Direct democracy: the people vote directly on policy
The individual expresses their own opinion E.g. referendums
Representative democracy: the people vote for representatives to vote on their behalf
The individual delegates their authority to the representative E.g. general election
Different types of representation:
Causal- representing a cause/ idea like environmental change
Party- a group with similar views, usually have a manifesto
Constituency- a local representative who want what's best for the community
Occupational- representing a certain group, like groups that support trade unions
Social- implies that representatives should mirror the diversity of its people, like 50% men and women, range of ethnicities, and ages or class backgrounds
National- what the whole nation wants rather than just the local representative
Direct Democracy has:
Equal weight to all votes
Removes need for trusted reps as the individual takes responsibility
Encourages participation as it is their duty as a citizen
Reduces the chances of the tyranny of the majority
However, is open to manipulation by word of mouth
Impractical on a large scale for decision making
Will of the majority is not mediated by parliament etc so minority viewpoints likely ignored
Representative Democracy is:
Only practical on a large scale where a quick response is needed
Politicians are better informed than general public
Political parties cause pressure groups which promote debate and pluralism- increasing democracy
However, may lead to reduced participation as the public delegate their responsibility to representatives
Parties/PGs promote their own agendas and not the peoples
Minorities are still underrepresented
Politicians can easily avoid accountability due to length between general elections
Politicians can betray election promises
Democratic deficit:
Restrictions upon voters suggests there is a democratic deficit-
Felons who serve over 12 months cannot vote
ID is required to vote, which is not free- disenfranchising the vote further
Citizens are arrested for riots/ protests- which is reducing democracy and free speech
Types of participation: conventional and unconventional
Voting (conventional)
Joining a party (conventional)
Trade unions (conventional)
Protesting
E-petitions
Pressure groups
E-voting
Campaigning
Strikes
Evidence of a participation crisis:
Decreasing voter turnout suggests a large participation crisis- suggesting loss of faith in the governmental system or a lack of resonating with gov. policy
Post ww2- over 80% voter turnout
2001- 59.4% (all time low- public was happy with his policies)
2015- 66%
2017- 68.8%
2019- 67.3%
Widening the franchise: Votes at 16
16 and 17 yr olds were allowed to vote in the scottish referendum
Lowering the voting age will promote political engagement from a younger age
It aligns with social responsibility- leaving school, joining the military, paying tax etc
Educates the younger generation of the importance of voting
They're at the age where they are directly impacted by political decisions- education, employment, healthcare etc
It is discriminatory to deny them the right
Widening the franchise: Votes at 16
16yr olds do not possess the maturity required to vote and may lack understanding
Voting age should be consistent with responsibilities- drinking age, signing contracts, serving on a jury etc
Concerns over the amount of political knowledge a 16yr old has and may not have received the education to support this
Can sway election dynamics- politicians more inclined to appeal to the younger generation
16yr olds can be easily persuaded by parents and friends to vote for who they want them to
They may also be open to political propaganda and exploitation
Acts to widen the franchise:
1832 Reform act- increased the franchise to more men, redistributed seats, and tackled electoral corruption
1918, 1928, and 1969 Representation of the people act- equally widened the franchise to women, and lowered the voting age to 18
Sectional pressure groups- look after their own section of society, often closed membership E.g. Stonewall, Age UK
Promotional pressure groups- campaign for a cause or issue, often open membership E.g. Extinction rebellion, PETA, Just stop oil
Insider groups- have a special relationship with the government and have access to officials, thus use more legal methods E.g. Age UK- leaflets, adverts, posters
Outsider groups- no close link with the government and resort to generating press attention E.g. PETA- vandalism, riots
Extinction Rebellion (Outsider, promotional)
Aims- to reduce the impacts of climate change
Methods- social media outreach, marches, rallies, and fly posting
Success- raised £100,000 in 24hrs for their cause, raised awareness of the climate crisis to 81% in the uk and allowing the public to become more engaged in their cause
Failures- while attempting to disrupt Johnson’s convey on the way to PMQs they were forcefully dragged away by police and publicly failed at raising awareness for their issue
RMT (Insider, promotional)
Aims- promotion of better pay and conditions for its members
Methods- negotiates contracts with major transport companies, lobbies the government for better legislative protections, organises strikes
Success-helped members bring legal cases forward (like a £55,000 payment to a member who lost a finger in an incident), secured bonus payments for workers during the 2012 olympics, created a credit union to aid members financially
Failures- not all its campaigns for higher wages and better conditions were met with high success
Factors for success: PGs
Size
Funding
Public opinion
Government attitude
Strategic position (importance to society e.g. NHS unions)
Hyper pluralism (multiple groups for the same cause)
Alternate forms of influence:
Think tanks- carry out research and develop policies to influence politicians E.g. The Institute of Economic Affairs focus on the economy and the free market
Lobbyists- persuade those in power to follow a course of action which is fundamental to democracy E.g. the PLMR contains ex civil servants and former special advisors to campaign for causes they believe in
Alternate forms of influence:
