qualitative data is non-numerical data expressed in words like extract from a diary
Strength and limitation of qualitative data:
richness of detail- much broader in scope and quantitive data. More meaningful, great to validity
Difficult to analyse– hard to identify patterns and make comparisons. Leads to subject of interpretation and research a bias
Quantitive data is numerical data like reaction time or number of mistakes
Strengthen limitation of quantitive data:
Easier to analyse– control graph and touch the averages. So comparisons between groups can be made
Narrower in meaning– express less detail than qualitative data. Low external validity
Primary data is firsthand data collected for the purpose of the investigation
Strengthen limitation of firsthand data:
Fits the job – study designed to extract only the data needed. Information is directly relevant to research aims
Requires time and effort – designing and collecting questionnaires takes time and expense. Secondary data can be assessed within minutes
Secondary data is collected by someone other than the person who is conducting the research
Strengthen imitation of secondary data:
It is inexpensive – the desired information may already exist. Requires minimal effort making it inexpensive
Quality may be poor – information may be outdated or incomplete. Challenges the validity of any conclusions
Meta analysis is a type of secondary data that involves combining data from a large number of studies.
Strength and limitation of meta analysis:
Increases validity of conclusions – the eventual sample size is much larger than individual samples. Increase is the extent to which generalisations can be made
Publication bias – research is may not select all relevant studies, leaving out negative or non-significant results. Therefore conclusions mean like validity