Improving accuracy of EWT

Cards (10)

  • Standard Interview
    • EWT is inaccurate, numerous studies have shown factors such as anxiety, leading questions and post-event discussion decrease the accuracy of EWT.
    • Fisher Studied techniques used by police and found that they lead to inaccuracy.
    • Leading to the development of the Cognitive Interview
  • Cognitive Interview
    • A range of techniques that Fisher and Gieslmean suggested police interviewers can use to improve the accuracy of EWT
  • Fisher (1987)
    • The following factors were identified as needing an improvement in the standard interview.
    1. Witnesses were given a large number of quick, direct and closed questions.
    2. The order of questions were not asked in a way that matched witnesses mental representation
    3. Witnesses were not able to talk freely about their experience, were frequently interrupted.
  • features of the Cognitive interview
    • Context reinstatement.
    • Report Everything
    • Recall from a Changed Perspective
    • Recall in Reverse order
  • Context reinstatement
    • Based on cue dependant forgetting
    • Mentally returning to the scene of the crime.
    • Includes physical environment and emotional state.
  • Report Everything
    • All details, even if they seem irrelevant should be mentioned as this triggers memories.
  • Recall from a Changed Perspective.
    • Mentally recreate how the crime would be recalled from a different perspective of a witness.
    • Gives a holistic view of the event, minimising bias.
  • Recall in Reverse Order
    • Recall is switched to different timelines.
    • Eg. end to beginning, or middle to start.
    • Challenges schema.
  • Enhanced Cognitive Interview
    • Focused on making the interviewee comfortable by...
    1. Interviewer not distracting witness
    2. Witness controlling flow of info.
    3. Open-ended questions.
    4. Reminded not to guess and use, the "don't know" option.
    5. Reduce anxiety in witnesses and give them time to relax.
  • Research support. - Fisher, Geilsman and Amador.
    • A field study to compare 7 detectives trained in Cognitive interview compared with 9 using standard interviews.
    • Found CI trained detectives received 47% more info after their training and 63% more info than untrained detectives.
    • Suggests the cognitive interview is effective.