follow a 24-hour cycle: e.g. the sleep-waking cycle
there must be an endogenous pace maker/ internalbodyclock that keeps this pattern and we are aware of conflicts between the the EP and exogenouszeitgebers like light and socialcues
endogenous pacemakers
internal body clocks that keep biologicalprocesses to time
exogenousZeitgebers
external cues that entraininternal body clocks, meaning altering body clocks to match the environment
suprachiasmaticnucleus (SCN)
endogenouspacemaker for sleep-wake
closely linked to the pineal gland
part of hypothalamus
located at opticchiasm
effect of endogenouspacemakers on sleepwakecycle
SCN: mainendogenouspacemaker. It controlsotherbiological rhythms, links to other areas of the brain responsible for sleep/arousal.
it receives information about lightlevels (an exogenouszeitgeber) from the opticnerve - sets the circadian rhythm so that it is in synchronisation with the outsideworld, e.g. day and night.
it sends signals to the pinealgland, increasingproduction of melatonininducingsleep. The SCN and pineal glands work together; however, their activity is responsive to the externalcue of light.
Siffre (1975)
thought circadianrhythm to be freerunning without entrainment
suffer tested this
spent 6months in cave with nonaturallight or other EZ's like clocks/cues
his bodyclock maintained 25hour cycle, longer than expected 24hrs
suggesting EP for sleepwakecycle is freerunning but needs entrainment to stick to 24hrs
criticism of naturallightisolation study
psychologists have criticised use of artificial lights in isolation experiments , suggesting artificiallightsdisruptedmeasurements of freerunning circling rhythm by acting as an EZ.
in study controllingartificial light Czeisler found the circadianrhythm was closer to 24hrs
evidenceSCN is EP (Ralph)
golden hamsters with tau mutation have circadian rhythms of 20 hours compared with 24 hours for normal golden hamsters
when SCN from normalhamsters was transplanted into brain of Taumutanthamsters, they gained a sleep wake cycle of 24hours
suggests SCN is mainendogenous pacemaker
effect of exogenouszeitgebers on sleep-wake
The most important zeitgeber is light, responsible for resetting the bodyclock each day, keeping it on a 24hr cycle.
The SCN contains receptors that are sensitive to light and this external cue is used to synchronise the body’sinternalorgans and glands.Melanopsin, which is a protein in the eye, is sensitive to light and carries the signals to the SCN to set the 24-hour daily body cycle. In addition, socialcues, such as mealtimes, can also act as zeitgebers and humans can compensate for the lack of natural light, by using socialcues instead.
(weakness) biologicallyreductionist
Despite all the research support for the role of endogenous pacemakers and exogenous zeitgebers, the argument could still be considered biologicallyreductionist.
it only considers a singularbiologicalmechanism and fails to consider the other widely divergent viewpoints.
(strength) practicalapplications
psychologicalunderstanding of negativeimpacts of shiftwork and will hopefully lead to solution.
This suggests that there may be practicaluses in an improved understanding of the effects of desynchronisation. This in turn has economicalimplications, in terms of companies who employshift-workers making the effort to revise their policies in order to reduce days taken off sick.
(weakness) lacksvalidity
Siffre's results may not be generaliseable to the population, as individualdifferences in the duration and stages of circadian rhythms has been shown, results may lackecologicalvalidity.
Siffre himself noted that as he grew older, his endogenouspacemaker ticked at a slowerrate, which may have acted as an uncontrolledconfoundingvariable in his investigations.
This limits the extent to which the findingsrepresent the experiences of the general population.
(weakness) individualdifferencesDuffy et al. (2001
found that ‘morningpeople’ prefer to rise and go to bedearly (about 6am and 10pm) whereas ‘evening people’ prefer to wake and go to bed later (about 10 am and 1 am). This demonstrates that there may be innate individual differences in circadian rhythms, which suggests that researchers should focus on these differences during investigations.