Heavily criticised the 'educational establishment' which he describes as 'the blob'.
Said education had failed to enforce rigorous standards and had made qualifications too easy.
Easy qualifications led to the declining standards of the workforce
Coalition government
Took marketisation even further by creating academies and free schools.
Wanted to encourage 'excellence, competition and innovation' and introduce privatisation further.
Academies
All schools were encouraged to become academies, not just the failing ones.
The government would force schools that ere not satisfactory to become an academy and the ones deemed as 'outstanding' by Ofsted were invited to be one.
Academies could opt out of local authority control and receive all their funding from the government.
They took control of their curriculum and could manage their own admissions and appeals.
Evaluation of academies
The growth of academies created opportunities for more privatisation with some academies operating in chains run by businesses while being funded by the state.
Removes new labours focus on inequality by allowing any school to become an academy.
Increased fragmentation
Limited parental choice
Free schools
The aim of free schools was to create choice when the existing provision was poor.
Free schools could be set up by 'founding groups' which were religious groups, parent groups and teacher groups.
They had a good amount of control over their ethos and curriculum.
Managed their own admissions and appeals
Evaluation of free schools
Parental choice was limited in many areas as it continued to be difficult for children from disadvantaged backgrounds to get into their choice of school.
Swedish research suggests that free schools lower standards.
They are socially divisive.
Increased fragmentation.
Haralambos and Holborn
Reported that the national union of teachers argued that free schools and academies had led to a reduction in budget available to other schools.
Widened inequality.
Changes to the national curriculum
The national curriculum was made more traditional.
There was a focus on teaching grammar and fractions for 5 year olds.
Michael Gove set out a 'knowledge-based curriculum' rather than a focus on transferrable skills.
A levels were 'toughened up' with fewer resists allowed and vocational qualifications were downgraded
The EBACC was introduced. This took into account pupils performance in traditional academic subjects and narrowed the curriculum as schools focussed heavily on these subjects.
The effects of the coalitions austerity programme
Spending on education fell in the UK by almost 15% between 2010-11 and 2014-15 to pay off the country's debt.
Sure start provision was drastically reduced which reduced the opportunities for working class pupils.
Students fees were raised from £3000 to a maximum of £9000 which discouraged students from less affluent backgrounds.
Socially democratic influenced policies
Pupil premium
FSM
Funding for low-income high education students
Pupil premium
Aimed at providing extra resources for schools related to the number of pupils and students who were on low income.
Headteachers were given the choice on how to spend this money. They had to demonstrate its effectiveness in increasing educational opportunity for disadvantaged students.
Evaluation of pupil premium
Ofsted found that in many cases pupil premium is not spent on who it should be.
Only 1 in 10 headteachers said it has specifically changed how they supported students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Ratcliffe found that 53% of teachers said that pupil premium money was not being used to plug the gap left by decreased funding in education.
Funding for low-income high education students
Children from lower income families could get maintenance grants to cover the cost of living while at universities.
Larger loans were available for those from low income families who wouldn't be receiving extra money from wealthy parents.
Students were not required to pay back these loans until they were earning 21k and all loans would be wiped after 30 years.
Universities who charge more than £6k a year in tuition fees would bring in schemes to encourage underrepresented groups.