Trainedfacilitators work with both to talk about what happened, who was affected and how and what can be done to repair the harm.
It can takeplace at any stage of the criminal justice process.
The process of restorative justice?
The victim and offendermeetoutside the courtroom with a trainedspecialist.
They discuss the event and focus on the offender taking responsibility and victimforgiving them for closure.
This could be achieved by the victim saying how they were affected.
The offenderthensees the impact their crime had, and may choose to sharemotives or an apology.
Victim will hopefullyachieveclosure and the offender can make first steps towardsrehabilitation.
Why is it effective?
There is evidence of it being effective.
Sherman and Strang (2007) metaanalysisof36 studies and foundreduction in reoffending, especially for propertycrimes.
Why is it ineffective?
Requiresoffender to actuallyengage in the process and feel remorse. They may not be able to feelthis (e.gmay be an affection less pyschopath) or maypretend in order to escapeotherpunishment.
It is not suitable for all crimes - for example, domesticviolence may traumatise victims to be face to face with aggressor.
How does it reduce crime/ link to functionalism?
Links to boundarymaintenance: it allows the victim to condemn the wrongdoersactions and reinforce society’s commitment to sharednorms and values.
If effective, it shouldbring the offenderback in line with societies shared norms and values.