criminals are physically different from non criminals because of their body type. Somatotypes are linked to criminal behaviour
somatotype
Ectomorph
endomorph
mesomorph
ectomorph
thin,fragile lacking muscle and fat
endomorph
rounded,soft and fat
mesomorph
muscular,hard bodied and strong
what somatotype is most likely to be criminal
mesomorph
sheldons somatotype research
researched photographs of 4000 criminals compared to photographs of college students with no criminal history . He rated them on a scale of 1-7 in regards to mesomorphy criminals scored higher on the scale
somatotype link to crime
mesomorphs are more likely to commit violent crimes than any other somatotype due to their need to seek adventure and thrill which ineviatably makes them prone to criminality
lombroso
founding father of criminology -born criminal theory
born criminal theorist
lombroso
born criminal theory description
criminals are physically different from non criminals. us and them theory. criminals can be identified distinct physical features . criminals are atavistic (throwback to earlier stages of life ) criminals are savages-impulsive,reduced sensitivity to pain and unable to control their behaviour.
atavistic features
enormous jaws , prominent eyebrow arch , handle bar shaped ears , high cheek bones, large eye sockets, long arms
lombroso research
researched 388 dead criminals and compared them with 3838 living criminals in 1876 . looked at their distinct physical feature. 40% of his research had atavistic features
born criminal link back to crime
these criminals are more desensitised to pain and more impulsive than the rest of society which explains why they commit more crime
christeansen theory
twin studies
twin studies theorist
christeansen
twin studies description
genetic theorists have used twin studies to test whether there is a genetic link to criminality. They use monozygotic twins to test this theory (identical) . If one twin was criminal the other twin should be too according to genetic theories
christeansen research
chris conducted reseach on 3586 twins in denmark . concordance rate for mz twins was 52% - if one identical twin had a conviction there was a 52% chance of the other twin also having a conviction. concordance rate for DZ twins was 22%
twin studies link back to crime
this supports genetic explanations as to why people commit crime
jacobs theory
xyy theory
xyy theory
jacobs
xyy study description
jacobs said that abnormal sez chromosomes is a cause of criminality
chromosomes are made up of DNA and proteins and hold many of our genes (we typically have 46)
men have xy chromosomes women have xx chromosomes
some males have an extra y chromosome causing an abnormality.known as supermale syndrome
supermale syndrome characteristics
hightened aggression , more violent , low intelligence , strong and well built
jacobs research
based on studies of imprisoned criminals
higher than average proportion of inmates. were found to have xyy
many had a history of aggression and violent assault
xyy link back to crime
price and whatmore found that xyy males were immature and unstable and were more likely to commit motiveless property crime
adoption studies theorist
mednick et al
mednick et al
adoption studies
adoption studies description
testing the nature vs nurture debate. compare adopted children to their biological parents and their adopted parents .
aim to find out whether children are more likely to be criminal due to their genetics or their environment
mednick et al research
examined data on 14000 sons in denmark . sons were more likely to have a criminal record if their birth parent also had a criminal record
concordance rate of 20% -supports a genetic explanation
concordance rate of 14.7 for children being criminals if their adopted parent had a criminal conviction
they compared adoptees with and without criminal records
adoption studies link back to crime
adoptees with criminal records were more likely to have bio parents with criminal records that adoptees whose birth parents did not have criminal records
differential association theory
sutherland
sutherland
differential association
differential association description
sutherland argued that people learn their values and techniques for criminal behaviour from those around them their associations -family and peer groups
through imitation and learned attitudes
imitation
acquiring criminal skills by observing those around them
learned attitudes
socialisation influences a persons norms and values . if a person has more criminal associates than law abiding citizens they are more likely to have a favourable attitude to criminal behaviour as it becomes normal and they commit crime themselves