Their research involved inventing questions and jointly examining their intuitive answers, identifying and analyzing intuitions that they believed would be shared by many people
They proposed that people use simplifying heuristics (rules of thumb) to make difficult judgments, which can lead to predictable biases (systematic errors)
Their article "Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases" published in Science magazine in the 1970s challenged the prevailing assumptions about human nature and rationality
The ideas of heuristics and biases have been used productively in many fields, including medical diagnosis, legal judgment, intelligence analysis, philosophy, finance, statistics, and military strategy
The availability heuristic helps explain why some issues are highly salient in the public's mind while others are neglected, as the media's coverage corresponds to their view of what is currently on the public's mind
The importance of issues is determined by the ease with which they are retrieved from memory, which is largely determined by the extent of coverage in the media
There is little coverage of critical but unexciting issues that provide less drama, such as declining educational standards or overinvestment of medical resources in the last year of life
A key reason for the broad appeal of "heuristics and biases" outside psychology was that the full text of the questions were included in the articles, allowing readers to recognize how their own thinking was tripped up by cognitive biases
The reaction to the work on heuristics and biases was not uniformly positive, with some criticism that it suggested an unfairly negative view of the mind
The idea that our minds are susceptible to systematic errors is now generally accepted, and the research on judgment had far more effect on social science than the authors thought possible
The book aims to present a view of how the mind works that draws on recent developments in cognitive and social psychology, including understanding the marvels as well as the flaws of intuitive thought
The authors did not address accurate intuitions beyond the casual statement that judgment heuristics "are quite useful, but sometimes lead to severe and systematic errors"
Many professionals' intuitions do not arise from true expertise, but rather from the affect heuristic where judgments and decisions are guided directly by feelings of liking and disliking
The book explores the difficulties of statistical thinking, our excessive confidence in what we believe we know, and our inability to acknowledge the full extent of our ignorance and the uncertainty of the world
The book provides a current view, informed by the two-system model, of the key concepts of prospect theory and ways human choices deviate from the rules of rationality
The concluding chapter explores the implications of the distinctions drawn in the book, including for organizations to improve the quality of judgments and decisions
How two selves within a single body can pursue happiness raises some difficult questions, both for individuals and for societies that view the well-being of the population as a policy objective
The book explores the implications of three distinctions: between the experiencing and the remembering selves, between the conception of agents in classical economics and in behavioral economics, and between the automatic System 1 and the effortful System 2