Save
...
Animal cognition
Lecture 4
Language
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Alice
Visit profile
Cards (18)
Communication in honeybees
Honeybees communicate by
rotating
bodies
Experiments show
accuracy
of movements - despite some errors
flexible
&
communication
form can be
altered
- not case in most non-human animals
Alarm calls in vervet monkeys
only have a
small
repertoire of alarm calls
Calls
specific
to certain types of
danger
evoking specific
responses
Alarm calls can be specific
Experiments using
loudspeakers
to play sounds in absence of predator
show
responses
of receiver monkeys are responses to
sounds
- not
predators
themselves
Alarm calls can be referential
property
of language =
exhibit
qualities
similar to those found in
human
language
refer to
specific
objects, situations, convey
meaningful
information to others
Referential alarms calls in Diana monkeys
played sounds from speaker frequently to get
habituation
response
After - played sound of leopard -
monkeys
still not
responding
due to habituation
replaced with
eagles
sounds - responded by
hiding
= alarm calls
referential
&
specific
however, alarm calls
don’t imply theory of mind or intentional communication
Calls more likely in presence of conspecifics - other vervet monkeys
but might be tendency to make
sounds
when others around
Alarm calls to baboons found only in young vervets – even when young vervets present
Alarm calls might reflect the animal’s own state
Issues with alarm calls
inflexible
almost no examples of
novel
calls
can be explained by innate
repertoire
- with some learning - apply calls to
correct
situation
not language - just form of
communication
that suits species
Brief history of comparative language research
1930s - Kellogg adopts Gua (chimpanzee) - raises him alongside son
With lot of coaching - could say Papa
1940s - Cathy & Keith Hayes adopt Viki (chimpanzee)
After
4
years, Viki could say Mama, Papa, cup, up
Chimpanzees lack vocal
apparatus
for human speech
later attempts used either
sign
language & symbols
Different primates and the sign language words they learnt
most learn around just over
100
in 4/
5
years
1 =
250
in
4
years
2 year olds learn about
10
words per day
chester dog -
1,000
= doesn't mean
understand
language
Properties of language - productivity
words can be
combined
to produce
meaningful
phrases
doubtful that non-human animals can use
language
this way
Can non-humans generate or understand phrases
Washoe - saw picture of
swan
- hadn't
learnt
before & signed "
water
bird"
Lana - saw picture of orange - said "
apple
which is orange colour" in Yerkish
Do these really demonstrate acting of a
novel phrase
?
Apes rarely produce meaningful multi-word utterances
utterances essentially
gibberish
& aren't
meaningful
sentences, not supporting evidence for
spontaneous
utterances
higher
age
= bigger
mean
length of utterances
Multi-word signed utterances by chimpanzees
no evidence of
syntax
or
meaning
conveyed by
ordering
many utterances used
same
words
86
% of utterences - requests - consistent with idea of
instrumental
behaviour - action performed to achieve a
goal
Kazi's language comprehension
mean
length of utterances -
1.5
played
310
sentences - containing instructions
responded to
298
can
understand
sentences, sentence
structure
?
how correct was kazi
21
instances required use of sentence
structure
Other researchers dissected 21 instances of sentences structure & rated how correctly Kanzi responded:
Savage-Rumbaugh reported
12
correct -
chance
Wynne -
7
best evidence for sentence comprehension - dolphin
trained with
sign
language
tested with
novel
phrases
results suggest understanding of
syntax
no evidence of
production
Conclusion
plenty of
evidence
animals make
appropriate
responses to stimuli
little evidence of language
production
or
comprehension
Possible reasons animals struggle to produce/ comprehend language
animals lack necessary
mechanisms
- language
production
module,
abstract
thought
not sufficiently
motivated
lack
exposure
to language humans have
yet to
test
abilities adequately