Corporations and industry- large corporations will make their own PGs to campaign their own causes E.g. Google, Facebook, Starbucks were successful in resisting calls to pay more tax on profits
Trade unions- protect the interests of their members by negotiating working conditions E.g. unison
The development of rights:
Common law is established by judges in the UK who declare what rights are granted to the public
The Magna Carta 1215- England's first statute which limited the power of the sovereign
The Development of Rights:
The HRA 1998- made the European convention of Human Rights enforceable in UK courts
Meaning courts had a means of protecting citizen rights and were respected and protected by law
Freedom of Information Act 2000- meant citizens could view information directly about them, also ensured openness and transparency within the UK government
The Daily Telegraph could expose MP expenditure
Equality Act 2010- ensured protection of race, disability, age, gender, marriage, religion, and sexual orientation
How PGs contribute to the protection of rights in the UK:
Liberty
Aims- challenge injustice, defend freedom, and campaign to ensure everyone in the UK is treated fairly
Success- campaigned for the release of over 100 iraqi nationals, campaigned for the reform of the mental health system and released 2000 inmates
Failures- lost high court challenge against surveillance laws
How PGs contribute to the protection of rights in the UK:
Stonewall
Aims- equal rights for queer people
Success- campaigned to get rid of section 28, campaigned for gay marriage, campaigned for the protection of queer people against workplace discrimination
Failures- queer people are still largely discriminated against
How PGs contribute to the protection of rights in the UK:
Howard League for Penal Reform
Aims- a charity that aims to help/ aid prisoners
Success- won the children's act case meaning incarcerated children were protected and treated as children, worked with over 22000 children to explore the issues of crime and raise awareness
Failures- still struggle to combat overcrowding and poor living conditions in some prisons
Individual rights vs collective rights:
In 2008 Christian B&B owners refused to allow civil partners to share a room as they weren't ‘married’-The civil partners won after appealing to the courts
Electoral systems:
Northern Irish assembly: STV- Every 5 years
Scottish parliament: AMS- Every 5 years
Welsh assembly: AMS- Every 5 years
England :
Westminster: FPTP- Every 5 years
London assembly: AMS- Every 4 years
London mayor: SV- Every 4 years
Local elections: FPTP- Every 5 years
FPTP:
Leads to a strong majority government
Simple for voters
Strong MP-constituency link
Stops extremists from running
However, there is a lack of choice
A majority is not required to win
Unequal vote value
Leads to 2 party dominance
Benefits the winning party- more seats than votes
AMS:
More proportional than FPTP
Greater voter choice
Increases representation
Government has broad popularity
However, it is more complicated/ harder to understand
Unlikely to produce a single party government
May create an unstable government
STV:
More proportional than FPTP
Greater voter choice
Increases representation
However, it is more complicated/harder to understand
Unlikely to produce a single party government
Weak MP-constituency link
SV:
Simple for voters
Majority result wins
Greater voter choice
However, it leads to 2 party dominance
Can lead to wasted votes
Can lead to a false majority- does not reflect popular vote
First pass the post (FPTP):
Electoral system where the candidate with the highest votes is elected- a plurality system
Additional member system (AMS):
A hybrid election system- the voter votes for a representative on a FPTP system, and then a second vote for a second or 'additional' representative
Single transferable vote (STV):
Voters rank their voting preferences, and for a candidate to gain a seat they must reach a 'quota'- candidates with fewest votes are eliminated and their votes transferred to other candidates
Supplementary vote (SV):
Majoritarian system where the voter makes two choices- candidate must obtain over 50%, if not achieved the top two candidates remain and second vote is redistributed
Election results: FPTP
2017:
Con. 318/49% of seats, but 42.4% of popular vote
Lab. 262/40% of seats, and 40% of popular vote
Lib. 12/1.8% of seats but 7.4% of popular vote
2019:
Con. 365/57% of seats, but 43.6% of popular vote
Lab. 203/31% of seats, and 32.2% of popular vote
Lib. 11/1.7% of seats but 11.5% of popular vote
Referendums are used to give the public a voice on a nationwide issue:
Prevents civil unrest
Holds the government to account
Increases democracy
A response to public pressure
Resolves inter-party splits
However, they can cause issues for the government:
Trigger another election
Increase loss of faith in the government
Trigger PM resignation
May not solve the issue- divides UK (Brexit)
Referendums since 1997:
Replacement of FPTP with AV system 2011- 42% turnout
Yes 32.1% and No 67.9%
Scottish independence 2014- 84.6% turnout
55% rejected leaving the UK
Tyranny of the majority (45% ignored)
Still a long standing issue for Scotland
Divided Scotland
Brexit 2016- 72.2% turnout
51.9% voted leave
Tyranny of the majority (48.1% ignored)
David Cameron resigned
Brexit deal was prolonged
Split parliament and caused divided government
Arguments for and against referendums:
If it is a large nationwide issue then the public should have a say
Solves constitutional issues with no set precedent
Gives regional assemblies more power and they are more likely to be listened to
However, a MPs job is to represent the people and therefore is no reason for them to vote
Undermines MP and Parliamentary power
Used as bargaining tools in the political climate
Function and features of political parties:
Representation- allows parties represent large sections of the electorate’s interests and opinions
However, there is a lack of balance between party support and seats
Participation- encourages increased turnout and engagement in politics through the MP-constituent link
This means voter become loyal, however party membership is on the decline