Lesbian and gay scholarship began in Britain in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries
Homosexuality
Viewed as sinful, immoral and criminal in the nineteenth century, but presented as an inborn, normal variation by Havelock Ellis and others
The development of an affirmative lesbian and gay psychology in the US outpaced that in the UK in the second half of the twentieth century
June Hopkins
British-based clinical psychologist who published a groundbreaking paper on the lesbian personality in the 1960s, offering an affirmative psychological perspective on lesbians
Terms used by Hopkins to describe the lesbian personality
More independent
More resilient
More reserved
More dominant
More bohemian
More self-sufficient
More composed
Hopkins was one of very few British psychologists studying lesbians and gay men from an affirmative perspective in the 1960s and 1970s
Rorschach protocol
Used as a diagnostic tool to "detect" homosexuality
After Hopkins' papers were published, there was a significant lull in lesbian and gay psychological output until the 1980s
John Hart and Diane Richardson
Critical of the male bias in the literature on homosexuality, and careful to distinguish the differences in the experience of homosexual women and men
Emphasised the importance of placing homosexuality in a social context, and of acknowledging the political implications of theories of homosexuality
Richardson's call for reflexivity in research on homosexuality
Professionals should cease to see themselves as neutral technicians and instead recognize their role as moral agents
Hart's view on therapy and counselling for lesbian and gay clients
It is difficult to see how the conditions for successful therapy can be achieved by therapists who personally hold pathological models of homosexuality or who are anxious about their own sexuality
Richardson and Hart's alternative theory of the development and maintenance of a homosexual identity
Emphasised personal choice, the possibility of change throughout the life span, and the meanings of homosexuality for the individual
Placed homosexuality firmly within a political arena, in contrast to the work they reviewed which theorised homosexuality as if it were apart from moral debates
Golombok, Spencer and Rutter's study on the psychosocial experiences of the children of lesbian mothers was a landmark publication in research on lesbian and gay parenting
Golombok and Tasker's longitudinal study of children in lesbian families was the first of its kind to be published
In 1986, a paper in the Bulletin of the British Psychological Society called attention to lesbian and gay psychology as a neglected area of British research
Compared to the US, there was a lack of British research on heterosexuals' attitudes toward homosexuals in the mid-1980s
Celia Kitzinger's research on lesbian identities
Rejected the hierarchal, liberal-humanistic models of lesbian and gay identity formation developed by psychologists in the US
Offered a social constructionist account of lesbian identities
methodological study
A study of lesbian identities (Kitzinger and Stainton-Rogers, 1985)
Kitzinger's research focused specifically on lesbians and highlighted differences between lesbians and heterosexual women, and between lesbians and gay men (Rothblum, 2004)
Social constructionist approach to identity
Concerned with how people construct, negotiate and interpret their experience - the focus is on people's accounts per se, rather than on inspecting them for what they reveal about underlying emotions, thoughts and feelings, or on assessing their truth-value
Kitzinger's five distinct accounts of lesbian identity
Personal fulfillment
True love
Personal sexual orientation
Political/feminist
Personal inadequacy
Kitzinger explicitly acknowledged that the political/feminist lesbian account is "the account on which I have relied most heavily in constructing my own account of lesbianism and as such constitutes the context from within which I assess and discuss the other four accounts" (Kitzinger, 1986, p. 164)
Kitzinger's critique of affirmative lesbian and gay psychology
She was critical of the liberal-humanistic and positivist-empiricist frameworks underlying much affirmative lesbian and gay psychology, and concepts such as "homophobia" and "internalised homophobia"
Kitzinger called for a radical, feminist, critical, social constructionist lesbian and gay psychology that deconstructed the ideologies underlying research in this area, and the "mystique surrounding social science itself" (p. 188)
Kitzinger's critique of the concept of homophobia
It "depoliticises lesbian and gay oppression by suggesting that it comes from the personal inadequacy of particular individuals suffering from a diagnosable phobia"
Kitzinger's critique of the concept of internalised homophobia
If some people are unhappy about being lesbian or gay, this is a perfectly reasonable response to oppression. "Internalised" homophobia shifts the focus of concern away from the oppressor and back onto the victims of oppression
In 1990, the official publication of the British Psychological Society, The Psychologist, published a paper by Celia Kitzinger (1990a) that drew attention to the rampant heterosexism in British psychology and how it affects lesbian and gay staff and students in psychology departments
The European Association of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Psychologists was established in 1992
Homosexuality was removed from the International Classification of Diseases in 1993, two decades after the removal of homosexuality per se from the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)
In 1994, Charles Neal founded the Association for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Psychologies (ALGBP-UK), which affiliated to ALGP-Europe
The Lesbian and Gay Psychology Section was finally established within the BPS in 1998, after nearly a decade of campaigning and three rejected proposals
The Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review is the only LGBT psychology journal published in the UK
In the UK, counselling and therapy are not part of the remit of social workers, and there is an important distinction between the National Health Service (NHS) and the private (and voluntary) sector
There is little in the way of professional infrastructure specifically for counsellors and psychotherapists working with lesbian and gay clients in the UK
Some LGBT psychology in the UK is essentialist, positivist-empiricist, quantitative and liberal, while a significant proportion is constructionist, discursive, qualitative, and critical
Debates about essentialism versus social constructionism are a feature of LGBT psychology in the UK
LGBT psychological research in the UK looks epistemologically and methodologically much like social psychology and could loosely be described as social psychological in nature
LGBT psychology in the UK is also closely associated with qualitative methods
Much LGBT psychology in the UK fits firmly in the canon of critical psychology