Politics Paper 1

Cards (80)

  • Direct democracy: the people vote directly on policy
    The individual expresses their own opinion E.g. referendums
  • Representative democracy: the people vote for representatives to vote on their behalf
    The individual delegates their authority to the representative E.g. general election
  • Different types of representation:
    • Causal- representing a cause/ idea like environmental change
    • Party- a group with similar views, usually have a manifesto
    • Constituency- a local representative who want what's best for the community
    • Occupational- representing a certain group, like groups that support trade unions
    • Social- implies that representatives should mirror the diversity of its people, like 50% men and women, range of ethnicities, and ages or class backgrounds
    • National- what the whole nation wants rather than just the local representative
  • Direct Democracy has:
    • Equal weight to all votes
    • Removes need for trusted reps as the individual takes responsibility
    • Encourages participation as it is their duty as a citizen
    • Reduces the chances of the tyranny of the majority
    • However, is open to manipulation by word of mouth
    • Impractical on a large scale for decision making
    • Will of the majority is not mediated by parliament etc so minority viewpoints likely ignored
  • Representative Democracy is:
    • Only practical on a large scale where a quick response is needed
    • Politicians are better informed than general public
    • Political parties cause pressure groups which promote debate and pluralism- increasing democracy
    • However, may lead to reduced participation as the public delegate their responsibility to representatives
    • Parties/PGs promote their own agendas and not the peoples
    • Minorities are still underrepresented
    • Politicians can easily avoid accountability due to length between general elections
    • Politicians can betray election promises
  • Democratic deficit:
    Restrictions upon voters suggests there is a democratic deficit-
    • Felons who serve over 12 months cannot vote
    • ID is required to vote, which is not free- disenfranchising the vote further
    • Citizens are arrested for riots/ protests- which is reducing democracy and free speech
  • Types of participation: conventional and unconventional
    • Voting (conventional)
    • Joining a party (conventional)
    • Trade unions (conventional)
    • Protesting
    • E-petitions
    • Pressure groups
    • E-voting
    • Campaigning
    • Strikes
  • Evidence of a participation crisis:
    Decreasing voter turnout suggests a large participation crisis- suggesting loss of faith in the governmental system or a lack of resonating with gov. policy
    • Post ww2- over 80% voter turnout
    •  2001- 59.4% (all time low- public was happy with his policies)
    • 2015- 66%
    • 2017- 68.8%
    •  2019- 67.3%
  • Widening the franchise: Votes at 16

