive to maximize their own outcomes but they also minimize others' outcomes; they view disagreement as win-lose situation and find satisfaction in forcing their ideas on others
Cooperators – both prosocial and proself – win-win solution; they value interpersonal strategies; they strive to maximize their own outcomes and others as well
Altruists – prosocial but not proself; they sacrifice their own outcomes in helping others to achieve some gain
Social Dilemma
Interpersonal situation where individuals must choose between maximizing their personal outcomes or maximizing their group outcomes
CommonsDilemma (socialtrap)
Members may be tempted to take as much as possible of the resources but if they take too much the resources will be destroyed (take some)
PublicGoodsDilemma
Members are asked to contribute to the group BUT members often don't fulfill this obligation (give some dilemma)
Free riding
Avoiding work
Social loafing
Avoiding work
Remedies for free riding and social loafing
Remind those who contribute too little of their obligations and extract promises of improved performance
Publicly reward those who do their share
Impose costs on the free riders – e.g. Criticism and/or fines
Procedural justice
Based on the methods used to make decisions about the allocation of resources
Distributive justice
Concerns how rewards and costs are shared by (distributed across) the group members. Depends on the norms the group uses to allocate rewards
4 distributive norms
Equity – the group gives more to members who have done more for the group
Equality – the group treats all members equally no matter what their contribution to the group
Power – the group allocates more of its resources to those with more authority, status or control over the group and less to those in lower-level position
Need – the group takes into consideration the level of the need of each of its members and allocates more of its resources to those with the greatest needs and less to those who need less irrespective of how much these individuals contributed to the group (social responsibility norm)
ResponsibilityDilemma
When group completes its work, members often dispute who deserves credit and who deserves blame
Egocentrism
Self-serving bias in which giving oneself more responsibility for an outcome or event than is warranted
Sociocentric
Group serving
Taskconflict
Content conflict or substantive conflict. Disagreement about issues that are relevant to the groups' recognized goals and objectives
Process conflict
Procedural conflict. Disagreement over the methods the group should use to complete its basic tasks
Relationshipconflict
Interpersonal discord that occurs when group members dislike one another
Blaming
People usually dislike others who evaluate them negatively, so criticism- even when deserved – can generate conflict
Agreeablepersonalities
People who have agreeable personalities are usually better liked by others because they exert calming influence on their groups
BalanceTheory
Predicted that conflicts between friends would elevate levels of tension but conflicts with enemies would generate more open hostility
Confirmation bias
People rationalize their choices once they have made them: They seek out information that supports their views, they reject information that conflicts with their stance
Fundamentalattributionerror
Assume that conflict/problem was caused by personal (dispositional) rather than situational (environmental) factors
Soft tactics
When members express their ideas as questions soften their claims e.g. "What do you think? Do you see what I mean? And explicitly underscore their uncertainty, disagreements are less likely to turn into conflicts
Hard tactics
Harsh, coercive and unilateral influence tactics often trigger reactance, negative emotions and the use of hard tactics of influence return e.g. Promise, reward, threaten, punish, bully, discuss, instruct, negotiate etc.
The capacity to threaten others intensifies conflict
Rational
(in classical economic theory) economic agents are able to consider the outcome of their choices and recognise the net benefits of each one
Producers act rationally by
Selling goods/services in a way that maximises their profits
Workers act rationally by
Balancing welfare at work with consideration of both pay and benefits
Governments act rationally by
Placing the interests of the people they serve first in order to maximise their welfare
Rationality in classical economic theory is a flawed assumption as people usually don't act rationally
Personalfactors
Strengths, attitude, values and other personal qualities
Situational factors
Environmental factors
Misperceiving motivations - when conflict occurs, members begin to wonder about one another's motivations; members often become distrustful
The loss of trust is one of the primary reason why people when they begin to compete with one another, have difficulty returning to a cooperative relationship