Reciprocalgeneticchange in interacting species, owing to natural selection imposed by each on the other
Coevolution
Selection that species exert on each other differ among populations
Coevolution
The nature and strength of an interaction between twospecies may vary depending on the genotype, environmentalconditions, and other species which those species interact
Specific coevolution
Twospeciesevolve in response to each other
Diffuse coevolution
Severalspecies are involved and their effects are notindependent
• Escape-and-radiatecoevolution
Species evolves a defense against enemies, hence are enabled to radiate into diversedescendantspecies to which different enemies may later adapt.
RedQueen Hypothesis
LeighVanValen (1973)
Conceptual basis: species (or populations) must continuallyevolvenewadaptations in response to evolutionarychanges in other organisms to avoid extinction.
(R.A. Fisher)
“probably more important than the changes in climate will be the evolutionary changes in progress in associatedorganisms"
• Escalation (evolutionaryarms race)
Occur if the capture rate of the prey by the predatorincreases with the difference between the defensive trait of a prey
Characteristics of both species will evolve in onedirection
Oscillation
Occur if the capturerate of the prey by the predator depends on a closematchbetween the predator and preytraits
Results in continuingcycles of change in the characteristics of both species, contributing to cycles in populationdensity.
Aposematism (Aposematic mechanism)
Biological means by which an organism advertises its dangerousnature to a potentialpredator
Subject to positivefrequency-dependentselection, and thus tend to be disadvantageous
Might be caused by geneticdrift or when selection by predators are relaxed.
Mimicry
Form of convergent evolution
Resemblance between different species has evolved because it is advantageous for members of one species to resemble another
Defensivemimicry
most common kind; often based on aposematiccoloration of other species
Batesianmimicry
palatable species mimics an unpalatable species
Batesian mimicry
Selection on a mimeticphenotype depend on its density and degree of unpalatability of the model species
Müllerian mimicry
two or more unpalatable species are co-mimics (or co-models) that jointlyreinforceaversion learning by predators
Müllerian mimicry
Causes positive frequency-dependent selection, since common phenotypes will be better recognized and avoided
Secondary compounds
plant products that play little or no role in primarymetabolism
Many are toxic and repellent to animals
insects and other herbivores impose selection for chemical and other defenses
Eventually, herbivores from other hosts shift to these plants, adapt to the defense, and give rise to adaptedclade of herbivores.
Overcoming the host's defenses
Movement from one host to another
2 greatest challenges for a parasite:
Vertical transmission
Horizontal transmission
movement of one host to another by:
Vertical transmission
from hostparent to its offspring
Horizontal transmission
via the environment
Virulent Parasites
parasites that reducesurvival and reproduction of hosts
In a host with multiple, unrelated genotypes of parasites, selection will favor the one with highest reproductive rate (may be highly virulent)
Virulent genotypes in horizontally transmitted parasites > vertically transmitted
If host can only support parasitereproduction for a short time, selection favors rapid parasite reproduction (greater virulence)
Mutualisms
• Interactions between species that benefit individuals of both species
• Important basis for adaptation and evolution of biochemicalcomplexity
• Some provide one or both partners with new capabilities
• Some have arisen from parasitic or other exploitative relationships
However, many species “cheat” — but several factors can reduce fitness of the cheater genotypes to maintain a mutualistic relationship
Punishment, to prevent overexploitation
Reward the most cooperative/beneficial individuals or excludecheaters
Selection to favor “honest” genotypes
Intraspecific competition
Competition for resources between members of the same species
Leads to evolution of better adaptation within species
Basic factor in naturalselection
Interspecific competition
Competition for resources between members of different species
Extinction
Specialization
Two major effects of interspecific competition
Specialization
occur when competing species evolve to different adaptations
Extinction
occur when >2 competing species for the same resources cannot coexist indefinitely
Ecological Character Displacement
Divergence in response to competition between species
EcologicalRelease
Species (or population) exhibits greatervariation in resource use, and in associated phenotypiccharacters, if it occurs alone
Basis: competition for resources can sustain diversity of both species and of genotypes within species