Bowlby proposed that children have one primary attachment figure - usually the mother - and that this is the most important attachment figure
Schaffer and Emerson propsed the theory that children can have multipleattachments- as they found in the Glasgow babies study that:
most babies formed attachments to their mothers at around 7 months old (specific attachment stage)
however secondary attachments e.g to the father formed shortly after
suggesting that, instead of one main attachments, infants can form multiple
multiple attachments may be advantageous:
babies who for multiple attachments are suggested to be better at conduction social relationships
as they have the experience to do so
as if one attachment figure is lost, they have more to turn to
the traditional role of the father:
fathers would go to work and mothers would stay at home with children
however society has moved on from this traditional view
and it has become the norm for mothers to work and more common for fathers to stay athome
therefore theorys of attachment - such as bowlby who claimed that’s mothers were the primarycaregiver - have moved on also
the three researchers associated with the role of the father are
grossman
Geiger
lamb
grossman
investigated the quality of either genders attachment on adolescent relationships
he conducted a longitudinal study on parents behaviours and how they linked to the quality of attachments the child went onto form
Found:
the quality of attachment with the mother affected the adolescent relationships of the child
the quality of attachment with the father did not
ultimatley suggesting that attachment to the father was less important
the quality of the fathers play however, did affect
suggesting fathers hold a playmate role and mothers hold a caregiver Role
Geiger
followed the fact that fathers play influenced babies adolescent attachments
showed that fathers play interactions with babies were more stimulating and pleasurable than ones with the mothers
further highlighting the role of a father as a playmate
lamb
contradicted grossman and Geiger who portrayed the fathers attachment as less important
lamb found that fathers who assume the position of maincaregiver are able to répond sensitively to children’s needs and become a safe base for them - suggesting a secure attachment is formed
this shows that sensitive responsiveness and nurturing behaviour is not biologically limited to women
and attatchment is based on the level of responsiveness to needs and not the gender of the parent
Role of the father: — research into role of the father is inconsistent
Grossman, Geiger and lamb are investigating different questions
so it would be expected they have different findings
grossman and Geiger are investigating fathers as secondaryattachment figures, concluding they have a distinct secondray playmate role
whilst lamb investigated fathers ad primary attachment figures concluding that men can act in the same way
this leads to an overall, unclear role of the father as the findings are heavily dependent on the area of investigation
role of the father: +importance of the role of the father is highlighted by negative developmental outcomes when absent
children with more secure attachments to the father are seen to have less behavioural problems and good peerrelationships
whereas children who grow up without are seen to be more agressive and not perform as well at school
highlingting how influential the role of the father is in development
role of the father :— studies into absent fathers and the effect that they have mostly investigate single mothers from poor-socio economic backgrounds
so the negative developmental outcomes of the children may be because of social and environmental influences
rather than their absentfather
this undermines the research stating that the role of the father is influential
as it is unclear where negative developmental outcomes actually originate from