characteristic patterns of thoughts, feeling & behaviours that make a person unique. arises from within the individual and remains fairly consistent throughout life.
factors of authoritarian personality:
submissive to authority- blindly follow hierarchy (obedience to those in higher authority).
belief in aggression towards those who don't subscribe to conventional thinking, or who are diff.
prejudices shown towards those who are diff.
a need for strong leadership which displays uncomprimising power.
result of rigid & strict parenting (often) w/use of physical punishment.
growing up in this environment makes it the norm- they pick up authoritarian personality through learning and imitation.
evaluating the F-scale:
no cause and effect between parenting & authoritarian personality.
some prejudiced people don't conform to an authoritarian personality.
only focused on one dimension of personality.
what is the F-scale?
the F Scale, or Fascism Scale, is a psychological instrument developed by Theodor W. Adorno and his colleagues in the 1940s to measure the authoritarian personality.
consists of a series of statements on which respondents rate their degree of agreement, w/higher scores indicating a stronger tendency toward authoritarianism and prejudice.
alternative measures:
altmeyer (1981)- composed the right-wing authoritarianism (RWA).
focused on 3 dimensions:
conventionalism- norms & values
authoritarian aggression- aggressive feelings towards those who don't follow norms.
authoritarian submission- passive obedience to legitimate authorities.
when and why was the authoritarian personality 1st proposed?
propose by fromm (1941) as an attempt to explain those holding right-wing, conservative views.
personality type characterised by a belief in absolute obedience, submission to authority & domination of minorities; 'might is right'.
research into authoritarian personality & obedience:
zillmer et al (1995)- reported that 16 nazi war criminals scored highly on 3 of the f-scale dimensions, but not all 9 (was expected), giving only limited support for the concept.
elms & milgram (1966)- found that p's who were highly obedient, were sig. more authoritarian on the f-scale than disobedient p's, supporting idea of link between authoritarian personality type and obedience.
further support: altemeyer (1988)- reported that p's w/an authoritarian personality type who were ordered to give the shocks, gave higher shocks than those w/out the personality type.
evaluation of research:
although f-scale has some research support, supposedly authoritarian individuals don't always score highly on all the dimensions as the theory would predict.
f-scale suffers from response bias, scale is worked in a confirming direction. therefore if individuals agree w/items they are rated as authoritarian. altemeye (1981)- produced the less biased right wing authoritarian scale (RWA), which has an equal no. of pro- & anti-statements.
theory politically biased, as individuals w/an authoritarian personality are seen as only existing on the conservative right-wing of political viewpoints.
the internal explanation:
dispositional explanation is an internal explanation, as the focus is on the idea that certain personality characteristics are associated w/higher levels of obedience.
adorno et al. (1950)- internal explanation:
saw people of this type having insecurities that lead to hostile to non-conventional people and having a belief in a need for power & toughness, which leads them to be highly obedient to authority figures.
adorno additonally saw the personality type as being shaped in early childhood by hierarchical, authoritarian parenting.
to measure an individual's degree of authoritarian personality, adorno constructed?
the f-scale questionnaire which has 30 q's assessing 9 personality dimensions (the 'f' stands for fascist).
more recently, what did joss et al. (2003) offer?
a more cognitive explanation by claiming that the authoritarian personality is motivated by thought processes which underpin a desire to reduce the fears & anxieties that social change brings.
strict obedience to authority is seen as helping to prevent disruptive social change.