Discrimination against workers on the basis of race, skin color, religion, gender, pregnancy, national origin, disability, age (if the employee is at least 40 years old), or union membership
Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is likewise illegal in some locales
Discrimination against people with disabilities is prohibited by the Americans with Disabilities Act
Discrimination against United States citizens employed abroad by United States companies is prohibited by the Civil Rights Act of 1991
Discrimination on the basis of age is prohibited by the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Statestatutes prohibit discrimination on grounds similar to the federal statutes, and many encompass additional protected classes, including marital status and arrest and conviction record
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
The federal statute that outlaws most grounds for discrimination
Title VII prohibits discrimination not only in hiring and firing but also in promotion, access to training, disciplining, work assignments, shift assignments, vacation time, and more
Disparate treatment discrimination
Intentional discrimination based on considerations of race, color, religion, gender or nationalorigin
Disparate impact discrimination
Neutral practices that result, often unintentionally, in unequal treatment
TitleVII covers employers with 15 or more employees
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is a federal government agency charged with enforcing Title VI's mandates
Filing a Complaint
1. Employee files a discrimination charge with the EEOC
2. EEOC investigates and assesses the claim
3. If EEOC finds grounds, it prepares a complaint and forwards it to the employer
4. EEOC meets with the employer to try to reach a resolution
5. If EEOC fails to act within 180 days, employee can request a right-to-sue letter
6. Employee has 90 days to file a lawsuit in federal court after receiving the right-to-sue letter
Remedies available to a successful plaintiff in a Title VII case
Injunction
Court order requiring the employer to adopt a policy forbidding discrimination and implement it
Attorney's fees
Back pay
Compensatory damages
Include future monetary losses, emotional pain and suffering, mental anguish, and other nonmonetary losses
Punitive damages
Can be awarded when the employer engaged in illegal discrimination "with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights" of the employee
The Civil Rights Act of 1991 places a cap on the amount an employer will be obligated to pay (exclusive of back pay) in any one suit involving gender, religion, or national origin discrimination
Bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ)
Relieves an employer from liability for disparate treatment discrimination where selection of an employee based on gender, religion, age, or national origin is reasonably necessary for the normal operation of the employer's business
Business necessity
May relieve an employer of liability for disparate impact discrimination if a neutral selection criterion has an obvious relationship to job performance
Prohibited interview questions
Questions about race, national origin, citizenship, age, marital status, children, religion, disabilities or medical conditions, and arrest record
Permissible interview questions
Questions about authorization to work in the US, ability to meet minimum age requirements, willingness to relocate/travel/work overtime, ability to perform job functions, and job-related criminal convictions
Title VII outlaws discriminatory preference for any racial group, minority or majority
Title VII prohibits all types of racial discrimination, including refusal to hire, resistance to promote, unjustified firings, and other discrimination such as refusing to allow an Afro-American hairstyle or terminating a white employee for associating with a black colleague
An employer can defend against a claim of discriminatory firing by establishing a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the termination
A charge of discrimination made by a Caucasian dining-room supervisor was dismissed
Prima facie case of discrimination
Plaintiff is a member of a protected group 2) Plaintiff was qualified for the job and performing at a level that met the employer's legitimate expectations 3) Plaintiff was discharged 4) After discharge, the position was filled by someone not within plaintiff's protected class or the discharge occurred under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination
Shoney's stated a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for discharging Singh
Shoney's reasonably believed the allegation contained in the petition, and acted on it in good faith
Unsatisfactory job performance was proven by another employer in response to an Iranian Muslim worker's claim that his termination two months after the World Trade Center terrorist attacks was discriminatory
A history of failing to "adhere to and properly enforce Food Safety procedures in his restaurant" resulted in the termination of an African American McDonald's manager
Proof that other, Caucasian managers with similar violations were not terminated would establish discrimination
If the hotel can prove the allegation that the plaintiff misappropriated hotel property, the plaintiff will need to present evidence showing that the hotel's explanation is a pretext
One way a plaintiff can show the employer's explanation is pretextual is by showing that other employees who committed similar violations were retained
To prove a racially hostile work environment, the plaintiff must show evidence that they were subjected to pervasive or severe harassment stemming from racial animus
Employers have an obligation to ensure the workplace is tolerant and accepting of all races, and must take steps to train employees and enforce policies prohibiting such conduct
Reverse discrimination occurs when a person of a majority race, which in the United States is Caucasian, sues based on race discrimination
National origin discrimination refers to discrimination based on the country where people were born or from which their ancestors came
If a plaintiff is unable to prove national origin prejudice on the part of the employer, the employee will likely not win a discrimination lawsuit
Refusal to hire workers of, for example, Spanish ancestry violates Title VII