    • 16 and 17 yr olds were allowed to vote in the scottish referendum
    • Lowering the voting age will promote political engagement from a younger age
    • It aligns with social responsibility- leaving school, joining the military, paying tax etc
    • Educates the younger generation of the importance of voting
    • They're at the age where they are directly impacted by political decisions- education, employment, healthcare etc
    • It is discriminatory to deny them the right
  • Widening the franchise: Votes at 16
    • 16yr olds do not possess the maturity required to vote and may lack understanding
    • Voting age should be consistent with responsibilities- drinking age, signing contracts, serving on a jury etc
    • Concerns over the amount of political knowledge a 16yr old has and may not have received the education to support this
    • Can sway election dynamics- politicians more inclined to appeal to the younger generation
    • 16yr olds can be easily persuaded by parents and friends to vote for who they want them to
    • They may also be open to political propaganda and exploitation
  • Acts to widen the franchise:
    • 1832 Reform act- increased the franchise to more men, redistributed seats, and tackled electoral corruption
    • 1918, 1928, and 1969 Representation of the people act- equally widened the franchise to women, and lowered the voting age to 18
  • Sectional pressure groups- look after their own section of society, often closed membership E.g. Stonewall, Age UK
  • Promotional pressure groups- campaign for a cause or issue, often open membership E.g. Extinction rebellion, PETA, Just stop oil
  • Insider groups- have a special relationship with the government and have access to officials, thus use more legal methods E.g. Age UK- leaflets, adverts, posters
  • Outsider groups- no close link with the government and resort to generating press attention E.g. PETA- vandalism, riots 
  • Extinction Rebellion (Outsider, promotional) 
    • Aims- to reduce the impacts of climate change
    • Methods- social media outreach, marches, rallies, and fly posting
    • Success- raised £100,000 in 24hrs for their cause, raised awareness of the climate crisis to 81% in the uk and allowing the public to become more engaged in their cause
    • Failures- while attempting to disrupt Johnson’s convey on the way to PMQs they were forcefully dragged away by police and publicly failed at raising awareness for their issue
  • RMT (Insider, promotional)
    • Aims- promotion of better pay and conditions for its members
    • Methods- negotiates contracts with major transport companies, lobbies the government for better legislative protections, organises strikes
    • Success-helped members bring legal cases forward (like a £55,000 payment to a member who lost a finger in an incident), secured bonus payments for workers during the 2012 olympics, created a credit union to aid members financially
    • Failures- not all its campaigns for higher wages and better conditions were met with high success
  • Factors for success: PGs
    • Size
    • Funding
    • Public opinion
    • Government attitude
    • Strategic position (importance to society e.g. NHS unions)
    • Hyper pluralism (multiple groups for the same cause)
  • Alternate forms of influence:
    • Think tanks- carry out research and develop policies to influence politicians E.g. The Institute of Economic Affairs focus on the economy and the free market
    • Lobbyists- persuade those in power to follow a course of action which is fundamental to democracy E.g. the PLMR contains ex civil servants and former special advisors to campaign for causes they believe in
  • Alternate forms of influence:
    • Corporations and industry- large corporations will make their own PGs to campaign their own causes E.g. Google, Facebook, Starbucks were successful in resisting calls to pay more tax on profits
    • Trade unions- protect the interests of their members by negotiating working conditions E.g. unison 
  • The development of rights:
    • Common law is established by judges in the UK who declare what rights are granted to the public
    • The Magna Carta 1215- England's first statute which limited the power of the sovereign
  • The Development of Rights:
    • The HRA 1998- made the European convention of Human Rights enforceable in UK courts
    • Meaning courts had a means of protecting citizen rights and were respected and protected by law
    • Freedom of Information Act 2000- meant citizens could view information directly about them, also ensured openness and transparency within the UK government
    • The Daily Telegraph could expose MP expenditure
    • Equality Act 2010- ensured protection of race, disability, age, gender, marriage, religion, and sexual orientation
  • How PGs contribute to the protection of rights in the UK:
    Liberty
    • Aims- challenge injustice, defend freedom, and campaign to ensure everyone in the UK is treated fairly
    • Success- campaigned for the release of over 100 iraqi nationals, campaigned for the reform of the mental health system and released 2000 inmates
    • Failures- lost high court challenge against surveillance laws
  • How PGs contribute to the protection of rights in the UK:
    Stonewall
    • Aims- equal rights for queer people
    • Success- campaigned to get rid of section 28, campaigned for gay marriage, campaigned for the protection of queer people against workplace discrimination
    • Failures- queer people are still largely discriminated against
  • How PGs contribute to the protection of rights in the UK:
    Howard League for Penal Reform
    • Aims- a charity that aims to help/ aid prisoners 
    • Success- won the children's act case meaning incarcerated children were protected and treated as children, worked with over 22000 children to explore the issues of crime and raise awareness
    • Failures- still struggle to combat overcrowding and poor living conditions in some prisons
  • Individual rights vs collective rights:
    • In 2008 Christian B&B owners refused to allow civil partners to share a room as they weren't ‘married’-The civil partners won after appealing to the courts
  • Electoral systems:
    • Northern Irish assembly: STV- Every 5 years
    • Scottish parliament: AMS- Every 5 years
    • Welsh assembly: AMS- Every 5 years
    • England :
    • Westminster: FPTP- Every 5 years
    • London assembly: AMS- Every 4 years
    • London mayor: SV- Every 4 years
    • Local elections: FPTP- Every 5 years
  • FPTP:
    • Leads to a strong majority government
    • Simple for voters
    • Strong MP-constituency link
    • Stops extremists from running
    • However, there is a lack of choice
    • A majority is not required to win
    • Unequal vote value
    • Leads to 2 party dominance
    • Benefits the winning party- more seats than votes
  • AMS:
    • More proportional than FPTP
    • Greater voter choice
    • Increases representation
    • Government has broad popularity
    • However, it is more complicated/ harder to understand
    • Unlikely to produce a single party government
    • May create an unstable government
  • STV:
    • More proportional than FPTP
    • Greater voter choice
    • Increases representation
    • However, it is more complicated/harder to understand
    • Unlikely to produce a single party government
    • Weak MP-constituency link
  • SV:
    • Simple for voters
    • Majority result wins
    • Greater voter choice
    • However, it leads to 2 party dominance
    • Can lead to wasted votes
    • Can lead to a false majority- does not reflect popular vote
  • First pass the post (FPTP):
    Electoral system where the candidate with the highest votes is elected- a plurality system
  • Additional member system (AMS):
    A hybrid election system- the voter votes for a representative on a FPTP system, and then a second vote for a second or 'additional' representative
  • Single transferable vote (STV):
    Voters rank their voting preferences, and for a candidate to gain a seat they must reach a 'quota'- candidates with fewest votes are eliminated and their votes transferred to other candidates
  • Supplementary vote (SV):
    Majoritarian system where the voter makes two choices- candidate must obtain over 50%, if not achieved the top two candidates remain and second vote is redistributed
  • Election results: FPTP
    2017:
    • Con. 318/49% of seats, but 42.4% of popular vote
    • Lab. 262/40% of seats, and 40% of popular vote
    • Lib. 12/1.8% of seats but 7.4% of popular vote
    2019:
    • Con. 365/57% of seats, but 43.6% of popular vote
    • Lab. 203/31% of seats, and 32.2% of popular vote
    • Lib. 11/1.7% of seats but 11.5% of popular vote
  • Referendums are used to give the public a voice on a nationwide issue:
    • Prevents civil unrest
    • Holds the government to account
    • Increases democracy
    • A response to public pressure
    • Resolves inter-party splits
    • However, they can cause issues for the government:
    • Trigger another election
    • Increase loss of faith in the government
    • Trigger PM resignation
    • May not solve the issue- divides UK (Brexit)
  • Referendums since 1997:
    Replacement of FPTP with AV system 2011- 42% turnout
    • Yes 32.1% and No 67.9%
    Scottish independence 2014- 84.6% turnout
    • 55% rejected leaving the UK
    • Tyranny of the majority (45% ignored)
    • Still a long standing issue for Scotland
    • Divided Scotland
    Brexit 2016- 72.2% turnout
    • 51.9% voted leave
    • Tyranny of the majority (48.1% ignored)
    • David Cameron resigned
    • Brexit deal was prolonged
    • Split parliament and caused divided government
  • Arguments for and against referendums:
    • If it is a large nationwide issue then the public should have a say
    • Solves constitutional issues with no set precedent 
    • Gives regional assemblies more power and they are more likely to be listened to
    • However, a MPs job is to represent the people and therefore is no reason for them to vote
    • Undermines MP and Parliamentary power
    • Used as bargaining tools in the political climate
  • Function and features of political parties:
    • Representation- allows parties represent large sections of the electorate’s interests and opinions
    • However, there is a lack of balance between party support and seats
    • Participation- encourages increased turnout and engagement in politics through the MP-constituent link
    • This means voter become loyal, however party membership is on the decline