The state of not being equal, especially in status, rights, and access to opportunities
Psychologists are concerned about inequality because it has negative emotional consequences, including stigmatization, perceived injustice, lower self-esteem, and lower health
Inequality in education
Measured through data and numbers
Linked to socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, and disability
Measuring inequality in education
1. Open Gapminder
2. Click on 'Life Expectancy' tab
3. Click on 'Education' folder
4. Select 'OWID Education Index'
5. Explore the data
The UK has significant inequality in education, with factors like socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, and disability contributing to attainment gaps
Public sector expenditure in the UK (2014)
Defence
Public order & safety
Pensions
Transport
Welfare
Health Care
Recreation, culture & religion
Schools
Universities and further education
Structural inequality is a social structure that has inequality already "built in", with hierarchical differences between people that affect access to resources and unequal opportunities
Education inequality
Can lead to income inequality, inequality of opportunity, and health inequality
More unequal societies tend to have higher rates of ill health and social problems, which can be measured using the Gini index
Inequality in education starts early, with socioeconomic status influencing brain development and school readiness
Children from poor families are more likely to have poor qualifications and are less likely to go to university
Significant links between SES and changes in brain structure, e.g., areas related to memory, executive control, and emotion
By age three, being in poverty makes a difference equivalent to nine months' development in school readiness
During their years at school, children in receipt of free school meals (a key indicator of poverty) do progressively worse on average at school than their peers
Children who do badly at primary school are less likely to improve at secondary school if they are poor
Children from poor families are more likely to have poor qualifications
Young people with parents in manual occupations are far less likely than others to go to university and only 1 in 6 of students at top universities come from lower socio-economic backgrounds
The poorer an area the pupil comes from the worse their GCSE performance, but picture different in London
Ethnic variation in outcomes at later ages still remains
Harder access to high-tariff universities
Under-represented at Russell Group universities and on apprenticeship schemes
Russell Group universities have lower levels of student admissions from people from ethnic minority backgrounds, as well as students from state schools and low-income backgrounds, indicating stratification within the higher education system in Britain
Awarding gap and experience gap and this is different according to ethnicity
Overall prevalence of ADHD is 3% to 10% in school-aged children
ADHD is diagnosed in boys 3 to 4 times more often than in girls
ADHD persists in 30% to 50% into adolescence and adulthood (symptom profile may change)
ADHD
Strong genetic component (approx. 76%)
Perinatal factors – some evidence
Neurobiological deficits – growing evidence
Deprivation and family factors – important for course and outcome
The idea of epigenetics
Children with ADHD came from families below the poverty line with average family income at £324 per week, compared to £391 for those whose child did not have ADHD
The odds of parents in social housing having a child with ADHD was roughly three times greater than for those who owned their own homes
At least one in five students with ADHD receive no school services despite experiencing significant academic and social difficulties
Most evident for adolescents, youth from non-English-speaking, and/or lower-income families
Governments tackle inequality through social policy
Inequality in education is a global and persistent issue
Numbers help us to understand inequality in education
Data informs the design, delivery & evaluation of interventions