censorship imposed by government on expression, before expression takes place.
Unprotected speech
DIFFERENT from illegal speech (speech that goes against the law, irrespective of protected or unprotected) , just means not protected by first amendment
Ad-hoc Balancing
case by case; balancing Potential harm v.s. Value of speech. Tough to administer with little consistency.
Class Balancing
certain classes of speech have never been thought to raise constitutional issues. But this raises definitional issue and can produce counter-intuitive results
3 Part Miller Test (Obscenity) (ON EXAM)
1) Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest
2) Whether the work depicts or describes, in an offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions, as specifically defined by applicable state law
3) Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value
Defamation
statements that can harm your reputation. 3 elements are statement, identification, publication.
CommonLaw Defamation Defenses
statute of limitations, truth, privilege of participant, privilege of reporting, fair comment and criticism, consent (absolute), right of reply or self-defense, anti-SLAPP defense, community of interest
Definition of Broadcast Indecency (ON EXAM)
Whether the work depicts/describes in a patently offensive way sexual manner specifically defined by the applicable state law. (middle third of Miller)
The Communications Decency Act (CDA) (ON EXAM)
Amendment concerned about pornography and other sexual and indecent material on the internet reaching minors.
It included a provision to verify the age of site visitors.
Limitations of Children's Internet Protection Act (ChIPA)
Federal funding is limited to those libraries that install filtering software.
What are the three basic forms of an FTC cease and desist order? (ON EXAM)
1. Cease and desist
2. Affirmative disclosure
3. Corrective advertising
What are the four factors to be considered by a court evaluating a fair use defense in a copyright infringement case?
1. Natureofcopyrighted work (ex. is it fictions vs historical narrative)
2. Purposeoftheuse
3. Amount and substantiality of the work used in relation to the work as a whole (how much did you take? → qualitative or quantitative)
4. Effects on the value of or the market for the copyrighted work (i.e. How much damage did you do to the copyright holder?)
5 Types of Trademark
1. Generic
2. Not Found to beGeneric
3. DescriptiveMarks
4. SuggestiveMarks
5. ArbitraryMarks
Indecency
Portrays sexual or excretory organs or activities in a way that does not meet the three-prong test for obscenity.
Political Speech vs. Commercial Speech vs. Obscene Speech
Political: Most Protected
Commercial: Less Protected
Obscene: No protection
Three Prong test
Applied when commercial speech is not false or misleading:
1. substantial government interest
2. restrictiondirectlyadvances government interest
3. restriction is narrowly drawn
Copyright
System of protection for literary work or art that you have created
Copyright Act of 1976
Grants protection to original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or communicated directly or with the aid of machine or device (protects literature, music, dramatic, pictorial, sound)
Rights of Copyright
- Right to repair derivative works based on copyright work (sequels, diff medium) ○ Right to distribute copies of the copyrighted work to others
- Right to perform the work publicly, right to display the work publicly
- Right to display the work publicly through digital/audio transmission
- Right to reproduce
Children's Privacy Protection Act (CPPA)
Must have parental consent before collecting personal information for children under 13
Central-Hudson test
Tests whether an expression is protected by the First Amendment.
Determining factors:
Concern lawful activity and not be misleading.
Whether the asserted governmental interest is substantial.
Whether the regulation directly advances the governmental interest asserted.
Whether it is not more extensive than is necessary to serve that interest.