Coalition

Cards (14)

  • Michael Gove
    • Heavily criticised the 'educational establishment' which he describes as 'the blob'.
    • Said education had failed to enforce rigorous standards and had made qualifications too easy.
    • Easy qualifications led to the declining standards of the workforce
  • Coalition government
    • Took marketisation even further by creating academies and free schools.
    • Wanted to encourage 'excellence, competition and innovation' and introduce privatisation further.
  • Academies
    • All schools were encouraged to become academies, not just the failing ones.
    • The government would force schools that ere not satisfactory to become an academy and the ones deemed as 'outstanding' by Ofsted were invited to be one.
    • Academies could opt out of local authority control and receive all their funding from the government.
    • They took control of their curriculum and could manage their own admissions and appeals.
  • Evaluation of academies
    • The growth of academies created opportunities for more privatisation with some academies operating in chains run by businesses while being funded by the state.
    • Removes new labours focus on inequality by allowing any school to become an academy.
    • Increased fragmentation
    • Limited parental choice
  • Free schools
    • The aim of free schools was to create choice when the existing provision was poor.
    • Free schools could be set up by 'founding groups' which were religious groups, parent groups and teacher groups.
    • They had a good amount of control over their ethos and curriculum.
    • Managed their own admissions and appeals
  • Evaluation of free schools
    • Parental choice was limited in many areas as it continued to be difficult for children from disadvantaged backgrounds to get into their choice of school.
    • Swedish research suggests that free schools lower standards.
    • They are socially divisive.
    • Increased fragmentation.
  • Haralambos and Holborn
    • Reported that the national union of teachers argued that free schools and academies had led to a reduction in budget available to other schools.
    • Widened inequality.
  • Changes to the national curriculum
    • The national curriculum was made more traditional.
    • There was a focus on teaching grammar and fractions for 5 year olds.
    • Michael Gove set out a 'knowledge-based curriculum' rather than a focus on transferrable skills.
    • A levels were 'toughened up' with fewer resists allowed and vocational qualifications were downgraded
    • The EBACC was introduced. This took into account pupils performance in traditional academic subjects and narrowed the curriculum as schools focussed heavily on these subjects.
  • The effects of the coalitions austerity programme
    • Spending on education fell in the UK by almost 15% between 2010-11 and 2014-15 to pay off the country's debt.
    • Sure start provision was drastically reduced which reduced the opportunities for working class pupils.
    • Students fees were raised from £3000 to a maximum of £9000 which discouraged students from less affluent backgrounds.
  • Socially democratic influenced policies
    • Pupil premium
    • FSM
    • Funding for low-income high education students
  • Pupil premium
    • Aimed at providing extra resources for schools related to the number of pupils and students who were on low income.
    • Headteachers were given the choice on how to spend this money. They had to demonstrate its effectiveness in increasing educational opportunity for disadvantaged students.
  • Evaluation of pupil premium
    • Ofsted found that in many cases pupil premium is not spent on who it should be.
    • Only 1 in 10 headteachers said it has specifically changed how they supported students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
    • Ratcliffe found that 53% of teachers said that pupil premium money was not being used to plug the gap left by decreased funding in education.
  • Funding for low-income high education students
    • Children from lower income families could get maintenance grants to cover the cost of living while at universities.
    • Larger loans were available for those from low income families who wouldn't be receiving extra money from wealthy parents.
    • Students were not required to pay back these loans until they were earning 21k and all loans would be wiped after 30 years.
    • Universities who charge more than £6k a year in tuition fees would bring in schemes to encourage underrepresented groups.
  • 60% of state schools were academies by 2015