Series of activities designed to ensure that the organization gets the performance it needs from its employees
Performance Appraisal
Process of determining how well employees do their jobs relative to a standard and communicating that information to them
Effective Performance Management System
Make clear what the organization expects
Provide performance information to employees
Identify areas of success and needed development
Document performance for personal records
In some cultures, it is uncommon for managers to rate employees or to give direct feedback, and younger subordinates do not engage in joint discussions with their managers. Criticism from superiors is viewed as negative rather than as useful feedback.
Components of a Performance-Focused Culture
Presence/attendance on the job
Quality of output
Quantity of output
Timeliness of output
Efficiency of work completed
Effectiveness of work completed
Types of Performance Information
Trait-Based Information
Behavior-Based Information
Result-Based Information
Performance Standards
Definition of the expected levels of employee performance. They should be realistic, measurable, and clearly understood. They can be both numerical and non-numerical.
Measuring performance in service businesses can be difficult due to individualized services, great variation in the services that can be offered, and the subjective perception of quality. Common sources of performance differences include regional labor cost differences, service agreement differences, equipment/infrastructure differences, and work volume.
Uses for Performance Appraisals
Assess an employee's performance
Provide a platform for feedback
Help administering wages and salaries
Help identifying individual employee strengths and weaknesses
Provide answers to work-related questions
Help improve job performance
Ethics, Codes of conduct
Decisions about the Performance Appraisal Process
Appraisal Responsibilities (HR Unit vs. Managers)
Informal vs. Systematic Processes (Whenever vs. a regular time interval)
Timing of Appraisals (Annually, 2x a year)
Who Conducts Appraisals?
Supervisors rating their employees
Employees rating their superiors
Team members rating each other
Employees rating themselves
Outside sources (customers) rating employees
Multisource rating or 360 feedback
Tools for Appraising Performance
Category Scaling Methods
Graphic Rating Scales
Comparative Methods
Narrative Methods
Goal Setting and Management by Objectives (MBO)
Combination of Methods
Category Scaling Methods
Performance appraisal method that allows the rater to mark an employee's performance on a continuum indicating low to high levels of a particular characteristic
Graphic Rating Scale
Performance appraisal method that describes specific examples of job behavior which are then "anchored" or measured against a scale of performance levels
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)
Performance appraisal method that describes specific examples of job behavior which are then "anchored" or measured against a scale of performance levels
Ranking
Performance appraisal method in which employees are listed from highest to lowest in performance levels and relative contributions
Forced Distribution
Performance appraisal method in which the ratings of employees' performance levels are distributed along a bell-shaped curve
Critical Incident
Performance appraisal method in which the manager keeps a written record of highly favorable and unfavorable employee actions performed during the entire rating period
Essay
Performance appraisal method in which the manager writes a short essay describing an employee's performance during the rating period
Management by Objectives (MBO)
A specific performance appraisal method that highlights the performance goals that an individual and manager identify together
SMART
A model for setting targets: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Timely
No single appraisal method is best for all situations. A performance measurement system that uses a combination of methods may be sensible. Managers can choose and mix methods to accomplish what they want a performance appraisal system to do.
Performance Appraisals Training Topics
Appraisal process and timing
Performance criteria and job standards
Positive and negative feedback
Training and development goals
Compensation reviews
Common rating errors
Types of Rater Errors
Varying Standards
Recency and Primacy Effects
Central Tendency, Leniency, and Strictness
Rater Bias
Halo and Horns Effects
Contrast Error
Similar-to-Me/Different-from-Me Errors
Sampling Error
Appraisal Interview
Communicate employee's positive contributions, discuss to enable the employee to identify their own deficiencies and develop improvement plans
Typically, managers and employees have negative perceptions of appraisals, and they often avoid negative issues or provide biased ratings due to fear of having to confront or defend. Well-done appraisals are often viewed as constructive.
Characteristics of Effective Performance Management
High, average, low performers are clear
Beneficial as a development tool
Useful as an administrative tool
Legal and job-related
Viewed as fair by employees
Effective in documenting performance
Lead to higher employee motivation and satisfaction
There are challenges and solutions regarding performance appraisal, such as dissatisfaction, revision, new methods like micro feedback, gamification, preview (review), and self-service online application.