RC 225: Experimental Psychology

Subdecks (2)

Cards (41)

  • Within-subjects design

    In a within-subjects experiment, subjects are assigned to more than one treatment condition
  • Within-subjects design

    Researchers measure subjects on the dependent variable after each treatment
  • Within-subjects design
    Subjects participate in more than one treatment condition and serve as their own control
  • Within-subjects design
    We compare their performance on the dependent variable across conditions to determine whether there is a treatment effect
  • Two major sources of confounding variables in within-subjects designs
    • Confounding from environmental variables
    • Confounding from time-related factors
  • Confounding from time-related factors

    • Participants are measured over time
    • Many events can affect a participant over time, so observed changes may be due to time-related effects rather than treatment differences
  • Time-related effects
    • Maturation
    • Instrumentation
    • History
    • Statistical regression
    • Order effects
  • Maturation
    A third grader may read better after three months because she is maturing rather than because of a reading intervention
  • Instrumentation
    Measuring instruments, including researchers themselves, may affect scores
  • History
    An unrelated event may influence the outcomes
  • Statistical regression
    Extreme scores tend to become less extreme over time due to statistical regression
  • Order effects
    Positive and negative performance changes due to a condition's position in a series of treatments
  • Progressive error

    Encompasses both positive and negative order effects
  • Order effects

    • Participation in one condition can directly affect participation in another treatment condition
    • Holding order constant would confound the experiment
  • Practice effects
    Outcome measure improves on each administration due to the effects of practice taking the test
  • Fatigue
    A person might perform worse on each administration due to fatigue
  • Carryover effects
    The effects of participation on the first treatment carry over into the second treatment, making the outcome better or worse than if it had been the only treatment
  • Contrast effects
    A type of carryover effect where the perception of one treatment is affected by its contrast with another
  • Dealing with time-related and order effects
    • Time-related effects like history and maturation are less of a problem in shorter experiments
    • If order effects are likely to be a major problem, a between-subjects design may be better
  • Counterbalancing
    A method of controlling order effects by distributing progressive error across different treatment conditions
  • Counterbalancing strategies

    • Subject-by-subject counterbalancing
    • Across subjects counterbalancing
  • Counterbalancing and time-related effects

    • Half the participants undergo treatment 1 then 2, the other half undergo 2 then 1
    • Still a within-subjects design, just with different orders
  • Counterbalancing and order effects

    • Counterbalancing does not eliminate order effects, but it eliminates them as a confound by spreading them equally across conditions
  • Counterbalancing and the number of treatments
    • As the number of treatment conditions increases, the number of possible counterbalancing sequences increases dramatically (n!)
  • Subject-by-subject counterbalancing

    Controls progressive error for each subject by presenting all treatment conditions more than once
  • Subject-by-subject counterbalancing techniques

    • Reverse counterbalancing
    • Block randomization
  • Reverse counterbalancing

    Only controls for linear progressive error, can confound the experiment
  • Block randomization
    Assigns each subject to several complete blocks of treatment, with each block presenting the treatments in a different random order
  • Advantages of within-subjects designs

    • Use fewer subjects
    • Save time on training
    • Greater statistical power
    • More completed record of subject's performance
  • Disadvantages of within-subjects designs
    • Subjects participate longer
    • Resetting equipment may take time
    • Treatment conditions may interfere with each other
    • Treatment order may confound results