Why do governments want to prevent monopoly power?
There is the potential for market failure, and loss of consumersurplus, that can result from a monopolyexploiting the market.
What are the main ways monopolies can be prevented?
Price regulation
Profit Regulation
Quality Standards
Performance Targets
What does Price Regulation involve?
Monopolies aim to produce at the profit maximisation level of output, (MC=MR).
So governments can implement price capping
What does a price cap do?
It limits the price. (Such as a maximumprice).
What are the different type of price caps that governments can use?
RPI-X
RPI +/- K
Based on RPI.
What does Based on RPI do?
This price cap allows firms to onlyincrease their prices by the level of RPIinflation.
For instance:
If RPI was 2%, the firm would be able to increase their prices by 2%, helping to cover inflationaryincreases in the firm’s costs. Therefore, although a price rise may take place, in real terms, prices are unchanged.
What does X mean in RPI-X?
it represent a certain percentage.
Why does the government want to use RPI-X?
if the government want to restrict price increases by a lower percentage than that of the retail price index.
What does RPI-X do?
Encourages firms to increase their efficiency by restrictingpriceincrease by a lowerpercentage than that of the RPI.
By doing so the firm will still make a substantialprofit (given that they cut their costs by more than the value of X) despite only being able to increase their prices by a percentagebelow the rate of RPI.
What does RPI+/- K mean?
K is equal to a percentage that allows the firm to make a large enoughprofit for capital investment.
As this is dependent on the profit made at the firm’s currentprice level, the value K can either be negative or positive
Where is RPI+/-K seen the most?
the water industry
What are the advantages of RPI-X Regulation?
The regulator can set price increasesdepending on the state of the industry and potential efficiencysavings.
If a firm cut costs by more than X, they can increase their profits.Arguably there is an incentive to cut costs.
Surrogatecompetition. In the absence of competition, RPI-X is a way to increasecompetition and prevent the abuse of monopoly power.
What are the disadvantage of RPI-X Regulation
It is costly and difficult to decide what the level of X should be.
There is a danger of regulatory capture, where regulators become too soft on the firm and allow them to increase prices and make supernormal profits.
However, firms may argue regulators are too strict and don’tallow them to make enoughprofit for investment.
If a firm becomes very efficient, it may be penalised by having higher levels of X, so it can’t keep its efficiencysaving.
Desired effect of price regulation on diagram
The desired effect of price regulation can be seen on the diagram above.
This shows the maximumprice level at the point of allocativeefficiency.
Through priceregulation the government is able to forcemonopolies to produce at a point at which consumersatisfaction in maximised.
The effect of this can be seen through a lower price (PM to PQ) and an increase in the quantity of goods/services produced (QM to QC).
A) MC
B) AC
C) Maximum Price
D) D=AR
E) MR
What does profit regulation involve?
Governments can control the profits that firms earn by ensuring they are not excessive.
Eg. via Corporatetax
Is corporate tax direct or indirect?
Direct tax
What are examples of profit regulation used?
Rate of returnregulation
Profit Capping
What is rate of return regulation?
A form of profit regulation.
This occurs when the government look at the profit that is made by a firm and then decide the reasonablelevel of profit that they shouldearn given the rate of return on capitalemployed
What does the rate of return regulation do?
Encourages firms to increase their capitalemployed.
If a firm is making profits that are notproportionate to the size of the firm or capital employed, then the government are likely to regulate the firm and reduces the profit they make through means such as taxation.
What are the downsides of Profit regulation?
Costs are difficult for the CMA to calculate
Firms often try to inflate their perceivedcosts so as to make moreprofit than allowed
Monopolies have noincentive to lowercosts, so if costs are higher than they would be in perfectcompetitionconsumers still end up paying higherprices
Even with this policy in place, natural monopolies seem to post record profits year on year
What does quality standards involve?
The government often intervenes through legislative means to ensure that firms meet a minimumstandard.
E.g.
gas and electric companies are not allowed to cut off the gas/electricity supply for pensioners in the winter months despite not paying their gas/electricity bill.
Why should quality standards be used?
One way firms can maximiseprofit is to reduce the quality of the rawmaterials to decreasecosts. Which reduces the quality of the end good/service. If there are no substitutes then this is a likely outcome
What does performance targets involve?
Performance targets can be implemented in order to ensure that firms are operating in the consumer’sinterest and that competitive outcomes are achieved.
Examples of performance targets:
in the rail industry, performance targets are often set whereby a train company is only allowed to have a certain number of delays on a daily basis. Going past this figure may result in fines being issued.
The NHS, which has monopoly power, also has performance targets, such as reducing waiting times. It helps the firm to focus on increasing social welfare.
Price Capping in marktes
A maximumprice involves a normative judgement on behalf of the government/authorities about what that price should be - designed to curb monopolyprofit.
In diagram below; At a cappedprice, the monopolist can make a profit but supernormalprofit will be lower.
A) Capped Price
B) Supernormal profit
C) MR
D) AR
E) AC
F) MC
Chains of Reasoning for capping the price of a monopoly:
To be effective, the cappedprice must be set by the regulatorbelow the normal profit maximisingprice.
A price cap lowers the monopoly (supernormal) profit made by dominant firms in the market.
This may stimulate attempts to improvecostefficiency.
In theory - it leads to an improvement in allocativeefficiency and consumerwelfare.
It may also lead to the exit of some businesses from the industry which might actually reducecompetition.
Arguments for price capping with a monopoly
Capping is an appropriate way to curtail the monopoly power of naturalmonopolies or dominant firms preventing them from making excessive profits at the expense of consumers
Cuts in the real price levels are good for household and industrialconsumers (increase in consumer surplus and higherreal living standards in the long run)
Price capping helps to stimulate improvements in productiveefficiency because lower costs are needed to increase a producer'sprofits
The pricecapping system can be a tool for controlling consumerpriceinflation
Arguments against price capping
Price caps have led to large numbers of job losses especially in the utility industries
Setting different price capping regimes for each industry distorts the working of the price mechanism
The industry regulator may not have enoughaccurate information when setting the price caps for future years
Capping prices means lower profits which in turn can lead to reducedcapitalinvestment by the utility businesses - ultimately consumerssuffer if there is under-investment in utilityinfrastructure such as water and energy
Profit capping methods
Cost-PlusPricing
Combination of revenue-capping and cost-monitoring
Cost-Plus Pricing method of profit capping
this approach requires competition authorities to assess the productioncosts of firms, and then allow a certainprice to be charged above that, thus limitingprofits.
The mainadvantage is that this is simple to understand for both regulator and firm. However, it does not give the monopoly firm any incentive to try and reduceproductioncosts and become moreefficient. There is also the risk of not enough profit being earned to provide finance for innovation or investment.
Combination of revenue-capping and cost-monitoring method of profit capping:
Easier for competition authorities to manage and regulate than profit-capping directly. Revenue-capping is arguably very similar to price- capping, as regulators may want a firm to only earn a certain amount of revenue per itemsold / per customer.
Issue with price-capping
True profit-capping is not, as yet, a policy that is followed by any majorcompetitionauthorities, probably because of the issues that are likely to arise as a result. These might include:
Disincentivisation of businessactivity
Reduction in corporationtaxrevenue
Ease with which firms could bypass the regulation e.g. setting up subsidiaries, or offshoring etc