RC 225: Experimental Psychology

    Subdecks (2)

    Cards (41)

    • Within-subjects design

      In a within-subjects experiment, subjects are assigned to more than one treatment condition
    • Within-subjects design

      Researchers measure subjects on the dependent variable after each treatment
    • Within-subjects design
      Subjects participate in more than one treatment condition and serve as their own control
    • Within-subjects design
      We compare their performance on the dependent variable across conditions to determine whether there is a treatment effect
    • Two major sources of confounding variables in within-subjects designs
      • Confounding from environmental variables
      • Confounding from time-related factors
    • Confounding from time-related factors

      • Participants are measured over time
      • Many events can affect a participant over time, so observed changes may be due to time-related effects rather than treatment differences
    • Time-related effects
      • Maturation
      • Instrumentation
      • History
      • Statistical regression
      • Order effects
    • Maturation
      A third grader may read better after three months because she is maturing rather than because of a reading intervention
    • Instrumentation
      Measuring instruments, including researchers themselves, may affect scores
    • History
      An unrelated event may influence the outcomes
    • Statistical regression
      Extreme scores tend to become less extreme over time due to statistical regression
    • Order effects
      Positive and negative performance changes due to a condition's position in a series of treatments
    • Progressive error

      Encompasses both positive and negative order effects
    • Order effects

      • Participation in one condition can directly affect participation in another treatment condition
      • Holding order constant would confound the experiment
    • Practice effects
      Outcome measure improves on each administration due to the effects of practice taking the test
    • Fatigue
      A person might perform worse on each administration due to fatigue
    • Carryover effects
      The effects of participation on the first treatment carry over into the second treatment, making the outcome better or worse than if it had been the only treatment
    • Contrast effects
      A type of carryover effect where the perception of one treatment is affected by its contrast with another
    • Dealing with time-related and order effects
      • Time-related effects like history and maturation are less of a problem in shorter experiments
      • If order effects are likely to be a major problem, a between-subjects design may be better
    • Counterbalancing
      A method of controlling order effects by distributing progressive error across different treatment conditions
    • Counterbalancing strategies

      • Subject-by-subject counterbalancing
      • Across subjects counterbalancing
    • Counterbalancing and time-related effects

      • Half the participants undergo treatment 1 then 2, the other half undergo 2 then 1
      • Still a within-subjects design, just with different orders
    • Counterbalancing and order effects

      • Counterbalancing does not eliminate order effects, but it eliminates them as a confound by spreading them equally across conditions
    • Counterbalancing and the number of treatments
      • As the number of treatment conditions increases, the number of possible counterbalancing sequences increases dramatically (n!)
    • Subject-by-subject counterbalancing

      Controls progressive error for each subject by presenting all treatment conditions more than once
    • Subject-by-subject counterbalancing techniques

      • Reverse counterbalancing
      • Block randomization
    • Reverse counterbalancing

      Only controls for linear progressive error, can confound the experiment
    • Block randomization
      Assigns each subject to several complete blocks of treatment, with each block presenting the treatments in a different random order
    • Advantages of within-subjects designs

      • Use fewer subjects
      • Save time on training
      • Greater statistical power
      • More completed record of subject's performance
    • Disadvantages of within-subjects designs
      • Subjects participate longer
      • Resetting equipment may take time
      • Treatment conditions may interfere with each other
      • Treatment order may confound results