WSC: 'The country was the 'jewel in the crown' of the British Empire and that it had to be protected in order to keep it maintained'
WSC knew how Britain had benefitted from its economic exploitation of the country
Nationalism had been growing with protests becoming increasingly common and sometimes violent leading to events such as the Amritsar Massacre in 1919
WSC took for granted that Britain'S greatness was bound with its imperial status
British rule was coming under pressure during the 1920s & 1930s from an Indian population who wanted self-governance and representation
WSC knew how Britain had benefitted from its economic exploitation of the country
WSC took for granted that Britain's greatness was bound with its imperial status
WSC's view of "the natives"
Extremely paternalistic and condescending, believed Britain had been a force for good and prevented the domination of the Hindu elites over the large number of Indian Muslims
WSC saw an end of what he saw as barbaric practices such as sati (widows throwing themselves on top of their husbands' pyres), allowing economic and socialprogress
WSC believed India having more freedoms
Would lead to conflict between the Hindu and Muslim populations
The pressure came from the discontented poor and the wealthy, well-educated, middle-class Indians who were being led by Mahatma Gandhi
In the late 1920s, the British Labour government under Ramsey MacDonald, was committed to negotiating with Indian nationalists especially after Gandhi's protest on the salt tax in 1930
Viceroy LordIrwin officially publicly endorsed India being granted Dominion status the first ever non-white colony
Gandhi was released from prison in India to attend the Roundtable Conferences in London (1930 & 1931)
Gandhi was warmly welcomed by the working class and there were often crowds of people who were eager to see him in places such as Tottenham
In 1931, a coalition known as the 'National Government' was formed leading to the India Bill in 1935 which took effect in 1937 providing India with more federal freedoms
WSC was excluded from the National Government due to his vehement opposition and his views on India
His damming remarks calling Gandhi a 'fakir caused immediate uproar and outrage particularly in India which exasperated the government as it was made during the Conferences
Indian nationalists condemned WSC
It served to further alienate the educated middle-class
WSC's bitter attacks against government ministers on India reform threatened to shatter the party causing a loss of trust in the party's leadership
1934
WSC was denounced by PM StanleyBaldwin (1935-7)
His aggressivespeechmaking compared unfavourably with Baldwin'scalm and measuredstyle
Many Toriesresented WSC
His struggle against the India Act divided the party and threatened their grip on power
WSC was associated with and supported racist organisations
It isolated him from moderateTories
WSC's actions
Reduced any realistic chance of him regaining highoffice again
During WWII
WSC conceded far more than many expected during negotiations to ensure Indian support