Ijzendoorn and Krooneberg - looked at proportions of secure, insecure-avoidant and insecure-resistant attachments to assess cultural variation.
Ijendoorn and Kroonenberg - procedure
meta-analysed32 studies of attachment with strange situation
8 countries - 15 in US
1,990 children
Ijzendoorn and kroonenberg: findings -
secure attachment most common classification. 75% in Britain. 50% in China.
individualist culture - insecure-resitant rates similar to Ainsworths original sample. - 15%
collectivist culture (China,Japan, Israel) - insecure-resistant rates were above25%
variation between results within the same country were greater than those between countries.
Italian study - Simonelli
assessed 76 babies aged 12 months using strange situation
50% - secure (lower rate )
36% - insecure-avoidant (higher rate)
increasing numbers of mothers of very young children work long hours and use professional childcare
Korean study - Jin
87 babies assessed with strange situation
proportions of insecure and secure babies similar in most countries - most babies secure
only one baby insecure avoidant
similar to ijzendoorn and kroonenberg Japan study
similar child-rearing styles
AO3 cultural variations- conducted by indigenous psychologists
Same cultural background as the participants. Problems in cross-cultural research can be avoided - misunderstandings of language used, difficulty communicating or bias from stereotypes.
enhances validity
AO3 cultural variations- confounding variables
Sample characteristics such as poverty, age, social class and urban makeup confound results. Environmental variables may differ between studies: sizeofroom (less visible proximity-seeking), toys available (make babies explore more).
AO3 cultural variations - imposed etic
Assumes an idea or technique that works in one cultural context will work in another. E.G: in Strange situation the babies' response to reunion. Britain + US -lack affection on reunion indicates avoidant attachment. In Germany this would be interpreted as independence