Wundt - 'father of psychology' - developed the first psychology lab, became interested in the mind and mental processes
Prior psychology was once called -'experimentalphilosophy'
Introspection - 'lookinginto' process which a person examines their own thoughts and feelings
Wundt Method - reporting thought processes out loud in response to a stimulus (e.g. metronome)
Wundt evaluation - STRENGTHS
Controlled environment
Used standardised instructions
Provided a foundation for psychology as a science
Wundt evaluation - WEAKNESSES
Low ecological validity (used and artificial task)
Social desirability
Subjective in the interpretation of the thoughts
Emergence of psychology as a science - Wundt provided scientificfoundations to psychology by applying objective, systematic and replicable approach to introspection
Watson - argued that psychology should look at behaviour as it is possible to observeobjectively and scientifically
Behaviourism - dominantparadigm, but overlook the mind and this led to the cognitive approach (paradigmshift)
Falsifiable = the possibility that something can be considered false by observation or experiment
Objective = based on facts rather than opinions
Replicable = makes it reliable (standardised procedure)
Systematic = standardisation
Behaviourist approach assumptions
psychologists should only study observable, quantifiable behaviour
Behaviourist approach assumptions
psychologists should only study observable, quantifiable behaviour
all behaviour is learnt
humans are no different from animals
research on animals behaviour is directly relevant to humans
Pavlov - classicalconditioning with dogs, food and bell, dogs learnt to associate a bell (neutralstimulus) with with (unconditionedstimulus) resulting in the dogs salivating (conditionedresponse)
Skinner - operant conditioning
positive = when a behaviour is followed by a desirable consequence (reward)
negative = when a behaviour is followed by the removal of adverse consequence
punishment = when a behaviour is followed by an unpleasant consequence
Evaluation Behaviourist approach: STRENGTH 1
encouraged research that focused on more objective dimensions of behaviour
contributed to the recognition of psychology as a science
helped psychology gain credibility and status as a scientific discipline
evaluation behaviourist approach: STRENGTH 2
influential in encouraging the use of animals as researchsubjects - gives experimenters control without demand characteristic or individualdifferences
evaluation behaviourist approach: WEAKNESSES 1
animal experiments = unethical as there is less concern for protection from harm
not generalisable to human behaviour
evaluation behaviourist approach: WEAKNESS 2
limited view of the origins of behaviour - role of cognition and emotional factors that influence behaviour
Social learning theory assumptions
learning occurs through observation and imitation
behaviour is performed through rolemodels
recognises the importance of meditationalprocesses
Identification (SLT) - associating with the qualities, characteristics and views of role models, to become more like that person.
KEY STUDY (SLT) - Bandura Method: 72 children aged between 3-6 years were put into one of three conditions
aggressive model = child played in a room while an adult hit and shouted at a 'bobo doll'
non-aggressive model = child played while an adult played quietly with a construction set
control group = child did not see a model
Bandura results: children who saw the aggressive model produced more aggressive behaviour than those who saw the non-aggressive model. Boys imitated more same-sex models.
evaluation SLT: STRENGTH 1
application to real-life issues - used to examine and evaluate the effectiveness of advertising
research found identification with a character or example may increase the likelihood that audiences will model that behaviour'
evaluation Bandura: WEAKNESSES 1
criticised in the method used - lab study (artificial environment)
possibility of demand characteristics (lowersinternal validity)
cognitive approach assumptions:
focuses on the examinations of internal mental processes
makes use of theoretical models and computer models
inferences
internalmentalprocess = operations that occur during thinking. cannot be directly observed so psychologists use inferences
schema: mental frameworks of information that we use to organisepast experiences and to interpret new situations
theoretical models: usually diagrams or flowchart (e.g. multi-store model)
computer models: LTM being the harddisk and STM being viewed as the RAM. Useful in the development of AI
Emergence of cognitive neuroscience: bridge the gap between the cognitive approach and biological approach
PET scans
MRI's
Hippocampus: associated with episodicmemory
temporal lobe = associated with semanticmemory
cerebellum and motor cortex = associated with proceduralmemory
evaluation cognitive approach: STRENGTHS
recognition of the complexity of human behaviour
many real-world applications - memory and the effect of misleading questions (cognitive interview)
helped professional understand and treat mental-health issues (CBT)
evaluation cognitive approach: STRENGTH 2
neuroimaging techniques provide empirical evidence of brain activity for specific cognitive functions
strongscientific grounding
HOWEVER - only correlational
evaluation cognitive approach: WEAKNESSES
not all human behaviour can be captured under the cognitiveumbrella
tends to neglect of dimensions which may be linked to cognition (emotion and motivation)
overlooks the equally important fact that we are not just cognitive creatures
biological approach assumption: necessary to understand biologicalstructures (genes and neurochemistry)